TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Are QBs always captains?

Fact Check: Are QBs always captains?

Published May 7, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
Mostly False

# Are QBs Always Captains? The claim that "quarterbacks are always captains" suggests a strong correlation between the quarterback position and the t...

Are QBs Always Captains?

The claim that "quarterbacks are always captains" suggests a strong correlation between the quarterback position and the team captaincy in the National Football League (NFL). This assertion raises questions about the nature of leadership roles within NFL teams and whether the quarterback, often seen as a central figure in a team's offense, is consistently designated as a captain.

What We Know

  1. Team Captain Designation: In the NFL, team captains are appointed by the team and are recognized as leaders both on and off the field. This system was formalized by the NFL Player Advisory Council under Commissioner Roger Goodell 13.

  2. Quarterback Role: The quarterback is traditionally viewed as the leader of the offense and is often responsible for calling plays during games. However, the extent of their leadership can vary, and they may not always hold the title of captain 24.

  3. Captaincy Trends: While it is common for starting quarterbacks to be named captains, this is not a universal rule. Some teams have specific policies or practices that may exclude the quarterback from being a captain 468.

  4. Variability Among Teams: For instance, the Baltimore Ravens have a unique approach where they do not designate year-long captains, opting instead for weekly selections, which may not always include the quarterback 6. Additionally, a recent analysis indicated that while the majority of teams name their quarterbacks as captains, exceptions exist, such as the Atlanta Falcons 9.

  5. Captain Patch: Players designated as captains wear a "C" patch on their jerseys, which signifies their leadership role. This patch is standardized across teams participating in the captaincy program 5.

Analysis

The evidence surrounding the claim that quarterbacks are always captains is mixed and requires careful evaluation of the sources.

  • Source Reliability: The Wikipedia entries 123 provide a foundational understanding of the roles of quarterbacks and captains in the NFL, but they may lack comprehensive citations and are subject to edits, which could affect their reliability. Wikipedia can be a good starting point but should not be the sole source for definitive claims.

  • Credible Reporting: The article from AS USA 4 offers a more nuanced view, explicitly stating that while quarterbacks are often captains, they are not always designated as such. This source appears to be more reliable as it provides context and acknowledges variability across teams.

  • Statistical Insights: The CBS Sports article 6 provides a current overview of team captains and highlights the exceptions to the rule, making it a valuable resource for understanding recent trends in captaincy.

  • Potential Bias: The source from Gaming Pedia 5 is less formal and may not be as rigorously fact-checked, which could introduce bias or inaccuracies. It is important to consider the context in which the information is presented.

  • Conflicting Information: The claim that "the quarterback is almost always a captain" 9 is supported by anecdotal evidence but lacks comprehensive statistical backing. More detailed data on captaincy trends across all NFL teams would enhance the understanding of this claim.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly False

The assertion that "quarterbacks are always captains" is misleading. While it is common for quarterbacks to hold the captaincy role due to their leadership position on the field, there are notable exceptions across various NFL teams. Evidence indicates that some teams do not designate their quarterbacks as captains, and practices can vary significantly from one organization to another.

This verdict acknowledges the prevalent trend of quarterbacks being captains but emphasizes that it is not a universal truth. The variability in captaincy practices and the lack of comprehensive data on all teams contribute to the uncertainty surrounding this claim.

Readers should remain critical of such assertions and consider the nuances involved in team dynamics and leadership roles within the NFL. It is essential to evaluate information from multiple sources to form a well-rounded understanding of the topic.

Sources

  1. NFL team captains - Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_team_captains
  2. Quarterback - Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quarterback
  3. NFL team captains. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League_team_captains
  4. Do NFL teams have captains? - AS USA. Retrieved from https://en.as.com/en/2021/10/19/nfl/1634669002_413389.html
  5. What does C mean in football? - Gaming Pedia. Retrieved from https://www.ncesc.com/gaming-pedia/what-does-c-mean-in-football/
  6. 2023 NFL captains: A look at the leaders for all 32 teams, who is new ... - CBS Sports. Retrieved from https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2023-nfl-captains-a-look-at-the-leaders-for-all-32-teams-who-is-new-to-the-list-and-who-was-snubbed/
  7. Is the Quarterback Always the Captain? - YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY0dOO00NAA
  8. How many captains can an NFL team have? - idswater.com. Retrieved from https://ids-water.com/2021/02/07/how-many-captains-can-an-nfl-team-have/
  9. Bill Barnwell on X. Retrieved from https://x.com/billbarnwell/status/1830644701067964582?lang=en
  10. National Football League team captains - Wikiwand. Retrieved from https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/National_Football_League_team_captains

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: THE CONCEPT OF HELL WAS ALWAYS THERE WITH HUMANITY
Mostly False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: THE CONCEPT OF HELL WAS ALWAYS THERE WITH HUMANITY

Detailed fact-check analysis of: THE CONCEPT OF HELL WAS ALWAYS THERE WITH HUMANITY

Jun 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: black people are always the victim
Mostly False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: black people are always the victim

Detailed fact-check analysis of: black people are always the victim

May 16, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Mostly False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are zwitterions always neutral?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are zwitterions always neutral?

May 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Most Wars are pointless more innocent people die.Settle it peacefully!But, if a person who is causing lots of harm needs to be taken down you almost always have to wage war🤗🤗
Partially True

Fact Check: Most Wars are pointless more innocent people die.Settle it peacefully!But, if a person who is causing lots of harm needs to be taken down you almost always have to wage war🤗🤗

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Most Wars are pointless more innocent people die.Settle it peacefully!But, if a person who is causing lots of harm needs to be taken down you almost always have to wage war🤗🤗

Aug 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Not trying to freak anybody out. I wasn't going to talk about this for a while but is anyone else like looking into the fact that there's 76 volcanoes that are currently erupting. Our polls have moved astronomic. Like they're they're moving faster than they ever have in history. And on top of that we've got the earthquakes everywhere and the fires. We've got earthquakes that are happening at Yellowstone National Park and Santorini which are two of the most massive volcanoes. Like we have the the gases that are 00:31 coming from these different volcanic eruptions that are spreading all over the planet and then on top of that we've also got the solar flares that are hitting the magnetic field of our planet which if it weakens enough can actually cause the the poles to flip. And that's concerning because if you've looked into what happens if that I mean we don't know for sure. It's theoretical. For entertainment purposes only always and forever. Of course. But at Theoretically it wouldn't be good. Who knows? There could be 01:07 like some saving grace. Maybe it won't happen. Maybe it'll just all calm down. But it goes along also with the hopey prophecy. Of the the two brothers or twins flipping and then the weakening and then the the floods and all that that jazz that seems to be And then we've got the airplanes on top of that which could either be maybe from the magnetic field or the solar flares or from the poles shifting. I have no idea. But there's a lot of pl
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Not trying to freak anybody out. I wasn't going to talk about this for a while but is anyone else like looking into the fact that there's 76 volcanoes that are currently erupting. Our polls have moved astronomic. Like they're they're moving faster than they ever have in history. And on top of that we've got the earthquakes everywhere and the fires. We've got earthquakes that are happening at Yellowstone National Park and Santorini which are two of the most massive volcanoes. Like we have the the gases that are 00:31 coming from these different volcanic eruptions that are spreading all over the planet and then on top of that we've also got the solar flares that are hitting the magnetic field of our planet which if it weakens enough can actually cause the the poles to flip. And that's concerning because if you've looked into what happens if that I mean we don't know for sure. It's theoretical. For entertainment purposes only always and forever. Of course. But at Theoretically it wouldn't be good. Who knows? There could be 01:07 like some saving grace. Maybe it won't happen. Maybe it'll just all calm down. But it goes along also with the hopey prophecy. Of the the two brothers or twins flipping and then the weakening and then the the floods and all that that jazz that seems to be And then we've got the airplanes on top of that which could either be maybe from the magnetic field or the solar flares or from the poles shifting. I have no idea. But there's a lot of pl

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Not trying to freak anybody out. I wasn't going to talk about this for a while but is anyone else like looking into the fact that there's 76 volcanoes that are currently erupting. Our polls have moved astronomic. Like they're they're moving faster than they ever have in history. And on top of that we've got the earthquakes everywhere and the fires. We've got earthquakes that are happening at Yellowstone National Park and Santorini which are two of the most massive volcanoes. Like we have the the gases that are 00:31 coming from these different volcanic eruptions that are spreading all over the planet and then on top of that we've also got the solar flares that are hitting the magnetic field of our planet which if it weakens enough can actually cause the the poles to flip. And that's concerning because if you've looked into what happens if that I mean we don't know for sure. It's theoretical. For entertainment purposes only always and forever. Of course. But at Theoretically it wouldn't be good. Who knows? There could be 01:07 like some saving grace. Maybe it won't happen. Maybe it'll just all calm down. But it goes along also with the hopey prophecy. Of the the two brothers or twins flipping and then the weakening and then the the floods and all that that jazz that seems to be And then we've got the airplanes on top of that which could either be maybe from the magnetic field or the solar flares or from the poles shifting. I have no idea. But there's a lot of pl

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Are QBs always captains? | TruthOrFake Blog