Fact Check: Are nhs staff getting a pay rise in 2025?

Fact Check: Are nhs staff getting a pay rise in 2025?

Published May 9, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are NHS Staff Getting a Pay Rise in 2025? The claim regarding a potential pay rise for NHS staff in 2025 has been the subject of various reports an...

Are NHS Staff Getting a Pay Rise in 2025?

The claim regarding a potential pay rise for NHS staff in 2025 has been the subject of various reports and discussions. Multiple sources indicate that there are proposals and recommendations for pay increases, but the situation remains fluid, with no definitive confirmation from the government as of now.

What We Know

  1. Proposed Pay Increases: Reports suggest that independent pay review bodies have recommended a pay rise of approximately 3% for NHS staff under the Agenda for Change (AfC) contract for the 2025-26 financial year 68.

  2. National Living Wage Impact: An increase in the National Living Wage (NLW) effective from April 1, 2025, to £12.21 may affect NHS staff, particularly those in lower pay bands 2. This could lead to higher pay adjustments for staff in Bands 1 and 2.

  3. Government Budget Constraints: The UK government has indicated it may not provide additional funding for pay rises beyond what has already been budgeted, despite recommendations for higher increases from review bodies 3. This suggests that while recommendations exist, actual implementation may be limited by financial considerations.

  4. Union Responses: UNISON, a major union representing NHS workers, has called for the government to act swiftly on these pay recommendations, indicating that delays in confirming pay rises are causing significant distress among staff 510.

  5. Layoffs Amid Budget Increases: Despite a reported £22 billion budget boost for the NHS, there are reports of layoffs among doctors and nurses, raising questions about the sustainability of pay increases in the context of budgetary pressures 4.

  6. Predictions and Speculations: Some sources predict that the minimum pay rise could be around 2.8%, with potential increases for specific bands depending on the NLW adjustments 79. However, these figures remain speculative until officially confirmed.

Analysis

The evidence surrounding the claim of a pay rise for NHS staff in 2025 is mixed and requires careful evaluation of the sources involved:

  • Credibility of Sources: The reports from established news organizations like the BBC 3 and Nursing Times 1 provide a level of credibility, as they are recognized for journalistic integrity. However, some sources, such as jobaaj.com 8, may not have the same level of recognition and should be approached with caution regarding their reliability.

  • Potential Bias: UNISON's statements 510 may reflect a bias towards advocating for higher pay, which is typical for labor unions. Their calls for immediate action could be seen as an attempt to apply pressure on the government rather than an objective assessment of the situation.

  • Methodological Concerns: Many of the claims are based on recommendations from pay review bodies, but the actual implementation depends on government decisions and budget allocations. The lack of definitive timelines and the government's stated reluctance to provide additional funding complicate the situation.

  • Conflicting Information: While some reports suggest that a 3% rise is likely, others indicate that the government may not have the funds to support such increases, leading to uncertainty about the actual outcomes for NHS staff 34.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that NHS staff may receive a pay rise in 2025 is partially true, as there are credible reports of proposed increases, including a recommendation for a 3% rise. However, the situation is complicated by government budget constraints and the lack of definitive confirmation regarding funding for these increases.

While independent pay review bodies have made recommendations, the actual implementation remains uncertain due to financial limitations and conflicting reports about the government's willingness to allocate additional funds. Furthermore, the potential impact of the National Living Wage on lower pay bands adds another layer of complexity to the situation.

It is important to note that the evidence is not definitive, and the predictions regarding pay increases are subject to change based on government decisions and economic conditions. Readers should remain critical and evaluate information from multiple sources as the situation evolves.

Sources

  1. Rumoured 3% pay rise proposed for nurses for 2025-26 - Nursing Times. Link
  2. National Living Wage update - NHS Employers. Link
  3. Ministers face above projected teacher and NHS pay deals - BBC News. Link
  4. NHS lays off doctors and nurses despite £22bn budget boost - The Telegraph. Link
  5. Government must move swiftly on NHS pay, says UNISON. Link
  6. Pay rise update for millions of NHS workers and teachers - Yahoo News. Link
  7. NHS Pay Scales 2025/26 (Expected 3.5% Pay Rise and Band 2/3 Updates). Link
  8. UK Government Faces Pressure for NHS Pay Rise - Jobaaj. Link
  9. NHS Pay Scales 2025/26 (predicted 3.5% pay rise and Band 2/3 pay update). Link
  10. Delays to health workers' pay rise causing huge problems for NHS, says UNISON. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Are nhs nurses getting a pay rise?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are nhs nurses getting a pay rise?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are nhs nurses getting a pay rise?

May 9, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are nhs staff civil servants?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are nhs staff civil servants?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are nhs staff civil servants?

May 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The NHS to be privatised
Partially True

Fact Check: The NHS to be privatised

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The NHS to be privatised

Jul 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are nhs waiting lists coming down?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are nhs waiting lists coming down?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are nhs waiting lists coming down?

May 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are nhs hearing aids any good?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are nhs hearing aids any good?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are nhs hearing aids any good?

May 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are nhs staff getting a pay rise in 2025? | TruthOrFake Blog