Fact Check: Are IV drips safe?

Fact Check: Are IV drips safe?

Published May 4, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are IV Drips Safe? The claim regarding the safety of intravenous (IV) drips encompasses a broad spectrum of medical practices, including hydration,...

Are IV Drips Safe?

The claim regarding the safety of intravenous (IV) drips encompasses a broad spectrum of medical practices, including hydration, medication administration, and vitamin therapy. While IV therapy is a common medical procedure, questions persist about its safety, potential risks, and the efficacy of certain applications, particularly in non-hospital settings. This article aims to explore the available evidence surrounding the safety of IV drips without reaching a definitive conclusion.

What We Know

  1. Purpose and Common Uses: IV therapy is primarily used to replace fluids and electrolytes, provide medications, and replenish blood volume. It is a standard practice in hospitals for patients who cannot take oral medications or fluids 2.

  2. Risks and Complications: While IV therapy is generally considered safe, it is not without risks. Potential complications include infection, phlebitis (inflammation of the vein), and fluid overload, which can occur if the administration is not carefully monitored 89.

  3. Vitamin IV Therapy: The popularity of vitamin IV therapy has surged, particularly in wellness clinics. However, studies indicate that there is limited evidence supporting the benefits of such treatments for individuals with normal nutritional levels. Risks include the potential for overdose and bypassing the body's natural regulatory mechanisms 67.

  4. Safety Initiatives: The implementation of IV infusion safety systems has been shown to significantly reduce medication errors associated with IV therapy. Such systems are crucial in hospital settings where the risk of high-risk medication errors can be substantial 1.

  5. Financial and Ethical Considerations: The financial costs of IV therapy, especially in non-medical settings (e.g., wellness bars), are often high, and the medical benefits remain unproven for many of these applications 4. This raises ethical questions about the commercialization of IV therapy outside of traditional medical contexts.

Analysis

The sources reviewed provide a mixed perspective on the safety of IV drips.

  • Credibility and Reliability: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) sources 12 are generally reliable due to their peer-reviewed nature and association with reputable medical research. However, some sources, such as wellness blogs 910, may have inherent biases, particularly if they are affiliated with commercial interests in IV therapy.

  • Conflicts of Interest: Websites promoting IV vitamin therapy may have financial incentives to downplay risks and emphasize benefits. For instance, the blog from Olympia Pharmacy 10 could be seen as promoting their services, which may affect the objectivity of the information presented.

  • Methodological Concerns: Many studies cited in the sources lack robust methodologies, particularly those discussing the efficacy of vitamin IV therapy. The absence of large-scale, randomized controlled trials limits the strength of the claims made regarding benefits versus risks 67.

  • Diverse Opinions: While some sources advocate for the safety of IV therapy when administered correctly 59, others caution against its use, particularly in non-medical settings where oversight may be lacking 46. This divergence highlights the need for more comprehensive research to establish clear guidelines and safety protocols.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim regarding the safety of IV drips is partially true. Evidence supports the safety of IV therapy when administered in controlled medical environments, such as hospitals, where monitoring and protocols are in place. However, the safety and efficacy of IV therapy, particularly in non-medical settings and for practices like vitamin IV therapy, remain contentious. Limited evidence exists to substantiate the benefits of such treatments, and potential risks, including complications and ethical concerns, warrant caution.

It is important to recognize that while IV therapy can be beneficial in certain contexts, the lack of robust evidence for its use outside of traditional medical settings introduces significant uncertainty. Readers should critically evaluate the information available, considering the potential biases of sources and the need for further research to clarify the safety and efficacy of IV drips in various applications.

Sources

  1. Intravenous Infusion Safety Initiative: ... (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43752/)
  2. Chapter 23 IV Therapy Management - Nursing Skills (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK593209/)
  3. Comprehensive Guide to IV Drip Therapy: Safety, Risks, and ... (https://www.academia.edu/116059452/Comprehensive_Guide_to_IV_Drip_Therapy_Safety_Risks_and_Ethical_Considerations)
  4. Drip bar: Should you get an IV on demand? (https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/drip-bar-should-you-get-an-iv-on-demand-2018092814899)
  5. IV therapy: Uses, benefits, risks, and more (https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/iv-therapy)
  6. IV Vitamin Therapy: Does It Work? (https://www.webmd.com/vitamins-and-supplements/iv-vitamin-therapy-does-it-work)
  7. IV Vitamin therapy: Understanding the lack of proven ... (https://mcpress.mayoclinic.org/living-well/iv-vitamin-therapy-understanding-the-lack-of-proven-benefit-and-potential-risks-of-this-health-fad/)
  8. Are There Any Risks Associated with IV Therapy? (https://toxandpout.com/are-there-any-risks-associated-with-iv-therapy/)
  9. IV Therapy: Benefits, Risks, and Who Should Consider It (https://agerejuvenation.com/blog/iv-therapy-benefits-risks-and-who-should-consider-it/)
  10. Vitamin IV Therapy Safety, Risks & Benefits (https://www.olympiapharmacy.com/blog/is-iv-therapy-safe/)

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Anadius safe?

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is zip extractor safe?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is zip extractor safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is zip extractor safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is xylitol safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is xylitol safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is xylitol safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is wowroms safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is wowroms safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is wowroms safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is wcoforever safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is wcoforever safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is wcoforever safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →