TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Bill Clinton visited Epstein's island 28 times

Fact Check: Bill Clinton visited Epstein's island 28 times

Published July 28, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact-Check: "Bill Clinton visited Epstein's island 28 times" ## What We Know The claim that "Bill Clinton visited Epstein's island 28 times" origi...

Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Fact-Check: "Bill Clinton visited Epstein's island 28 times"

What We Know

The claim that "Bill Clinton visited Epstein's island 28 times" originates from comments made by former President Donald Trump during a press conference. Trump stated, "I never went to the island, but Larry Summers, I hear, went there. He was the head of Harvard and many other people that are very big people... But Bill Clinton went there, supposedly, 28 times" (Global News).

Clinton has publicly denied any wrongdoing or knowledge of Epstein's criminal activities. A spokesperson for Clinton reiterated that he had not spoken to Epstein in over a decade and had never visited Little St. James Island, Epstein's private retreat (Newsweek). Flight logs from Epstein's private jet show that Clinton flew on the plane multiple times, but they do not confirm any trips to the island itself (Newsweek).

Additionally, a former associate of Clinton, Doug Band, claimed in a 2020 interview that Clinton did visit Epstein's island in January 2003, although this assertion lacks corroborating evidence (Newsweek).

Analysis

The assertion that Clinton visited Epstein's island 28 times lacks direct evidence. Trump's statement is based on his own claims, which have not been substantiated by independent sources. The reliability of Trump's comments is questionable, as they are often made in a politically charged context, aiming to divert attention from his own connections to Epstein (Global News).

While Clinton's spokesperson has denied the allegations and emphasized that Clinton has not been in contact with Epstein for many years, the existence of flight logs showing Clinton's travel on Epstein's jet complicates the narrative. However, these logs do not provide evidence of visits to the island itself (Newsweek).

Doug Band's claims, while potentially credible given his past association with Clinton, are anecdotal and lack supporting documentation. This makes them less reliable as evidence of Clinton's presence on the island.

In summary, while Trump's claim that Clinton visited the island 28 times is notable, it is primarily based on his assertions without corroborating evidence. The sources surrounding this claim exhibit varying degrees of reliability, with Trump's comments being the least reliable due to their political context.

Conclusion

The claim that "Bill Clinton visited Epstein's island 28 times" is Partially True. While Trump made this assertion, there is no direct evidence to substantiate it. Clinton has denied visiting the island, and existing flight logs do not confirm such visits. Thus, while the claim has some basis in Trump's statements, it lacks the necessary evidence to be fully verified.

Sources

  1. Trump says he turned down offer to go to Epstein island
  2. Trump explains fallout with Epstein, denies ever visiting his ...
  3. Did Bill Clinton Visit Jeffrey Epstein's Island? What We Know
  4. Epstein's birthday book also included an entry from Bill ...
  5. Trump Says Bill Clinton Visited Epstein's Island '28 Times'
  6. Trump Reveals Bill Clinton Visited Epstein Island 28 Times ...
  7. Trump says he 'never had the privilege of going' to Epstein ...
  8. Bill Clinton reportedly sent Jeffrey Epstein note for birthday ...
Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Late pedophile hung portrait of cross- dressing Bill in his $88m Manhattan lair, made 17 visits to the White House, and flew president 26 times on his private jet
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Late pedophile hung portrait of cross- dressing Bill in his $88m Manhattan lair, made 17 visits to the White House, and flew president 26 times on his private jet

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Late pedophile hung portrait of cross- dressing Bill in his $88m Manhattan lair, made 17 visits to the White House, and flew president 26 times on his private jet

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 125 Americans are shot and killed every day, and 200 MORE are injured — and Republicans just eliminated the tax on gun silencers as part of their “Big (Not-So) Beautiful Bill (Now Law).” Republicans added a provision in the final hours eliminates a nearly-century-old tax — which is currently $200 — for purchasing or making silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and other weapons.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: 125 Americans are shot and killed every day, and 200 MORE are injured — and Republicans just eliminated the tax on gun silencers as part of their “Big (Not-So) Beautiful Bill (Now Law).” Republicans added a provision in the final hours eliminates a nearly-century-old tax — which is currently $200 — for purchasing or making silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and other weapons.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 125 Americans are shot and killed every day, and 200 MORE are injured — and Republicans just eliminated the tax on gun silencers as part of their “Big (Not-So) Beautiful Bill (Now Law).” Republicans added a provision in the final hours eliminates a nearly-century-old tax — which is currently $200 — for purchasing or making silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and other weapons.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Yes — The post makes clear factual claims: Federal funding is on hold, affecting Tennessee education projects (e.g. after-school programs and a $118M K‑12 grant). Rep. Tim Burchett supported legislation (part of the "Big Beautiful Bill") that cut the $42M East Knoxville grant.
Partially True

Fact Check: Yes — The post makes clear factual claims: Federal funding is on hold, affecting Tennessee education projects (e.g. after-school programs and a $118M K‑12 grant). Rep. Tim Burchett supported legislation (part of the "Big Beautiful Bill") that cut the $42M East Knoxville grant.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Yes — The post makes clear factual claims: Federal funding is on hold, affecting Tennessee education projects (e.g. after-school programs and a $118M K‑12 grant). Rep. Tim Burchett supported legislation (part of the "Big Beautiful Bill") that cut the $42M East Knoxville grant.

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 173 Nations Just Granted Expanded Powers to the WHO While public attention was elsewhere, representatives from 173 countries voted to significantly expand the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO) over national health policies, border decisions, and personal freedoms. Under these new agreements, when the WHO declares a "global health emergency," it will no longer need to seek approval from individual governments to enforce its directives. Your nation has already committed to following their lead. This could include: Border shutdowns Lockdowns Mass vaccination efforts Digital health ID systems All potentially initiated by unelected figures such as WHO Directo General Tedros Ghebreyesus or influential private actors like Bill Gates-without any democratic input from the citizens who will b
Partially True

Fact Check: 173 Nations Just Granted Expanded Powers to the WHO While public attention was elsewhere, representatives from 173 countries voted to significantly expand the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO) over national health policies, border decisions, and personal freedoms. Under these new agreements, when the WHO declares a "global health emergency," it will no longer need to seek approval from individual governments to enforce its directives. Your nation has already committed to following their lead. This could include: Border shutdowns Lockdowns Mass vaccination efforts Digital health ID systems All potentially initiated by unelected figures such as WHO Directo General Tedros Ghebreyesus or influential private actors like Bill Gates-without any democratic input from the citizens who will b

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 173 Nations Just Granted Expanded Powers to the WHO While public attention was elsewhere, representatives from 173 countries voted to significantly expand the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO) over national health policies, border decisions, and personal freedoms. Under these new agreements, when the WHO declares a "global health emergency," it will no longer need to seek approval from individual governments to enforce its directives. Your nation has already committed to following their lead. This could include: Border shutdowns Lockdowns Mass vaccination efforts Digital health ID systems All potentially initiated by unelected figures such as WHO Directo General Tedros Ghebreyesus or influential private actors like Bill Gates-without any democratic input from the citizens who will b

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: TRUMP'S big beautiful bill is the largest transfer of wealth from the bottom to the top
Partially True

Fact Check: TRUMP'S big beautiful bill is the largest transfer of wealth from the bottom to the top

Detailed fact-check analysis of: TRUMP'S big beautiful bill is the largest transfer of wealth from the bottom to the top

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Bill Clinton visited Epstein's island 28 times | TruthOrFake Blog