Fact Check: Are QN shoes good?

Are QN Shoes Good?

Introduction

The claim in question revolves around the quality and performance of QN shoes, specifically those produced by the brand On. This inquiry seeks to determine whether these shoes are indeed "good," a subjective assessment that can vary based on individual preferences and experiences. The evaluation of running shoes often encompasses factors such as comfort, support, durability, and performance across various running conditions.

What We Know

On Running, a Swiss company founded in 2010, has gained popularity for its unique shoe designs, which emphasize a "soft landing" followed by a "firm toe-off" 1. The brand's shoes, particularly the Cloud series, are marketed as providing a distinct running experience. Various reviews highlight the following points:

1. Comfort and Support: Many users report that On shoes offer a high level of comfort and support, with some claiming they surpass other well-known brands like Mizuno and Allbirds 3. The Cloudrunner 2, for instance, has been noted for its mild stability and improved build quality, breathability, and versatility 5.

2. Performance Across Models: Different models cater to various running styles and preferences. For example, the Cloudsurfer 2 is versatile for both easy runs and longer distances, while the Cloudboom Echo 3 is tailored for speed 4. Reviews from RunRepeat indicate that the Cloudrunner is particularly appealing for entry-level runners 7.

3. Testing and Reviews: Websites like RunRepeat and Runner's World provide extensive testing and reviews, often comparing On shoes with other brands based on lab testing and user feedback 26.

4. User Experience: Some reviews, such as those from Elisabeth McKnight, suggest that while On shoes may be pricier than alternatives, they are worth the investment for those who prioritize comfort and support 10.

Analysis

When evaluating the claim about the quality of QN shoes, several factors must be considered:

1. Source Reliability: The sources cited include reputable running and gear review websites like Runner's World and RunRepeat, which are known for their thorough testing methodologies. However, it is essential to note that some reviews may be influenced by affiliate marketing or sponsorships, which could introduce bias 29.

2. Methodology: The reviews often rely on both lab testing and user feedback. For instance, RunRepeat emphasizes a combination of expert testing and consumer reviews to ensure objectivity 2. However, the subjective nature of comfort and fit means that individual experiences can vary widely.

3. Conflicts of Interest: Some sources may have commercial interests in promoting certain brands or models, which could affect the impartiality of their reviews. For example, if a website earns commissions from sales of On shoes, this could lead to overly favorable reviews 610.

4. Diverse Opinions: While many reviews are positive, it is crucial to consider dissenting opinions. Some users may find On shoes less suitable for their specific needs, particularly if they have unique foot shapes or running styles that do not align with the shoe's design.

5. Additional Information Needed: To further substantiate claims about the quality of QN shoes, more comprehensive data on long-term durability, customer service experiences, and comparisons with other brands in similar price ranges would be beneficial. Additionally, insights from professional athletes or coaches could provide a more nuanced understanding of the shoes' performance in competitive settings.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly True

The assessment of QN shoes, particularly those from the brand On, is largely supported by user reviews and expert evaluations that highlight their comfort, support, and performance across various models. Many users report positive experiences, suggesting that these shoes can indeed be considered "good" for a significant portion of runners. However, the subjective nature of shoe fit and comfort means that individual experiences can vary, and some users may not find them suitable for their specific needs.

It is important to acknowledge the limitations in the available evidence, including potential biases in reviews due to commercial interests and the lack of comprehensive long-term data on durability and customer service. While the majority of feedback is favorable, dissenting opinions exist, indicating that not all users will have the same experience.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information themselves and consider their unique running needs and preferences when assessing the quality of QN shoes.

Sources

1. Best On Running Shoes 2025 | On Running Shoe Reviews - Runner's World. Retrieved from Runner's World
2. 7 Best On Running Shoes - RunRepeat. Retrieved from RunRepeat
3. On Running Shoes Review — Is It Like Running On Clouds? - The Good Trade. Retrieved from The Good Trade
4. Best On Running Shoes In 2025 - Trail & Kale Running Co. Retrieved from Trail & Kale
5. Cut in half: On Cloudrunner 2 Review (2024) - RunRepeat. Retrieved from RunRepeat
6. ON Running Shoes Reviews - Running Shoes Guru. Retrieved from Running Shoes Guru
7. Cut in half: On Cloudrunner Review - RunRepeat. Retrieved from RunRepeat
8. 10 Best On Running Shoes (Expert Run Tested) - RunToTheFinish. Retrieved from RunToTheFinish
9. Best On Running Shoes 2024 | Buyer's Guide - Fleet Feet. Retrieved from Fleet Feet
10. ON Cloud Shoes Review: Are they worth it? - Elisabeth McKnight. Retrieved from Elisabeth McKnight