Fact Check: Are MRIs covered by insurance?

Fact Check: Are MRIs covered by insurance?

Published May 7, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are MRIs Covered by Insurance? ## Introduction The question of whether Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is covered by insurance is complex and vari...

Are MRIs Covered by Insurance?

Introduction

The question of whether Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is covered by insurance is complex and varies significantly based on individual insurance plans, medical necessity, and specific circumstances surrounding the imaging. This article explores the nuances of MRI coverage, examining various sources to understand the factors that influence insurance reimbursement for this diagnostic tool.

What We Know

  1. General Coverage: According to a document from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), coverage for MRIs is contingent upon the equipment receiving FDA premarket approval and being operated within specified parameters. This suggests that not all MRIs may be covered, depending on the equipment and the context of the procedure 1.

  2. Medical Necessity: A blog post from Superbill indicates that insurance coverage for MRIs typically hinges on whether the procedure is deemed medically necessary. This includes cases where MRIs are required for diagnostic purposes or to monitor existing medical conditions 6.

  3. State Legislation: Some states have enacted laws mandating insurance coverage for specific types of MRIs, particularly for breast cancer screening. For example, a Connecticut bill requires health insurance policies to cover breast MRIs as part of cancer susceptibility screening 2.

  4. Federal Initiatives: There are ongoing discussions in Congress about legislation that would require insurers to cover supplemental breast imaging, which includes MRIs. Advocacy groups, such as the American College of Radiology, are pushing for these changes to ensure broader access to necessary imaging 810.

  5. Medicare Coverage: In Australia, Medicare covers MRIs under certain conditions, particularly when performed in public hospitals or when deemed medically necessary for outpatients 9. This highlights a different approach to MRI coverage compared to the U.S.

  6. Insurance Plan Variability: A document from UnitedHealthcare emphasizes that coverage for MRIs is determined by the specific member benefit plan and applicable laws. This indicates significant variability in coverage based on individual insurance policies 5.

Analysis

The sources consulted provide a mixed picture of MRI coverage by insurance. The CMS document 1 is a reliable government source that outlines the regulatory framework for MRI coverage, but it does not address the variability across different insurance plans. The Superbill article 6 offers practical insights into how medical necessity influences coverage but lacks specific data or case studies to illustrate these points.

The Connecticut legislation 2 and the federal initiatives 810 reflect a growing trend toward mandating coverage for specific imaging procedures, particularly in the context of women's health. However, these laws are not universally applicable and may not affect all patients or insurance plans.

The Australian Medicare system 9 provides a contrasting model, suggesting that government-funded healthcare can lead to more standardized coverage for diagnostic imaging. However, this model may not be directly applicable to the U.S. healthcare system, which is characterized by a mix of private and public insurance options.

The UnitedHealthcare document 5 raises important considerations about the role of individual insurance plans in determining coverage, indicating that patients must carefully review their specific benefits. This variability can lead to confusion and potential financial burdens for patients needing MRIs.

Source Reliability

  • Government Sources: The CMS and state legislative documents are generally reliable as they are official government publications.
  • Healthcare Blogs: While the Superbill article provides useful information, it is essential to consider that blogs may not always be peer-reviewed or fact-checked to the same standards as academic or government sources.
  • Advocacy Organizations: Articles from organizations like the American College of Radiology may reflect a bias toward expanding coverage, as they advocate for their interests. Thus, while informative, they should be evaluated with caution.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The assertion that MRIs are covered by insurance is partially true, as coverage is highly contingent upon factors such as medical necessity, state legislation, and the specifics of individual insurance plans. Evidence indicates that while some MRIs may be covered under certain conditions—such as being deemed medically necessary or mandated by state laws—there remains significant variability in coverage across different insurance providers and plans.

It is important to note that the landscape of MRI coverage is evolving, with ongoing legislative efforts aimed at expanding access, particularly for specific populations like women undergoing breast cancer screening. However, these changes are not uniformly applicable and may not benefit all patients.

The limitations of the available evidence include the lack of comprehensive data on the variability of coverage across all insurance plans and the potential biases in advocacy sources. Therefore, readers are encouraged to critically evaluate their own insurance policies and consult with healthcare providers to understand their specific coverage options regarding MRIs.

Sources

  1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. "NCD - Magnetic Resonance Imaging (220.2)." CMS.
  2. Connecticut General Assembly. "An Act Concerning Required Health Insurance Coverage for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Screening." CGA.
  3. Australian Government. "What we’re doing about diagnostic imaging." Health.gov.au.
  4. Health Resources and Services Administration. "Women's Preventive Services Guidelines." HRSA.
  5. UnitedHealthcare. "Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Site of Service." UHC Provider.
  6. Superbill. "How to use your insurance for MRIs." Superbill.
  7. Intersocietal Accreditation Commission. "IAC MRI - Payment Policies." IAC MRI.
  8. Radiology Business. "Federal law change would require all insurers to cover any supplemental breast imaging." Radiology Business.
  9. Canstar. "How Much Does an MRI Cost in Australia?" Canstar.
  10. Radiology Business. "Lawmakers in 4 states introduce bills requiring insurers to cover supplemental breast imaging." Radiology Business.

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is QC Kinetix covered by insurance?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is QC Kinetix covered by insurance?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is QC Kinetix covered by insurance?

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are MRIs scary?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are MRIs scary?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are MRIs scary?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are MRIs dangerous?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are MRIs dangerous?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are MRIs dangerous?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Biden's former aides covered up evidence of his mental and physical decline.
Partially True

Fact Check: Biden's former aides covered up evidence of his mental and physical decline.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Biden's former aides covered up evidence of his mental and physical decline.

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Mostly True

Fact Check: Are MRIs safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are MRIs safe?

May 7, 2025
Read more →