Are Illegal Aliens Voting in Past Elections?

Introduction

The claim that illegal aliens are voting in U.S. elections has been a contentious topic, often surfacing during election cycles. Proponents of this claim argue that noncitizens are participating in the electoral process, potentially influencing election outcomes. Critics, however, assert that evidence supporting this claim is minimal and often based on misinformation. This article aims to explore the available evidence surrounding this claim without reaching a definitive conclusion.

What We Know

1. Legal Framework: U.S. federal law prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 explicitly states that noncitizens are ineligible to vote in these elections 48.

2. Incidence of Noncitizen Voting: Multiple sources indicate that noncitizen voting is exceedingly rare. A report from NPR states that the evidence suggests a "miniscule number" of noncitizens vote illegally, not in numbers that would sway election outcomes 1. Similarly, the Associated Press has noted that noncitizen voting in federal elections is "incredibly rare" 6.

3. Local Jurisdictions: Some local jurisdictions allow noncitizens to vote in specific elections, but this is not the case at the federal level 6.

4. Claims of Widespread Illegal Voting: A study cited by Just Facts claims that between 10% to 27% of non-citizens may be illegally registered to vote, estimating that this could amount to millions of individuals 9. However, this claim lacks robust verification and is often contested by other sources.

5. Political Context: The topic of noncitizen voting is often politicized, with some Republican lawmakers raising concerns about the potential for noncitizens to vote, particularly in the context of the 2024 elections 8. This has led to calls for stricter voting regulations.

Analysis

The reliability of sources discussing noncitizen voting varies significantly.

• Credible Sources: NPR and the Associated Press are established news organizations known for their fact-checking and journalistic integrity. Their reports emphasize the rarity of noncitizen voting and are supported by data from electoral studies and government reports 16.

• Potential Bias: The Just Facts study, while presenting alarming statistics about noncitizen registration, may have an agenda that aligns with promoting stricter immigration and voting laws. This could introduce bias into their findings, making them less reliable without corroborating evidence from neutral sources 9.

• Methodological Concerns: The claims about the percentage of noncitizens who are illegally registered to vote lack transparency regarding their methodology. For instance, how the figures were derived and whether they accounted for various factors such as legal voting in local elections remains unclear.

• Contradicting Evidence: Reports from various fact-checking organizations, including the AP, consistently highlight that the actual incidence of noncitizen voting is negligible. This contradicts more sensational claims and suggests that the narrative of widespread illegal voting may be overstated 56.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that illegal aliens are voting in U.S. elections is not supported by credible evidence. Key sources, including NPR and the Associated Press, indicate that noncitizen voting is exceedingly rare and does not occur in numbers that could influence election outcomes. While some studies, such as those from Just Facts, suggest a higher incidence of illegal registration, these claims lack robust verification and are often contested by more reliable sources.

It is important to note that the political context surrounding this issue can lead to exaggerated claims and misinformation. The narrative of widespread illegal voting appears to be overstated, as corroborated by multiple fact-checking organizations. However, the limitations of available evidence should be acknowledged; while the consensus points to rarity, the potential for isolated incidents cannot be entirely dismissed.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information regarding this topic and consider the sources of claims, especially in a politically charged environment.