Are XCOM 2 Percentages Accurate?
The claim that "XCOM 2 percentages are accurate" has been a topic of debate among players of the popular turn-based strategy game. Some players assert that the displayed hit percentages do not accurately reflect the actual chances of success, leading to frustration and confusion during gameplay. This article will explore the various perspectives on this claim, examining the evidence and sources available.
What We Know
-
Player Experiences: Many players have reported instances where they have repeatedly failed actions that were statistically likely to succeed. For example, one player noted failing an action with a 60% success rate multiple times in a row, suggesting a discrepancy between expected and actual outcomes in the game 1.
-
Developer Insights: An interview with Jake Solomon, the lead designer of XCOM 2, suggests that the game may present inflated hit percentages, particularly on easier difficulty settings. According to Solomon, an 85% chance to hit may actually function closer to a 95% chance 2. This statement implies that the game may have hidden mechanics that influence the perceived accuracy.
-
Community Discussions: Various forums and community discussions reveal a consensus among some players that the hit percentages are not entirely reliable. One discussion pointed out that percentages below 50% tend to be more accurate, while those above 50% may have hidden "aim assist" mechanics that skew the results 5.
-
Game Mechanics: Some sources describe the percentages as "Chance-Not-To-Mess-Up" indicators rather than true chance-to-hit values. This suggests that the game may incorporate additional factors that affect the outcome of actions, leading to a perception that the displayed percentages are misleading 6.
-
Content Analysis: A detailed analysis by SplicedOnline highlights that many players and content creators have observed discrepancies between expected and actual outcomes based on the game's hit percentages. This has led to claims that the game "lies" about hit chances, as players frequently experience misses despite high percentage displays 8.
Analysis
The evidence surrounding the accuracy of XCOM 2's percentages is mixed and requires careful evaluation of the sources:
-
Player Testimonials: While anecdotal evidence from players can provide insight into the gaming experience, it is inherently subjective and may not represent the broader player base. Individual experiences can vary widely based on play style, strategy, and even luck.
-
Developer Statements: The comments from Jake Solomon provide a level of credibility, as they come from a primary source involved in the game's design. However, without detailed explanations of the underlying mechanics, such statements may still leave room for interpretation and skepticism.
-
Community Forums: Discussions on platforms like Steam and OpenXcom can offer valuable insights but are often influenced by the biases of the participants. Players who feel frustrated by their experiences may be more vocal, potentially skewing the perception of the game's accuracy.
-
Game Mechanics Explanations: The assertion that percentages represent "Chance-Not-To-Mess-Up" rather than true hit chances raises questions about the game's design philosophy. If true, this could indicate a deliberate choice by the developers to create a certain gameplay experience, but it also complicates the understanding of how success is calculated.
-
Conflicts of Interest: Some sources may have inherent biases, such as content creators who rely on viewer engagement and may exaggerate claims to attract attention. This highlights the importance of cross-referencing multiple sources to gain a balanced perspective.
Conclusion
Verdict: Mostly True
The claim that "XCOM 2 percentages are accurate" is mostly true, but it requires nuance. Evidence from player experiences suggests that many feel the displayed hit percentages do not align with actual outcomes, particularly at higher success rates. Developer insights indicate that the game may intentionally inflate these percentages, especially on easier difficulties, which supports the notion that players may experience discrepancies. Community discussions further reinforce the idea that while lower percentages may be more reliable, higher ones could be misleading due to hidden mechanics.
However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of the available evidence. Much of the data comes from anecdotal player experiences, which can be subjective and vary widely. Developer statements, while credible, lack detailed explanations that would clarify the mechanics at play. Additionally, community forums may be biased by vocal players who have had negative experiences.
Given these factors, readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information themselves and consider both player testimonials and developer insights when forming their own conclusions about the accuracy of hit percentages in XCOM 2.
Sources
- Do the percentages ever become accurate? :: XCOM 2 General Discussions. Steam Community. Link
- Are XCOM hit percentages accurate? - Gaming FAQ - NCESC. Link
- Accuracy Modifiers & Dropoff - OpenXcom. Link
- Are XCOM 2 percentages accurate? - Gaming Pedia - NCESC. Link
- It's too bad about the percentages being broken. :: XCOM 2. Steam Community. Link
- The X-Com Files online Wiki. Link
- Hit Chance and Crit Chance are Calculated Differently. YouTube. Link
- Does XCOM 2 lie about hit chance? - SplicedOnline. Link
- Mechanics (LWOTC). Link
- XCOM 2 Is (Un)Fair. Giant Bomb. Link