Fact Check: Are smart locks safe?

Fact Check: Are smart locks safe?

Published May 9, 2025
Β±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are Smart Locks Safe? ## Introduction The safety of smart locks has become a significant topic of discussion as more homeowners consider these devi...

Are Smart Locks Safe?

Introduction

The safety of smart locks has become a significant topic of discussion as more homeowners consider these devices for enhanced security. The claim under scrutiny is whether smart locks are indeed safe. This inquiry encompasses various aspects, including technological vulnerabilities, user experiences, and expert opinions.

What We Know

  1. Market Growth and Adoption: The global smart lock market is projected to grow significantly, with estimates suggesting an increase from approximately $5 billion in 2023 to over $22 billion by 2033, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 16% to 19.7% depending on the source 48. This growth indicates a rising consumer confidence in smart lock technology.

  2. Security Features: Smart locks typically offer features such as keyless entry, remote access, and integration with smart home systems. Some models are designed with enhanced resistance to lock picking and other traditional break-in methods 35.

  3. Vulnerabilities: Despite their advantages, smart locks are not without vulnerabilities. Reports have highlighted potential cybersecurity risks, such as hacking through Wi-Fi or Bluetooth connections. A 2023 analysis indicated that while many smart locks are equipped with advanced security features, they can still be susceptible to digital attacks 36.

  4. User Experience: User reviews and experiences vary widely. Some users report high satisfaction with the convenience and security provided by smart locks, while others express concerns over connectivity issues and the potential for lockouts due to battery failures or software glitches 35.

Analysis

The evidence surrounding the safety of smart locks presents a mixed picture.

  • Source Reliability:

    • Market Reports: Sources like Fact.MR and Grand View Research provide market analysis and growth predictions, which are generally reliable but may have a vested interest in promoting the growth of the smart lock industry 47.
    • Consumer Reviews: Websites like Vesternet offer insights based on user experiences, but these can be subjective and may not represent the broader population's views 35.
  • Conflicts of Interest: Some reports originate from companies involved in the smart lock market, which could lead to biased interpretations of safety and security features. For example, marketing materials may overstate the effectiveness of security features without adequately addressing vulnerabilities 46.

  • Methodological Concerns: Many studies and reports rely on market analysis and user surveys, which can be influenced by sample size and demographic representation. A more comprehensive understanding would benefit from independent security audits and peer-reviewed research specifically focused on the cybersecurity aspects of smart locks.

  • Contradicting Evidence: While some sources advocate for the safety and convenience of smart locks, others caution against their vulnerabilities. For instance, cybersecurity experts have raised alarms about the potential for unauthorized access through hacking, which is a critical concern for homeowners considering these devices 36.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that smart locks are safe is partially true. On one hand, smart locks offer advanced security features and are gaining popularity among consumers, indicating a level of trust in their safety. However, significant vulnerabilities exist, particularly concerning cybersecurity risks that can expose users to potential hacking.

The context of this verdict is crucial; while many users report satisfaction with smart locks, others have experienced issues that raise concerns about their reliability and security. The evidence is mixed, with some sources promoting the technology while others highlight its risks.

It is important to acknowledge the limitations in the available evidence, as much of it comes from market analyses and user reviews that may not fully capture the broader implications of smart lock security. Additionally, potential conflicts of interest in reporting can skew perceptions of safety.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information regarding smart locks and consider both the benefits and risks before making decisions about their use in home security.

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

πŸ’‘ Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
βœ“100% Free
βœ“No Registration
βœ“Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Alot of people All around the World thinks trump is not smart
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Alot of people All around the World thinks trump is not smart

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Alot of people All around the World thinks trump is not smart

Aug 11, 2025
Read more β†’
πŸ”
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check: Many worldwide don't think trump is smart
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Many worldwide don't think trump is smart

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Many worldwide don't think trump is smart

Jul 19, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check: Wind power is an expensive form of energy that smart countries don’t use.
False

Fact Check: Wind power is an expensive form of energy that smart countries don’t use.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Wind power is an expensive form of energy that smart countries don’t use.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check: Wind power is an expensive form of energy that smart countries don't use.
False

Fact Check: Wind power is an expensive form of energy that smart countries don't use.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Wind power is an expensive form of energy that smart countries don't use.

Jul 10, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check: smart countries don't use solar or wind
False

Fact Check: smart countries don't use solar or wind

Detailed fact-check analysis of: smart countries don't use solar or wind

Jul 9, 2025
Read more β†’