Fact Check: Are jyp idols allowed to date?

Fact Check: Are jyp idols allowed to date?

Published May 9, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are JYP Idols Allowed to Date? The claim that "JYP idols are allowed to date" raises questions about the dating policies enforced by JYP Entertainm...

Are JYP Idols Allowed to Date?

The claim that "JYP idols are allowed to date" raises questions about the dating policies enforced by JYP Entertainment, one of the leading companies in the K-Pop industry. The dating rules for idols vary significantly among different entertainment agencies, and JYP has been noted for having specific guidelines regarding dating for its artists. This article will explore the available evidence surrounding JYP's dating policies, the implications for idols, and the varying perspectives on this topic.

What We Know

  1. Dating Ban Duration: JYP Entertainment reportedly enforces a dating ban for its idols during the first three years of their careers. This policy was originally set at five years but was later shortened to three years, according to multiple sources 58.

  2. Impact of Dating on Careers: The K-Pop industry often views idol dating as potentially detrimental to an artist's career. Fans may perceive dating as a betrayal, which can lead to backlash against idols who enter relationships 36.

  3. Official Statements: Park Jin-young, the CEO of JYP Entertainment, has publicly stated that he advises his artists to focus on their careers during the initial years post-debut, which includes refraining from dating 7.

  4. Variability Among Idols: While the dating ban applies to new idols, there are instances where established idols may have more leeway regarding their dating lives. The specifics can vary based on individual circumstances and the idol's popularity 24.

  5. Comparison with Other Agencies: Other major K-Pop agencies, such as SM Entertainment and YG Entertainment, have different policies regarding dating. For example, YG has been known to have a more lenient approach compared to JYP's stricter guidelines 1.

Analysis

The evidence surrounding JYP's dating policies comes from various sources, each with its own level of reliability and potential bias:

  • Koreaboo: This outlet has published multiple articles discussing JYP's dating policies. While it provides a comprehensive overview, it is essential to note that Koreaboo has been criticized for sensationalism and may prioritize engagement over rigorous fact-checking 23.

  • Proreliant: The article from Insight Proreliant discusses the dating ban and cites Park Jin-young's statements. However, the source does not provide extensive context or references to original statements, which raises questions about its reliability 4.

  • Namhan South Korea: This source mentions the dating ban and its implications for idols, but it lacks detailed citations and may not be as widely recognized as other outlets, which could affect its credibility 5.

  • SCMP (South China Morning Post): This article provides a broader context about the rules K-Pop idols face, including dating bans. SCMP is generally regarded as a reliable news source, which adds credibility to its claims 9.

  • Anonymous Sources: Some articles rely on anonymous sources or general assertions without specific examples, which can weaken the reliability of the claims made 10.

Overall, while there is a consensus among several sources that JYP Entertainment enforces a dating ban for the first three years of an idol's career, the nuances of how this policy is applied and its impact on individual idols can vary significantly.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that "JYP idols are allowed to date" is partially true. Evidence indicates that JYP Entertainment enforces a dating ban for its idols during the first three years of their careers, which suggests that dating is not fully permitted during this period. However, there are nuances, as established idols may have more flexibility regarding their dating lives, and the specifics can vary based on individual circumstances.

It is important to recognize that while some sources provide credible information about JYP's dating policies, others may lack reliability or context. The variability in how these policies are applied to different idols adds another layer of complexity to the claim.

Limitations in the available evidence include the reliance on sources that may not always provide comprehensive or unbiased information. Additionally, the dating policies can evolve over time, and individual experiences may differ significantly from the general rules.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information regarding K-Pop idols and their dating policies, considering the potential for bias and the evolving nature of these guidelines.

Sources

  1. Here's How YG, JYP, And SM Differ When It Comes To Dating Rules - Koreaboo [https://www.koreaboo.com/lists/heres-yg-jyp-sm-differ-comes-dating-rules/]
  2. Does JYP Entertainment Still Have A Dating Ban? NMIXX's ... - Koreaboo [https://www.koreaboo.com/stories/jyp-entertainment-still-dating-ban-nmixx-lily-haewon-respond/]
  3. List Of Entertainment Company That Puts Ban On Idol's Dating - 2023 - Kpopmap [https://trends.kpopmap.com/list-of-entertainment-company-that-puts-ban-on-idols-dating-2023-update/]
  4. Jyp Entertainment Courting Policy - Insight Proreliant [http://insight.proreliant.com/index.php/2023/06/23/jyp-entertainment-courting-policy/]
  5. Is it possible to date a Korean idol? - Namhan South Korea [https://www.namhansouthkorea.com/is-it-possible-to-date-a-korean-idol/]
  6. Idols reveal how their companies regulate dating - KBIZOOM [https://kbizoom.com/idols-reveal-how-their-companies-regulate-dating/]
  7. Park Jin Young Clarifies Dating Ban for JYP Artists - Omona They Didn't [https://omonatheydidnt.livejournal.com/15626605.html]
  8. K-pop's Large 3 companies as well as their dating legislation - Now Group [https://nowgroup.asia/2023/10/30/k-pop-s-large-3-companies-as-well-as-their-dating-legislation/]
  9. No dating, no phones, no food? The rules K-pop idols live by - SCMP [https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/celebrity/article/3110355/k-pop-trainee-rules-no-dating-no-phones-weekly-weight]
  10. Kpop Idols Who Violated Dating Bans - The Giga Brain [https://thegigabrain.com/posts/kpop-idols-who-violated-dating-bans]

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Are K-pop idols allowed to date?
Mostly True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are K-pop idols allowed to date?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are K-pop idols allowed to date?

May 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are K-pop idols allowed to be gay?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are K-pop idols allowed to be gay?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are K-pop idols allowed to be gay?

May 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: All detected text: trump posted 
PSAs, total BREAKING We have just IMPORTANT WIN in our Historic Lawsuit against Minutes, and Paramount. like C and George Slopadopoulos, Corporate Owners knew that they defrauded the American People, and desperate settle. Minutes have today paid and we also anticipate receiving Million Dollars more from the new Owners, similar Programming, over Million Dollars. This another long VICTORIES Fake News Media, who holding account for their widespread fraud and deceit. Wall Street Journal, The Failing New York Times, The Washington Post, MSDNC, CNN, other Mainstream Media Liars, NOTICE that the days them being allowed the American People are GREAT AGAIN!
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: All detected text: trump posted PSAs, total BREAKING We have just IMPORTANT WIN in our Historic Lawsuit against Minutes, and Paramount. like C and George Slopadopoulos, Corporate Owners knew that they defrauded the American People, and desperate settle. Minutes have today paid and we also anticipate receiving Million Dollars more from the new Owners, similar Programming, over Million Dollars. This another long VICTORIES Fake News Media, who holding account for their widespread fraud and deceit. Wall Street Journal, The Failing New York Times, The Washington Post, MSDNC, CNN, other Mainstream Media Liars, NOTICE that the days them being allowed the American People are GREAT AGAIN!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: All detected text: trump posted PSAs, total BREAKING We have just IMPORTANT WIN in our Historic Lawsuit against Minutes, and Paramount. like C and George Slopadopoulos, Corporate Owners knew that they defrauded the American People, and desperate settle. Minutes have today paid and we also anticipate receiving Million Dollars more from the new Owners, similar Programming, over Million Dollars. This another long VICTORIES Fake News Media, who holding account for their widespread fraud and deceit. Wall Street Journal, The Failing New York Times, The Washington Post, MSDNC, CNN, other Mainstream Media Liars, NOTICE that the days them being allowed the American People are GREAT AGAIN!

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Are K-pop idols rich?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are K-pop idols rich?

May 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: this answer is biased "The claim that self-driving vehicles are dangerous and should not be allowed is partially true, as there are concerns about their safety and the technology is still evolving. While some sources highlight the potential safety benefits of automated vehicles, they also acknowledge that the safety advantages have not yet been proven and that human error remains a significant factor in traffic fatalities."
Partially True

Fact Check: this answer is biased "The claim that self-driving vehicles are dangerous and should not be allowed is partially true, as there are concerns about their safety and the technology is still evolving. While some sources highlight the potential safety benefits of automated vehicles, they also acknowledge that the safety advantages have not yet been proven and that human error remains a significant factor in traffic fatalities."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: this answer is biased "The claim that self-driving vehicles are dangerous and should not be allowed is partially true, as there are concerns about their safety and the technology is still evolving. While some sources highlight the potential safety benefits of automated vehicles, they also acknowledge that the safety advantages have not yet been proven and that human error remains a significant factor in traffic fatalities."

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are jyp idols allowed to date? | TruthOrFake Blog