Fact Check: Automakers use screens to create new revenue streams through subscriptions.

Fact Check: Automakers use screens to create new revenue streams through subscriptions.

Published June 28, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: Automakers Use Screens to Create New Revenue Streams Through Subscriptions ## What We Know The claim that automakers are leveraging scr...

Fact Check: Automakers Use Screens to Create New Revenue Streams Through Subscriptions

What We Know

The claim that automakers are leveraging screens to generate new revenue streams through subscriptions is grounded in recent trends within the automotive industry. Many automakers have begun to integrate advanced infotainment systems that offer subscription-based features, such as enhanced navigation, streaming services, and even performance upgrades. For instance, Tesla has been at the forefront of this trend, offering features like Full Self-Driving (FSD) capabilities as a subscription service, which allows users to pay monthly for access rather than a one-time fee (source).

Additionally, traditional automakers like BMW and Mercedes-Benz have also explored subscription models. BMW introduced a subscription service for heated seats, allowing customers to pay for the feature on a monthly basis rather than including it as a standard option (source). This shift towards subscription services reflects a broader trend in various industries, where companies seek to create recurring revenue streams from existing products.

Analysis

While the trend of automakers using screens for subscription services is evident, the extent and impact of this practice vary across the industry. The reliability of sources discussing this trend is generally high, as they come from reputable automotive news outlets and industry analyses. For example, reports from Automotive News and Car and Driver provide detailed insights into how automakers are implementing these strategies.

However, there are criticisms regarding the practicality and consumer acceptance of such subscription models. Many consumers express dissatisfaction with the idea of paying extra for features that they believe should be included in the purchase price of the vehicle (source). This sentiment suggests that while automakers may see potential revenue in subscriptions, the long-term viability of this model could be challenged by consumer pushback.

Moreover, the effectiveness of subscription models can vary significantly by market and demographic. Younger consumers may be more open to subscription services, while older demographics may prefer traditional ownership models. This variability complicates the narrative around the success of subscription services in the automotive sector.

Conclusion

Needs Research. While there is a clear trend of automakers utilizing screens to create new revenue streams through subscriptions, the overall impact and consumer acceptance of these models require further investigation. The evidence suggests that while some automakers are successfully implementing subscription services, the long-term sustainability of this approach is uncertain, and consumer sentiment may pose challenges to its widespread adoption.

Sources

  1. Tesla's Subscription Model
  2. BMW Heated Seat Subscription
  3. Automotive News Report on Subscription Services
  4. Car and Driver Analysis of Subscription Models
  5. Consumer Reactions to Subscription Features

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks