Fact Check: Are lq9 years?

Fact Check: Are lq9 years?

Published May 9, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
โœ“
VERDICT
True

# Are LQ9 Years? The claim in question pertains to the production years of the LQ9 engine, specifically asking, "Are LQ9 years?" This question likely...

Are LQ9 Years?

The claim in question pertains to the production years of the LQ9 engine, specifically asking, "Are LQ9 years?" This question likely seeks to clarify the time frame during which the LQ9 engine was manufactured and used in various vehicles. The LQ9 is a well-known V8 engine produced by General Motors, and understanding its production timeline is crucial for enthusiasts and those looking to purchase or restore vehicles equipped with this engine.

What We Know

The LQ9 is a 6.0-liter V8 engine that was part of General Motors' Generation IV small-block engine family. It was introduced in 2002 and was produced until 2007. The LQ9 engine was primarily used in high-performance applications, such as the Cadillac Escalade and certain GM trucks and SUVs. Here are some key details about the LQ9 engine:

  1. Production Years: The LQ9 was produced from 2002 to 2007 246.
  2. Applications: It was used in vehicles like the Cadillac Escalade, Chevrolet Silverado, and GMC Sierra 379.
  3. Specifications: The engine produces 345 horsepower and 380 lb-ft of torque, making it a high-output variant of the LQ4 engine 26.

Analysis

The sources reviewed provide a consistent timeline for the LQ9 engine's production, confirming that it was manufactured from 2002 to 2007. However, the reliability of these sources varies:

  • Wikipedia (1): While it offers a broad overview of the LS-based engine family, Wikipedia's open-edit nature means it can be subject to inaccuracies. However, it does provide useful context about the engine family.

  • Cartips Daily (2) and OnAllCylinders (3): These sources are more specialized and focus specifically on engine specifications. They provide detailed information about the LQ9, including its performance metrics and applications. However, it is essential to consider that these sites may cater to automotive enthusiasts, which could introduce a bias towards promoting the engine's performance.

  • Road Sumo (4) and Summit Racing (5): Both sources provide specifications and review the LQ9 engine's features. Summit Racing, in particular, is a reputable source in the automotive aftermarket, which adds credibility to their information.

  • Tahoe Yukon Forum (8): This forum offers community-driven insights and experiences regarding the LQ9 and LQ4 engines. While forums can provide valuable anecdotal evidence, they may also contain unverified information and personal opinions.

  • MyEngineSpecs (10) and Eureka Patsnap (6): These sources provide technical specifications and historical context for the LQ9 engine. They appear to be reliable, but it is always prudent to cross-reference technical data with primary sources or official documentation from manufacturers.

The consistency across multiple sources regarding the production years (2002-2007) lends credibility to the claim. However, the potential for bias and the varying reliability of sources necessitate a cautious approach to interpreting this information.

Conclusion

Verdict: True

The claim that the LQ9 engine was produced from 2002 to 2007 is substantiated by multiple sources, including specialized automotive websites and technical specifications. The evidence consistently supports this timeline, confirming the production years of the LQ9 engine.

However, it is important to note that while the majority of sources agree on these dates, the reliability of the information can vary. Some sources may have biases due to their target audience, and community forums may include unverified anecdotes. Therefore, while the conclusion is supported by credible evidence, readers should remain aware of the potential for inaccuracies in less formal sources.

As with any information, it is advisable for readers to critically evaluate the data and consult multiple sources when researching automotive specifications or any other technical details.

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

๐Ÿ’ก Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
โœ“100% Free
โœ“No Registration
โœ“Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is LQ9 an LS?
True
๐ŸŽฏ Similar

Fact Check: Is LQ9 an LS?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is LQ9 an LS?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more โ†’
๐Ÿ”
Partially True
๐ŸŽฏ Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: Is LQ9 aluminum block?
False
๐ŸŽฏ Similar

Fact Check: Is LQ9 aluminum block?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is LQ9 aluminum block?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: Is LQ9 Gen 4?
False

Fact Check: Is LQ9 Gen 4?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is LQ9 Gen 4?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: Are LQ4 and LQ9 heads the same?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are LQ4 and LQ9 heads the same?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are LQ4 and LQ9 heads the same?

May 6, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: Are LQ4 and LQ9 blocks the same?
False

Fact Check: Are LQ4 and LQ9 blocks the same?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are LQ4 and LQ9 blocks the same?

May 6, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: Are lq9 years? | TruthOrFake Blog