TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Around a dozen companies are launching CO2 storage pilot projects.

Fact Check: Around a dozen companies are launching CO2 storage pilot projects.

Published June 18, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Around a dozen companies are launching CO2 storage pilot projects." ## What We Know The claim that "around a dozen companies are launc...

Fact Check: "Around a dozen companies are launching CO2 storage pilot projects."

What We Know

The claim that "around a dozen companies are launching CO2 storage pilot projects" is supported by various developments in the carbon capture and storage (CCS) sector. Notably, INEOS, a major player in the petrochemical industry, has initiated significant projects related to carbon capture. For instance, INEOS and Royal Wagenborg recently launched the first European-built offshore CO2 carrier, named "Carbon Destroyer 1," which is intended to facilitate carbon capture and storage across Europe. This initiative is part of Project Greensand, which aims to establish a commercial-scale CCS value chain in the EU (INEOS).

Additionally, there are reports of multiple companies engaging in pilot projects related to CO2 storage, with some estimates suggesting that there are indeed around a dozen such initiatives underway globally (Neustark). This aligns with the growing interest in CCS technologies as a means to mitigate climate change.

Analysis

While the claim appears to be broadly accurate, it is essential to evaluate the specifics of the projects and the companies involved. The term "around a dozen" is somewhat vague and could encompass a range of projects at different stages of development. The INEOS project, for example, represents a significant investment in CCS technology, but it is just one of many initiatives in the sector (INEOS).

The credibility of the sources reporting on these developments varies. The INEOS announcement is a direct communication from a reputable company involved in the CCS sector, providing a reliable account of their activities. However, broader claims regarding the number of companies involved in pilot projects may rely on industry analyses or reports that could vary in accuracy and comprehensiveness (Neustark).

Moreover, while the CCS sector is expanding, the actual implementation of these projects can be complex and subject to regulatory, financial, and technological challenges. Therefore, while many companies are indeed launching pilot projects, the effectiveness and viability of these initiatives remain to be fully assessed.

Conclusion

The claim that "around a dozen companies are launching CO2 storage pilot projects" is Partially True. There is evidence to support the existence of multiple pilot projects in the CCS sector, including significant initiatives by companies like INEOS. However, the vagueness of "around a dozen" and the varying stages of these projects mean that the claim lacks precise verification. The CCS landscape is evolving, and while many companies are engaged in pilot projects, the overall impact and success of these initiatives are still unfolding.

Sources

  1. 二氧化碳化学式怎么写 - 百度知道 Link
  2. About - INEOS Group Link
  3. 二氧化碳的电子式是什么? - 百度知道 Link
  4. INEOS and Royal Wagenborg launch the first European built offshore CO2 carrier for carbon capture and storage Link
  5. 二氧化碳化学符号中CO2角标2如何在电脑中输入_百度知道 Link
  6. Top 10 Ocean Carbon Removal Companies In 2025 Link
  7. 怎么打出二氧化碳“CO2”的英文 那个2要在下面 小点的 Link
  8. From pilot project to the first commercial CO2 storage site in Germany Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: As long as there is a recycling of old emergency ordinances based on colonial procedures around the world, no one will be free from phenomena such as cultural degradation.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: As long as there is a recycling of old emergency ordinances based on colonial procedures around the world, no one will be free from phenomena such as cultural degradation.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: As long as there is a recycling of old emergency ordinances based on colonial procedures around the world, no one will be free from phenomena such as cultural degradation.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Alot of people All around the World thinks trump is not smart
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Alot of people All around the World thinks trump is not smart

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Alot of people All around the World thinks trump is not smart

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump is laughed at around the world
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump is laughed at around the world

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump is laughed at around the world

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.
Partially True

Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: California Democrats are not messing around, trying to pick up up to 7 Dem seats
Partially True

Fact Check: California Democrats are not messing around, trying to pick up up to 7 Dem seats

Detailed fact-check analysis of: California Democrats are not messing around, trying to pick up up to 7 Dem seats

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks