Fact Check: Are some things unknowable?

Fact Check: Are some things unknowable?

Published May 9, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Are Some Things Unknowable? ## Introduction The claim "Are some things unknowable?" invites a philosophical inquiry into the nature and limits of h...

Are Some Things Unknowable?

Introduction

The claim "Are some things unknowable?" invites a philosophical inquiry into the nature and limits of human knowledge. This question touches on epistemology, the study of knowledge, and raises discussions about what can be known, what cannot be known, and the implications of such limitations. The concept of unknowability has been explored in various philosophical contexts, suggesting that certain truths may forever elude human understanding.

What We Know

  1. Definition of Unknowability: In philosophy, unknowability refers to the idea that some knowledge is inherently inaccessible. This concept is closely related to various philosophical discussions about the limits of knowledge and the nature of truth. Notable works in this area include Nicholas Rescher's "Unknowability: An Inquiry into the Limits of Knowledge," which argues that human cognition is imperfect and that some truths may be beyond our grasp 18.

  2. Fitch's Paradox of Knowability: This paradox suggests that if all truths are knowable, then it leads to contradictions regarding contingent ignorance. It highlights the tension between the existence of truths that can be known and those that cannot, thereby reinforcing the idea of necessary unknowability 2.

  3. Philosophical Perspectives: Various philosophers have engaged with the concept of unknowability, often linking it to broader epistemological concerns. For instance, some argue that acknowledging unknowability can inspire a more imaginative approach to knowledge, suggesting that it should not only be seen as a limitation but also as an invitation to explore 46.

  4. Implications Across Disciplines: The notion of unknowability is not confined to philosophy; it extends to fields like science, ethics, and history. Each discipline faces its own limits in terms of what can be known or understood, prompting ongoing debates about the nature of knowledge and the boundaries of inquiry 56.

Analysis

The sources available provide a range of perspectives on the claim of unknowability.

  • Credibility of Sources: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is widely regarded as a reliable and authoritative source in the field of philosophy, making its discussion of Fitch's Paradox particularly credible 2. Wikipedia, while useful for general understanding, is less reliable due to its open-editing nature, which can lead to inaccuracies 1.

  • Potential Bias: Some sources, such as philosophical journals and articles, may reflect the biases of their authors or the specific philosophical schools they represent. For example, the article from "Philosophical Investigations" emphasizes the discomfort associated with unknowability, which may reflect a particular philosophical stance 6.

  • Methodological Concerns: Many discussions on unknowability rely on abstract reasoning and thought experiments rather than empirical evidence. This can make it challenging to assess the validity of claims regarding what is unknowable. For instance, while Fitch's Paradox offers a logical framework, it does not provide empirical data to support its claims 2.

  • Contradicting Views: While some sources argue for the existence of unknowable truths, others suggest that all truths are potentially knowable given the right conditions. This dichotomy illustrates the ongoing debate within epistemology and highlights the need for further exploration of the topic 10.

Conclusion

Verdict: True

The claim that some things are unknowable is supported by a range of philosophical arguments and concepts, particularly the definition of unknowability and Fitch's Paradox of Knowability. These discussions illustrate that there are inherent limits to human knowledge, suggesting that certain truths may indeed elude our understanding.

However, it is important to acknowledge the nuances surrounding this verdict. The concept of unknowability is not universally accepted, and some philosophers argue against the existence of unknowable truths, positing that all truths could be known under the right circumstances. This ongoing debate highlights the complexity of epistemological inquiries and the need for further exploration.

Moreover, the evidence primarily consists of philosophical reasoning rather than empirical data, which limits the ability to definitively assert the existence of unknowable truths. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and consider the diverse perspectives within this philosophical discourse.

Sources

  1. Unknowability - Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unknowability
  2. Fitch's Paradox of Knowability - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fitch-paradox/
  3. When Feeling Out of Sight: Philosophy's Special Relationship with ... Retrieved from https://search.library.ucla.edu/discovery/fulldisplay/cdi_proquest_journals_2419140467/01UCS_LAL:UCLA
  4. Philosophy's Special Relationship with Unknowability. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/923122
  5. Exploring Unknowability in Philosophy: The Epistemology of Inaccessible Knowledge. Retrieved from https://diversedaily.com/exploring-unknowability-in-philosophy-the-epistemology-of-inaccessible-knowledge/
  6. The Limits of the 'Unknowable' - Philosophical Investigations. Retrieved from http://www.philosophical-investigations.org/2021/11/the-limits-of-unknowable.html
  7. UNKNOWABILITY / Vol. 87, No. 1 (Spring 2020) - socres. Retrieved from https://www.socres.org/post/871-spring-2020-unknowability
  8. Unknowability: An Inquiry Into the Limits of Knowledge. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Unknowability-Inquiry-Into-Limits-Knowledge/dp/0739136151
  9. What is considered to be unknowable? Retrieved from https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/37884/what-is-considered-to-be-unknowable
  10. What Are The Limits of Knowledge? | Issue 159 - Philosophy Now. Retrieved from https://philosophynow.org/issues/159/What_Are_The_Limits_of_Knowledge

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did some studies of hydroxychloroquine poison the patients with 10 grams of hydroxychloroquine?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Did some studies of hydroxychloroquine poison the patients with 10 grams of hydroxychloroquine?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did some studies of hydroxychloroquine poison the patients with 10 grams of hydroxychloroquine?

Aug 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Russian government will fine you for searching some files in the net
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Russian government will fine you for searching some files in the net

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Russian government will fine you for searching some files in the net

Jul 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: are some roblox executors safe
Partially True

Fact Check: are some roblox executors safe

Detailed fact-check analysis of: are some roblox executors safe

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Here's 8 things Congress has enacted that I'd be willing to bet wouldn't have been passed if someone had to say these things on live TV:

Cannot determine - wrong language 4

1. $465,339-Teaching Pigeons to Gamble

2, 2.3m dollars injecting beagles with cocain

3,385k studying duck penises

4, 75k blowiing lizard out of trees with leaf blowers
Unverified

Fact Check: Here's 8 things Congress has enacted that I'd be willing to bet wouldn't have been passed if someone had to say these things on live TV: Cannot determine - wrong language 4 1. $465,339-Teaching Pigeons to Gamble 2, 2.3m dollars injecting beagles with cocain 3,385k studying duck penises 4, 75k blowiing lizard out of trees with leaf blowers

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Here's 8 things Congress has enacted that I'd be willing to bet wouldn't have been passed if someone had to say these things on live TV: Cannot determine - wrong language 4 1. $465,339-Teaching Pigeons to Gamble 2, 2.3m dollars injecting beagles with cocain 3,385k studying duck penises 4, 75k blowiing lizard out of trees with leaf blowers

Aug 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: During the 2020 presidential election, when Joe Biden became the president in the United States, during counting Donald Trump's auditors were not let into the respective buildings in some states, where counting was carried out
Unverified

Fact Check: During the 2020 presidential election, when Joe Biden became the president in the United States, during counting Donald Trump's auditors were not let into the respective buildings in some states, where counting was carried out

Detailed fact-check analysis of: During the 2020 presidential election, when Joe Biden became the president in the United States, during counting Donald Trump's auditors were not let into the respective buildings in some states, where counting was carried out

Aug 8, 2025
Read more →