Fact Check: Are Uzi guns illegal?

Fact Check: Are Uzi guns illegal?

Published May 7, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are Uzi Guns Illegal? The claim regarding the legality of Uzi guns is multifaceted, as it varies significantly based on jurisdiction and specific f...

Are Uzi Guns Illegal?

The claim regarding the legality of Uzi guns is multifaceted, as it varies significantly based on jurisdiction and specific firearm classification. Uzi firearms, originally designed for military use, have become a topic of debate in the context of gun control laws in the United States and other countries. This article will explore the nuances of this claim, examining the legal status of Uzi guns and the factors influencing their regulation.

What We Know

  1. Federal Regulations: In the United States, the legality of Uzi firearms is primarily governed by the National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934. Under this act, fully automatic Uzis are classified as machine guns, which are heavily regulated and generally illegal for civilian ownership unless they were registered before May 19, 1986. Semi-automatic versions, however, are legal to own in many states, provided they comply with federal regulations.

  2. State Variations: The legality of Uzi firearms varies by state. Some states allow ownership with minimal restrictions, while others have outright bans or stringent regulations. For example, states like California and New York have more restrictive laws regarding the ownership of certain firearms, including Uzis.

  3. International Context: Outside the United States, the legality of Uzi firearms also varies. Some countries have strict gun control laws that may prohibit civilian ownership of such weapons altogether. For instance, many European nations have stringent regulations that could classify Uzis as illegal for civilian use.

  4. Registration Requirements: In states where Uzi ownership is legal, individuals must adhere to federal laws governing the registration and transfer of machine guns manufactured after the NFA's enactment. This includes ensuring that any modifications to the firearm comply with legal standards.

Analysis

The sources available provide a range of perspectives on the legality of Uzi firearms, but they also exhibit varying degrees of reliability and potential bias:

  • Wikipedia: The entry on gun laws provides a broad overview but lacks specific citations and may not be comprehensive regarding the nuances of Uzi legality. Wikipedia is generally a good starting point but should not be considered a definitive source.

  • Government Sources: The summary of federal firearms laws from the U.S. Department of Justice is a reliable source, as it is an official government document outlining current regulations. This source is critical for understanding the legal framework governing firearms in the U.S.

  • Specialized Websites: Websites like World Population Review and Buffalo Rifles provide insights into state-specific regulations and the classification of Uzis. However, these sources may not always be peer-reviewed or fact-checked to the same standards as government publications.

  • Opinion Pieces: Articles from sites like Vintage is The New Old and ExpertBeacon provide opinions and interpretations of Uzi legality but may lack rigorous citation and could reflect the authors' biases. These sources should be approached with caution, especially when they present unverified assertions.

  • Conflicts of Interest: Some sources may have affiliations with gun advocacy groups or organizations that could influence their presentation of information. It's essential to consider the potential biases of these sources when evaluating their claims.

What Additional Information Would Be Helpful?

To further clarify the legal status of Uzi firearms, additional information would be beneficial, including:

  • Recent Legal Changes: Updates on any recent changes to state or federal laws regarding Uzi firearms, particularly in states with evolving gun control measures.
  • Case Studies: Specific examples of legal cases involving Uzi firearms could provide insight into how laws are applied in practice.
  • Comparative Analysis: A comparison of Uzi legality with other similar firearms could help contextualize the regulatory landscape.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim regarding the legality of Uzi guns is partially true, as it is contingent upon various factors including jurisdiction, firearm classification, and specific state laws. Evidence indicates that fully automatic Uzis are generally illegal for civilian ownership in the U.S. unless registered before a specific date, while semi-automatic versions may be legal in many states, albeit with restrictions. Additionally, international regulations can further complicate the legality of Uzis, with some countries prohibiting civilian ownership altogether.

However, the nuances of state laws and the evolving nature of gun control legislation introduce a level of uncertainty. The available evidence does not provide a definitive answer applicable to all situations, as legal interpretations and regulations can change. Thus, while some aspects of the claim are accurate, others are not universally applicable.

Readers should remain aware of the limitations in the available evidence and the potential biases of sources. It is crucial to critically evaluate information and consult reliable legal resources for the most current and applicable laws regarding Uzi firearms.

Sources

  1. Overview of gun laws by nation - Wikipedia. Link
  2. General Requirements for Firearms Registration | mpdc. Link
  3. Summary of Federal Firearms Laws—October 2023. Link
  4. Uzi - Wikipedia. Link
  5. Uzi Legal States 2025 - World Population Review. Link
  6. Are uzi guns illegal? - The Civil War. Link
  7. Uzi Legality by State in United States December 2024. Link
  8. Are Uzi guns illegal? - Vintage is The New Old. Link
  9. Are Uzi Guns Legal in the US? - Buffalo Rifles. Link
  10. Are Uzis Legal In US? - ExpertBeacon. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donald Trump Jr. was at the New York Stock Exchange celebrating his company, GrabAGun, which markets itself as the “Amazon of guns” and pushes slogans like “Shoot Now, Pay Later”. The venture offers AR-style rifles and a branded “Don Wick” dagger-style handgun and features discount pricing aimed at easy home delivery.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Donald Trump Jr. was at the New York Stock Exchange celebrating his company, GrabAGun, which markets itself as the “Amazon of guns” and pushes slogans like “Shoot Now, Pay Later”. The venture offers AR-style rifles and a branded “Don Wick” dagger-style handgun and features discount pricing aimed at easy home delivery.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump Jr. was at the New York Stock Exchange celebrating his company, GrabAGun, which markets itself as the “Amazon of guns” and pushes slogans like “Shoot Now, Pay Later”. The venture offers AR-style rifles and a branded “Don Wick” dagger-style handgun and features discount pricing aimed at easy home delivery.

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are Uzis illegal?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are Uzis illegal?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are Uzis illegal?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are Uzi and N dating?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are Uzi and N dating?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are Uzi and N dating?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are Uzi and JT still together?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are Uzi and JT still together?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are Uzi and JT still together?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are JT and Uzi still together?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are JT and Uzi still together?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are JT and Uzi still together?

May 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are Uzi guns illegal? | TruthOrFake Blog