Fact Check: Austrian law allows revocation of refugee status within five years of granting.

Fact Check: Austrian law allows revocation of refugee status within five years of granting.

Published July 3, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Austrian Law Allows Revocation of Refugee Status Within Five Years of Granting ## What We Know Austrian law does indeed permit the revo...

Fact Check: Austrian Law Allows Revocation of Refugee Status Within Five Years of Granting

What We Know

Austrian law does indeed permit the revocation of refugee status within five years of it being granted under certain conditions. According to the Asylum Information Database, the provisions for cessation and withdrawal of international protection are outlined in the Austrian Asylum Act. Specifically, Article 7 states that refugee status can be ceased if the conditions outlined in Article 1C of the Refugee Convention are met, or if the individual has been granted refugee status in another country.

Additionally, the law stipulates that if a person has held refugee status for five years, it may only be terminated after they have received a residence permit under a different immigration status (source-3). This indicates that while revocation is possible, it is contingent upon specific legal frameworks and conditions being met.

Analysis

The claim that Austrian law allows for the revocation of refugee status within five years is substantiated by the legal framework established in the Asylum Act. The Asylum Information Database provides a detailed account of the legal provisions, confirming that cessation procedures can be initiated based on changes in the individual's circumstances or the situation in their country of origin (source-3).

Moreover, a Reuters article supports this claim by stating that Austrian authorities have the legal authority to revoke a refugee's status within five years of it being granted. This aligns with the legal stipulations mentioned in the Asylum Act, reinforcing the reliability of the information.

However, it is essential to note that the process of revocation is not arbitrary; it involves legal assessments and procedures. The authorities must evaluate whether the conditions that justified the granting of refugee status still exist (source-3). The involvement of legal aid organizations, such as the BBU (Bundesagentur für Betreuungs- und Unterstützungsleistungen), further ensures that individuals facing cessation procedures have access to legal support (source-3).

In evaluating the sources, the Asylum Information Database is a credible resource, as it is dedicated to providing comprehensive information about asylum policies across Europe. The Reuters article, being a reputable news outlet, also adds to the credibility of the claim.

Conclusion

The verdict is True. Austrian law does allow for the revocation of refugee status within five years of granting, provided certain legal conditions are met. The legal framework outlined in the Asylum Act supports this claim, and credible sources confirm the existence of such provisions.

Sources

  1. Austria deports first Syrian since civil war, says more will follow
  2. Cessation and review of protection status - Asylum Information Database
  3. Federal Act Concerning the Granting of Asylum (2005 Asylum Act)
  4. Austria's Protection Revoked: Navigating A Refugee's Legal Battle

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Does florida have a free kill law
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Does florida have a free kill law

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Does florida have a free kill law

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: michigan law calls for ice officers to be jailed for wearing mask
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: michigan law calls for ice officers to be jailed for wearing mask

Detailed fact-check analysis of: michigan law calls for ice officers to be jailed for wearing mask

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: ormer Interim NYPD Police Commissioner Tom Donlon in his lawsuit alleges that Tarik Sheppard "fraudulently orchestrated his own promotion granting himself greater authority and a higher salary"
True

Fact Check: ormer Interim NYPD Police Commissioner Tom Donlon in his lawsuit alleges that Tarik Sheppard "fraudulently orchestrated his own promotion granting himself greater authority and a higher salary"

Detailed fact-check analysis of: ormer Interim NYPD Police Commissioner Tom Donlon in his lawsuit alleges that Tarik Sheppard "fraudulently orchestrated his own promotion granting himself greater authority and a higher salary"

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Austrian suspect planned to drive explosives into Taylor Swift concert crowd.
True

Fact Check: Austrian suspect planned to drive explosives into Taylor Swift concert crowd.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Austrian suspect planned to drive explosives into Taylor Swift concert crowd.

Jun 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Austrian suspect planned to drive explosives into Taylor Swift fans.
True

Fact Check: Austrian suspect planned to drive explosives into Taylor Swift fans.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Austrian suspect planned to drive explosives into Taylor Swift fans.

Jun 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Austrian law allows revocation of refugee status within five years of granting. | TruthOrFake Blog