TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Are smart rings worth it?

Fact Check: Are smart rings worth it?

Published May 9, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are Smart Rings Worth It? The claim under examination is whether smart rings are worth the investment. With the rise of wearable technology, smart ...

Are Smart Rings Worth It?

The claim under examination is whether smart rings are worth the investment. With the rise of wearable technology, smart rings have gained popularity for their compact design and health-tracking capabilities. However, opinions on their value vary widely, with some sources praising their utility and others questioning their effectiveness compared to other devices like smartwatches.

What We Know

Smart rings, such as the Oura Ring, Samsung Galaxy Ring, and others, are designed to monitor various health metrics, including sleep patterns, heart rate, and activity levels. According to multiple reviews, the Oura Ring 4 is frequently cited as the leading model due to its comprehensive tracking features and user experience 234. It reportedly requires less frequent charging than smartwatches, with some models lasting up to a week on a single charge 36.

The market for smart rings has expanded significantly, with various models offering distinct features. For instance, the Ringconn Gen 2 Air is noted for being a more affordable option without a subscription fee, appealing to budget-conscious consumers 9. However, some reviews suggest that while smart rings excel in specific areas like sleep tracking, they may not provide the same level of functionality as smartwatches, which often include more extensive features like notifications and apps 610.

Analysis

Source Evaluation

  1. ZDNet 1: This source is generally reliable and known for its technology reviews. However, it may have a slight bias toward promoting products that are popular or trending in the market.

  2. The Verge 2: This publication is well-respected in the tech journalism field and often conducts thorough testing. The review of the Oura Ring is based on hands-on experience, which adds credibility, but it is essential to consider that the author may have a preference for certain brands.

  3. Forbes 3: Forbes is a reputable source, but it has been criticized for sponsored content. It is crucial to verify whether the rankings are influenced by advertising or partnerships.

  4. PCMag 4: Known for its detailed product reviews, PCMag typically provides a balanced perspective. However, the potential for bias exists if the publication has partnerships with manufacturers.

  5. Gizmochina 5: This source focuses on tech products and may have a promotional angle, particularly if it emphasizes features that appeal to tech-savvy consumers.

  6. TechRadar 6: This site is known for its comprehensive reviews and comparisons. However, it is essential to assess whether the reviews are influenced by affiliate marketing.

  7. Android Authority 7: This source is credible and provides extensive testing results. It is important to consider the potential for bias if the site has partnerships with specific brands.

  8. CNET 8: CNET is a well-established tech review site, but like others, it may have sponsored content that could influence its rankings.

  9. Tom's Guide 9: This source is reliable and often provides practical insights. However, it is essential to critically evaluate the claims made about competing products.

  10. Wired 10: Known for its in-depth analysis, Wired is generally a trustworthy source, but it is important to consider the context in which products are discussed.

Methodology and Evidence

Most reviews are based on hands-on testing, which provides valuable insights into the functionality and user experience of smart rings. However, the methodology behind these tests is not always transparent. For example, how long the devices were tested, the specific metrics used for comparison, and the sample size of users involved in the testing can significantly affect the reliability of the conclusions drawn.

Additionally, many reviews focus on the Oura Ring, which may skew perceptions of the overall market for smart rings. A more diverse range of products should be evaluated to provide a comprehensive understanding of the category.

What Additional Information Would Be Helpful

To better assess the value of smart rings, it would be beneficial to have:

  • Long-term user studies comparing smart rings to other wearables over extended periods.
  • Independent research on the accuracy of health metrics reported by smart rings.
  • Consumer satisfaction surveys that gauge user experiences across different models.
  • Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of smart rings compared to other health-tracking devices.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that smart rings are worth the investment is partially true. Evidence suggests that smart rings, particularly models like the Oura Ring, offer valuable health-tracking features and convenience, such as longer battery life compared to smartwatches. However, their overall utility may be limited when compared to the broader functionality of smartwatches, which provide additional features like notifications and app integration.

It is important to note that while many reviews highlight the strengths of smart rings, they often focus on a limited number of models, which may not represent the entire market. Furthermore, the methodologies used in reviews can vary, and potential biases from sources must be considered.

Readers should be aware that the effectiveness and value of smart rings can depend on individual needs and preferences. As such, it is advisable to critically evaluate personal requirements and consider a range of products before making a decision.

Sources

  1. ZDNET. "The best smart rings of 2025: I tested and found an obvious winner." Link
  2. The Verge. "We tested six smart rings, and there's a clear winner." Link
  3. Forbes. "The best smart rings, according to rigorous testing." Link
  4. PCMag. "The Best Smart Rings for 2025." Link
  5. Gizmochina. "Best Smart Rings of 2023." Link
  6. TechRadar. "Best smart ring 2025: Every discreet fitness tracker tested." Link
  7. Android Authority. "I've tested the best smart rings, and these are the ones I would buy." Link
  8. CNET. "I Put 3 Popular Smart Rings to the Test to Find Which is ..." Link
  9. Tom's Guide. "I just went hands-on with this new smart ring." Link
  10. Wired. "The Best Smart Rings to Rule Them All." Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Alot of people All around the World thinks trump is not smart
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Alot of people All around the World thinks trump is not smart

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Alot of people All around the World thinks trump is not smart

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Many worldwide don't think trump is smart
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Many worldwide don't think trump is smart

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Many worldwide don't think trump is smart

Jul 19, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Wind power is an expensive form of energy that smart countries don’t use.
False

Fact Check: Wind power is an expensive form of energy that smart countries don’t use.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Wind power is an expensive form of energy that smart countries don’t use.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Wind power is an expensive form of energy that smart countries don't use.
False

Fact Check: Wind power is an expensive form of energy that smart countries don't use.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Wind power is an expensive form of energy that smart countries don't use.

Jul 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: smart countries don't use solar or wind
False

Fact Check: smart countries don't use solar or wind

Detailed fact-check analysis of: smart countries don't use solar or wind

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks