Fact Check: Are IUDs covered by insurance?

Fact Check: Are IUDs covered by insurance?

Published May 4, 2025
VERDICT
Mostly True

# Are IUDs Covered by Insurance? The question of whether intrauterine devices (IUDs) are covered by insurance is a significant concern for many indiv...

Are IUDs Covered by Insurance?

The question of whether intrauterine devices (IUDs) are covered by insurance is a significant concern for many individuals seeking effective contraception. This inquiry has gained prominence in light of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which mandates certain health insurance plans to cover contraceptive methods. However, the specifics of coverage can vary widely depending on individual insurance policies, the type of IUD, and other factors.

What We Know

  1. ACA Mandate: The ACA requires that health insurance plans cover a range of contraceptive methods, including IUDs, without cost-sharing for women. This means that, in general, IUDs should be covered when prescribed by a healthcare provider 19.

  2. Variability in Coverage: Despite the ACA mandate, coverage can differ based on specific insurance plans. Some plans may only cover certain brands of IUDs, while others may have restrictions based on medical necessity or other criteria 34. For example, if a patient requires a specific type of IUD for medical reasons, insurance must cover it under the ACA 3.

  3. Medicare Coverage: For individuals on Medicare, coverage for IUDs is more limited. Medicare Part B may cover IUDs, but typically only for specific medical conditions, such as endometrial hyperplasia 6.

  4. Out-of-Pocket Costs: Even with insurance, patients may face out-of-pocket costs depending on their plan's specifics. Some plans might require co-pays or have deductibles that affect the overall cost of obtaining an IUD 47.

  5. Brand-Specific Information: Different brands of IUDs (like Mirena and Kyleena) may have varying levels of coverage under different insurance policies. Patients are advised to check their plan's formulary and summary of benefits to understand what is covered 79.

Analysis

The reliability of the sources cited varies. Government sources such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 2 and Healthcare.gov 1 provide authoritative information regarding the ACA's requirements, making them credible. However, some sources, such as those from pharmaceutical companies (e.g., Bayer's sites for Mirena and Kyleena) 810, may have inherent biases as they aim to promote their products. These sources may present information favorably to encourage usage of their specific IUDs, which could affect the objectivity of the information provided.

The variability in insurance coverage is a critical aspect of this claim. The complexity of insurance policies means that individuals must often navigate their specific plan details to determine coverage. This complexity can lead to confusion and misinformation, particularly if individuals rely solely on anecdotal evidence or non-expert sources.

Moreover, the lack of comprehensive data on how many plans comply fully with the ACA's contraceptive coverage requirements raises questions about the overall effectiveness of these mandates. Additional information on the percentage of plans that fully cover IUDs, as well as patient experiences with claims and coverage denials, would be beneficial in providing a clearer picture.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly True

The assertion that IUDs are covered by insurance is mostly true, primarily due to the ACA's mandate requiring coverage of contraceptive methods, including IUDs, without cost-sharing. However, the reality is more nuanced. Coverage can vary significantly between different insurance plans, with some plans imposing restrictions or only covering specific brands of IUDs. Additionally, individuals on Medicare may face more limited coverage options.

It is important to recognize the limitations in the available evidence regarding the extent of compliance with the ACA's requirements and the variability in patient experiences. The lack of comprehensive data on insurance coverage for IUDs means that while the ACA provides a framework for coverage, individual experiences may differ widely.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information regarding insurance coverage and consult their specific insurance plans to understand the details of what is covered. This approach will help ensure that individuals are well-informed about their options and any potential out-of-pocket costs associated with obtaining an IUD.

Sources

  1. HealthCare.gov - Birth control benefits and reproductive health care options
  2. CMS - Contraceptive Coverage Requirements Under Section
  3. Health.com - IUD Cost With and Without Insurance
  4. Legal Clarity - Does Insurance Cover an IUD and What Affects Coverage?
  5. Walk In GYN Care - IUDs: Ordering, placement and insurance FAQs
  6. KFF - Coverage of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Medicare
  7. GoodRx - How Much Is a Mirena IUD Without Insurance?
  8. Mirena® IUD Cost & Insurance Coverage - Official Site
  9. Kyleena® IUD Cost & Insurance Coverage - Patient Site
  10. Mirena® IUD Cost, Ordering & Reimbursement - Official HCP Site

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is QC Kinetix covered by insurance?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is QC Kinetix covered by insurance?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is QC Kinetix covered by insurance?

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are IUDs safe?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are IUDs safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are IUDs safe?

May 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are IUDs painful?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are IUDs painful?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are IUDs painful?

May 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are IUDs hormonal?
True

Fact Check: Are IUDs hormonal?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are IUDs hormonal?

May 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are IUDs effective?
True

Fact Check: Are IUDs effective?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are IUDs effective?

May 4, 2025
Read more →