Fact Check: Are SSRIs safe?

Fact Check: Are SSRIs safe?

Published May 7, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are SSRIs Safe? ## Introduction The claim under examination is whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are safe. SSRIs are a class ...

Are SSRIs Safe?

Introduction

The claim under examination is whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are safe. SSRIs are a class of medications commonly prescribed for depression and other psychiatric disorders. The safety of these medications has been a topic of extensive research and debate, with various studies presenting differing conclusions about their risk profiles and efficacy.

What We Know

  1. General Safety and Efficacy: SSRIs are often considered first-line treatments for depression due to their safety and tolerability. A resource from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) states that SSRIs are widely prescribed and have a favorable safety profile compared to other antidepressants 1.

  2. Recent Research Findings: A systematic review published in December 2023 found that antidepressants, including SSRIs, are effective and safe for treating depression, even in patients with comorbid medical conditions. However, the review noted a lack of large, high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in many medical diseases 2.

  3. Specific Safety Concerns: A study focusing on the safety of SSRIs in adolescents with ADHD indicated limited evidence regarding the safety of combining SSRIs with other medications like methylphenidate 3. This highlights potential gaps in understanding the safety of SSRIs in specific populations.

  4. Mortality and Hospitalization: Research has suggested that medium-dose fluvoxamine, an SSRI, is associated with reduced mortality and hospitalization rates 4. This indicates a potential benefit, but it also raises questions about the generalizability of these findings to all SSRIs.

  5. Post-COVID Treatment: A study involving post-COVID patients indicated that two-thirds of participants responded well to SSRIs, suggesting they may be beneficial in this context 6. However, the exploratory nature of this study limits its reliability.

  6. Risks with Other Medications: There are concerns about the concomitant use of SSRIs with oral anticoagulants, which has been linked to an increased risk of major bleeding 9. Additionally, a study indicated that long-term exposure to antidepressants, including SSRIs, may be associated with a higher risk of sudden cardiac death 10.

Analysis

The evidence regarding the safety of SSRIs is mixed and requires careful evaluation.

  • Source Reliability: The NCBI is a reputable source for medical information, but it is essential to consider that it may present a somewhat optimistic view of SSRIs due to its focus on their efficacy 1. The systematic review from PubMed is also credible but notes the lack of high-quality RCTs, which is a significant limitation 2.

  • Potential Bias: Some studies may exhibit bias based on their funding sources or affiliations. For instance, studies published in journals with strong ties to pharmaceutical companies may have conflicts of interest, which could influence their findings. The study linking SSRIs to sudden cardiac death was published by researchers affiliated with a hospital, which may introduce bias depending on their institutional perspectives 10.

  • Methodological Concerns: Many studies rely on observational data or smaller sample sizes, which can limit the strength of their conclusions. For example, the study on SSRIs and ADHD used a claims database, which may not capture all relevant clinical outcomes 3. Furthermore, exploratory studies like the one on post-COVID patients lack robust methodologies that are necessary for establishing causation 6.

  • Diverse Populations: The safety profile of SSRIs may vary significantly across different populations, such as adolescents or those with comorbid conditions. This variability underscores the need for more targeted research to understand the full spectrum of risks associated with SSRIs.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim regarding the safety of SSRIs is partially true, as evidence suggests that while SSRIs can be effective and generally safe for many patients, there are notable exceptions and concerns that warrant caution. Key evidence supporting this verdict includes the favorable safety profile reported by the NCBI and the systematic review indicating SSRIs' effectiveness even in patients with comorbid conditions. However, significant limitations exist, such as the lack of large, high-quality RCTs and specific safety concerns in vulnerable populations, including adolescents and those on concurrent medications.

The mixed findings in the literature highlight the need for further research to clarify the safety of SSRIs across diverse populations and conditions. Readers should remain aware that while SSRIs may be beneficial for many, their safety is not universally guaranteed, and individual responses can vary widely. It is crucial to critically evaluate information and consult healthcare professionals when considering treatment options.

Sources

  1. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. Available at: NCBI
  2. Efficacy and Safety of Antidepressants in Patients With Comorbid Medical Disease. Available at: PubMed
  3. Safety outcomes of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in adolescents. Available at: PubMed
  4. Efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Available at: PMC
  5. Treatment of 95 post-Covid patients with SSRIs. Available at: Nature
  6. Safety Profile of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Real-World Settings. Available at: SAGE Journals
  7. Use of SSRIs With Oral Anticoagulants and Risk of Major Bleeding. Available at: JAMA Network
  8. Use of antidepressant medication linked to substantial increase in risk of sudden cardiac death. Available at: ESC

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Are SSRIs safe in pregnancy?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are SSRIs safe in pregnancy?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are SSRIs safe in pregnancy?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Anadius safe?

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are SSRIs bad for you?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are SSRIs bad for you?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are SSRIs bad for you?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is zip extractor safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is zip extractor safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is zip extractor safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is xylitol safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is xylitol safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is xylitol safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →