Fact Check: Arturo Gamboa, 24, was taken into custody on a murder charge following a shooting incident at the 'No Kings' protest in Salt Lake City on June 14, 2025.

Fact Check: Arturo Gamboa, 24, was taken into custody on a murder charge following a shooting incident at the 'No Kings' protest in Salt Lake City on June 14, 2025.

Published June 16, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Arturo Gamboa, 24, was taken into custody on a murder charge following a shooting incident at the 'No Kings' protest in Salt Lake City ...

Fact Check: "Arturo Gamboa, 24, was taken into custody on a murder charge following a shooting incident at the 'No Kings' protest in Salt Lake City on June 14, 2025."

What We Know

On June 14, 2025, a shooting incident occurred during the "No Kings" protest in downtown Salt Lake City, resulting in the death of a bystander, Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, aged 39. The Salt Lake City Police Department (SLCPD) reported that Arturo Gamboa, 24, was taken into custody and charged with murder following the incident. According to the police, Gamboa was observed handling an AR-15-style rifle and exhibited behavior that raised alarms among peacekeepers at the event. When confronted, he reportedly ran toward the crowd with the weapon, prompting one of the peacekeepers to fire, which resulted in Gamboa being shot and also fatally wounding Ah Loo (SLCPD, NY Times).

Analysis

The details surrounding the incident have been corroborated by multiple reliable sources. The SLCPD provided a comprehensive account of the events, emphasizing the rapid response of law enforcement and the tragic outcome of the shooting. The police chief, Brian Redd, confirmed that Gamboa's actions demonstrated "a depraved indifference to human life," which justified the murder charge (SLCPD).

Furthermore, reports from major news outlets such as the New York Times and NBC News align with the police's narrative, detailing how Gamboa was spotted by peacekeepers handling a rifle and running toward the crowd. The incident has been described as sudden and alarming, highlighting the chaotic atmosphere during the protest, which drew around 10,000 participants (Deseret News, ABC7 Chicago).

While some sources mention that Gamboa did not fire any shots himself, the circumstances of his actions led to a fatal outcome for an innocent bystander, which is critical in the context of the murder charge (CNN, Times Now). The ongoing investigation aims to clarify the actions of all parties involved, including the peacekeepers who were armed and engaged with Gamboa.

The credibility of the sources reporting on this incident is high, as they include official statements from the SLCPD and coverage from established news organizations. The information provided is based on eyewitness accounts and police reports, which are typically reliable in such cases.

Conclusion

The claim that "Arturo Gamboa, 24, was taken into custody on a murder charge following a shooting incident at the 'No Kings' protest in Salt Lake City on June 14, 2025" is True. The evidence from multiple credible sources confirms that Gamboa was indeed arrested and charged with murder after the tragic shooting that resulted in the death of an innocent bystander.

Sources

  1. SLCPD Provides Update on Downtown Shooting Investigation
  2. 1 Killed in Shooting at 'No Kings' Protest in Salt Lake City
  3. Salt Lake protest shooting update: 'Innocent bystander' has died ...
  4. Man killed at 'No Kings' protest in Salt Lake City ...
  5. 'No Kings' protest shooting Salt Lake City: Arturo Gamboa in custody ...
  6. Who Is Arturo Gamboa? Suspect Arrested In Fatal Salt Lake City 'No ...
  7. Protester shot and killed at 'No Kings' rally in Utah, police say
  8. Who is Arturo Gamboa, man allegedly responsible for killing ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: On June 14, 2025, during a demonstration in Salt Lake City, a man named Arturo Gamboa, 24, was taken into custody on a murder charge after he allegedly brandished a rifle and shot at demonstrators, resulting in the death of bystander Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, 39.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: On June 14, 2025, during a demonstration in Salt Lake City, a man named Arturo Gamboa, 24, was taken into custody on a murder charge after he allegedly brandished a rifle and shot at demonstrators, resulting in the death of bystander Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, 39.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: On June 14, 2025, during a demonstration in Salt Lake City, a man named Arturo Gamboa, 24, was taken into custody on a murder charge after he allegedly brandished a rifle and shot at demonstrators, resulting in the death of bystander Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, 39.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: On June 14, 2025, during a demonstration in Salt Lake City, a man named Arturo Gamboa, 24, was taken into custody on a murder charge after he allegedly shot at a person brandishing a rifle, resulting in the death of bystander Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, 39.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: On June 14, 2025, during a demonstration in Salt Lake City, a man named Arturo Gamboa, 24, was taken into custody on a murder charge after he allegedly shot at a person brandishing a rifle, resulting in the death of bystander Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, 39.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: On June 14, 2025, during a demonstration in Salt Lake City, a man named Arturo Gamboa, 24, was taken into custody on a murder charge after he allegedly shot at a person brandishing a rifle, resulting in the death of bystander Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, 39.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd stated that a peacekeeper, dressed in a neon green vest, fired three shots from a handgun at Arturo Gamboa, injuring him and fatally shooting Arthur Folasa Ah Loo.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd stated that a peacekeeper, dressed in a neon green vest, fired three shots from a handgun at Arturo Gamboa, injuring him and fatally shooting Arthur Folasa Ah Loo.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd stated that a peacekeeper, dressed in a neon green vest, fired three shots from a handgun at Arturo Gamboa, injuring him and fatally shooting Arthur Folasa Ah Loo.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd stated that a man dressed in a neon green vest, believed to be part of a peacekeeping team, fired three shots from a handgun at Arturo Gamboa, injuring him and fatally shooting Arthur Folasa Ah Loo.
True

Fact Check: Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd stated that a man dressed in a neon green vest, believed to be part of a peacekeeping team, fired three shots from a handgun at Arturo Gamboa, injuring him and fatally shooting Arthur Folasa Ah Loo.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd stated that a man dressed in a neon green vest, believed to be part of a peacekeeping team, fired three shots from a handgun at Arturo Gamboa, injuring him and fatally shooting Arthur Folasa Ah Loo.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd stated that a man believed to be part of a peacekeeping team fired three shots from a handgun at Arturo Gamboa, fatally shooting bystander Arthur Folasa Ah Loo.
True

Fact Check: Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd stated that a man believed to be part of a peacekeeping team fired three shots from a handgun at Arturo Gamboa, fatally shooting bystander Arthur Folasa Ah Loo.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd stated that a man believed to be part of a peacekeeping team fired three shots from a handgun at Arturo Gamboa, fatally shooting bystander Arthur Folasa Ah Loo.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True

Fact Check: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →