Fact Check: Barrett's Ruling Revives Trump's Plan to End Birthright Citizenship
What We Know
On June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling that limited the ability of federal judges to issue universal injunctions against executive actions, including those related to immigration and citizenship policies. This ruling was significant because it did not directly address the legality of President Trump's executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship, which asserts that the Fourteenth Amendment does not guarantee citizenship to everyone born in the U.S. (source-2, source-3).
The Supreme Court's decision effectively allows the Trump administration to proceed with its efforts to reshape U.S. immigration policy, as it limits the judicial checks that previously blocked such actions. Trump's executive order, issued on his first day in office, has faced multiple legal challenges, but the Supreme Court's ruling may facilitate its enforcement moving forward (source-4).
Analysis
The claim that Barrett's ruling revives Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship is partially true. While the ruling does not explicitly endorse Trump's executive order, it does remove a significant legal barrier that previously prevented its enforcement. The Supreme Court's decision to limit universal injunctions means that lower courts may have less power to block executive actions like Trump's, which could indirectly support his agenda regarding birthright citizenship (source-1).
However, it is important to note that the Court did not rule on the substantive legality of the executive order itself. This means that while the ruling may facilitate Trump's plans, it does not guarantee their implementation or success. The immigrant rights groups are already mobilizing to challenge any attempts to enforce the executive order through a national class action lawsuit, indicating that the legal battle over birthright citizenship is far from over (source-3).
The reliability of the sources used in this analysis is high, as they include direct references to Supreme Court rulings and reputable news outlets that provide context and expert opinions on the implications of the ruling (source-2, source-4).
Conclusion
The verdict on the claim that "Barrett's ruling revives Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship" is Partially True. The Supreme Court's ruling does not directly support the executive order but removes significant judicial obstacles that could allow the Trump administration to pursue its policy goals regarding birthright citizenship. However, the legal landscape remains contentious, with ongoing challenges from immigrant rights advocates.
