Fact Check: Are framework laptops good?

Published May 8, 2025

•by TruthOrFake

VERDICT

Partially True

# Are Framework Laptops Good? ## Introduction The claim in question is whether Framework laptops are considered "good." This inquiry arises from a gr...

Are Framework Laptops Good?

Introduction

The claim in question is whether Framework laptops are considered "good." This inquiry arises from a growing interest in modular laptops that allow users to upgrade and repair their devices easily. Framework, a company that promotes sustainability through repairable and upgradable laptops, has garnered attention for its innovative approach. However, opinions on the performance, reliability, and overall user satisfaction with these laptops vary widely.

What We Know

Framework laptops, particularly the Framework Laptop 13 (2023), have been reviewed by several reputable sources. Key points from these reviews include:

Design and Modularity: The Framework Laptop 13 is noted for its modular design, allowing users to easily replace or upgrade components such as RAM, storage, and ports. This feature is highlighted as a significant advantage over traditional laptops, which often require professional repair services for hardware issues 1 2 3.
Performance: The laptop is available with both Intel 13th Gen and AMD Ryzen processors, with reviews indicating that both configurations perform well for everyday tasks and some demanding applications 2 4 6. However, some users have reported issues with specific components, such as WiFi connectivity, particularly with the AMD version 10.
User Experience: Reviews from users have been mixed. While many appreciate the build quality and keyboard comfort, others have expressed dissatisfaction with certain performance aspects, such as battery life and driver issues 8 10.
Price Point: The starting price for the Framework Laptop 13 is around $1,049, which is competitive for a modular laptop but may be considered high compared to non-modular alternatives 2 3.
Sustainability Focus: Framework emphasizes sustainability by allowing users to repair and upgrade their laptops, which could reduce electronic waste. This mission resonates well with environmentally conscious consumers 1 3.

Analysis

The evidence regarding the quality of Framework laptops comes from a mix of professional reviews and user testimonials.

Professional Reviews: Sources like WIRED, PCMag, and The Verge provide detailed analyses of the laptops' specifications, performance, and usability. These reviews generally come from established tech journalists and analysts, lending credibility to their assessments. However, it is important to note that some reviews may contain inherent biases, especially if the publication has a history of favoring certain brands or technologies 1 2 6.
User Testimonials: Community reviews and personal experiences, such as those found on the Framework community forum, offer insights into long-term usage. While these accounts can provide valuable information about real-world performance, they may also reflect individual biases and experiences that are not universally applicable 7 10.
Conflicts of Interest: Some reviews, particularly those from The Verge, mention potential affiliate links, which could influence the review's tone and content. Transparency about such affiliations is crucial for assessing the reliability of the information presented 9.
Methodology: The methodology of reviews varies. Some reviews focus on benchmark tests, while others emphasize user experience and subjective opinions. A comprehensive evaluation would benefit from standardized testing across multiple units to account for variability in performance 2 4.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that Framework laptops are "good" is partially true based on the evidence reviewed. The laptops are praised for their modular design, which allows for easy upgrades and repairs, aligning with sustainability goals. Performance reviews indicate that they handle everyday tasks well, although some users have reported issues with specific components, particularly in the AMD version. User experiences are mixed, with some highlighting build quality while others point out shortcomings in battery life and driver support.

However, the variability in user experiences and the potential biases in professional reviews introduce uncertainty. The evidence suggests that while Framework laptops have notable strengths, they may not meet everyone's expectations or needs.

It is essential to acknowledge the limitations in available evidence, including potential biases in reviews and the subjective nature of user experiences. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider their specific requirements when assessing the quality of Framework laptops.

Sources

Review: Framework Laptop 13 (2023) - WIRED. Link
Framework Laptop 13 (2023) Review - PCMag. Link
Framework Laptop 13 (2023) review: The Anti-MacBook gets an upgrade - Tom's Guide. Link
Framework Laptop 13 (2023) Review - RTINGS.com. Link
Framework Laptop 16 review: This is the laptop I'd buy for myself - Tom's Guide. Link
Framework Laptop 13 review: problems fixed, for a price - The Verge. Link
Six month Review - Framework Laptop 13. Link
18 Months with a Framework 13. Link
Framework Laptop 13 (AMD) review: buy this one — if you can - The Verge. Link
Framework AMD 13 - review after one year (disappointment). Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:

"Coffee helps you live longer"

✓100% Free

✓No Registration

✓Instant Results

Comments

Loading comments...

Check another claim

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Partially True

🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are framework laptops good?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are framework laptops good?

Fact Check: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financial Post, by Matthew Lau. "Having left his gig as UN Special Envoy for Climate and Finance to lead the federal Liberal government, Mark Carney is now in a position to focus his and Greta Thunberg’s global climate crusade squarely on Canada. The crusade, Carney boasted back in 2021 while in his previous role, is worth many trillions of dollars. As he told CBC News at that year’s UN climate conference, “We have banks, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies from around the world — more than 45 countries — and their total resources, totalling US$130 trillion” dedicated to transitioning the world’s economy away from fossil fuels. That dollar figure is higher than global GDP. Last month, Carney laid out Canada’s required contribution to his climate ambitions: “Canada must invest $2 trillion by 2050 — about $80 billion per year — to become carbon competitive and achieve Net Zero. However, investments in decarbonisation currently run between $10–20 billion annually.” The implication is that another $60-70 billion a year will need to be wrung out of Canadian businesses and consumers, either through direct taxation and government spending or with regulatory browbeating to push Canadians’ savings and investments into global warming initiatives. Carney has made no effort to hide his agenda to browbeat businesses into joining his and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade. In a 2021 interview he declared, “We need a sustainable economy, and is your business aligned with that? Are your hiring practices consistent with that? Are you developing people in a way that’s consistent with that? Ultimately, what’s being asked of businesses when it comes to climate is, do you have a plan for net-zero? Canada has a legislated objective for net zero alongside another 130 countries.” “A Swedish teenager,” Carney continued, referring to Thunberg, “can figure out the carbon budget and that we have less than 10 years and you have to get to net-zero to stabilize it and if you’re a company and you have purpose, well, what’s your plan? And all these plans need to come together.” This is utter insanity: under Justin Trudeau Canada suffered rapidly declining business investment and now his successor wants the country’s business leaders to take financial planning directives from Greta Thunberg. While the federal government barrels down the road to net-zero impoverishment for Canada, everyone else is looking for the exit ramp. In January, six of the largest U.S. banks — JPMorganChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — quit the Carney-led net-zero banking alliance. Canada’s Big Six Banks — RBC, TD Bank, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank — have quit the initiative as well. Even Europe is beginning to back off on government piling climate obligations onto businesses in the name of fighting global warming. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the EU is watering down its climate accounting policies “amid pushback from member states and companies within the bloc over the new rules, which they say would have increased costs and reduced the competitiveness of their business.” Specifically, regulations previously scheduled for this year would have forced companies “to report in detail on their environmental, social and corporate-governance performance while making significant cuts to the emissions from within their supply chain.” The EU is now dropping, weakening or postponing many of these climate regulations, so that businesses will be able to better “grow, innovate, and create quality jobs.” This is effectively an admission that piling climate obligations and environmental reporting mandates onto businesses prevents them from growing, innovating and creating good jobs. Unfortunately, Mark Carney is all about climate obligations and reporting mandates. The road Canada is currently marching down for climate-related financial disclosures is based on a framework proposed by a task force Carney initiated in 2015. His aforementioned Thunberg-praising interview was not with an environmental journalist, but with Pivot Magazine, which is published by CPA Canada, the accounting industry’s national association. “We cannot get to net-zero without proper climate reporting,” he insisted, speaking of the need for “one core global standard” for climate accounting and reporting. A global climate reporting standard to help push trillions of dollars — yes, trillions with a “T” — from Canadian workers and taxpayers into Mark Carney and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade? After a decade of Justin Trudeau’s ruinous policies weakening Canada from coast to coast, there could be little worse for the country and its economy than a Liberal government led by Mark Carney." The Financial Post Cape Breton Politics Jason Boudreau · 1h · Big numbers in unions. 😁😁

Detailed fact-check analysis of: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financial Post, by Matthew Lau. "Having left his gig as UN Special Envoy for Climate and Finance to lead the federal Liberal government, Mark Carney is now in a position to focus his and Greta Thunberg’s global climate crusade squarely on Canada. The crusade, Carney boasted back in 2021 while in his previous role, is worth many trillions of dollars. As he told CBC News at that year’s UN climate conference, “We have banks, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies from around the world — more than 45 countries — and their total resources, totalling US$130 trillion” dedicated to transitioning the world’s economy away from fossil fuels. That dollar figure is higher than global GDP. Last month, Carney laid out Canada’s required contribution to his climate ambitions: “Canada must invest $2 trillion by 2050 — about $80 billion per year — to become carbon competitive and achieve Net Zero. However, investments in decarbonisation currently run between $10–20 billion annually.” The implication is that another $60-70 billion a year will need to be wrung out of Canadian businesses and consumers, either through direct taxation and government spending or with regulatory browbeating to push Canadians’ savings and investments into global warming initiatives. Carney has made no effort to hide his agenda to browbeat businesses into joining his and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade. In a 2021 interview he declared, “We need a sustainable economy, and is your business aligned with that? Are your hiring practices consistent with that? Are you developing people in a way that’s consistent with that? Ultimately, what’s being asked of businesses when it comes to climate is, do you have a plan for net-zero? Canada has a legislated objective for net zero alongside another 130 countries.” “A Swedish teenager,” Carney continued, referring to Thunberg, “can figure out the carbon budget and that we have less than 10 years and you have to get to net-zero to stabilize it and if you’re a company and you have purpose, well, what’s your plan? And all these plans need to come together.” This is utter insanity: under Justin Trudeau Canada suffered rapidly declining business investment and now his successor wants the country’s business leaders to take financial planning directives from Greta Thunberg. While the federal government barrels down the road to net-zero impoverishment for Canada, everyone else is looking for the exit ramp. In January, six of the largest U.S. banks — JPMorganChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — quit the Carney-led net-zero banking alliance. Canada’s Big Six Banks — RBC, TD Bank, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank — have quit the initiative as well. Even Europe is beginning to back off on government piling climate obligations onto businesses in the name of fighting global warming. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the EU is watering down its climate accounting policies “amid pushback from member states and companies within the bloc over the new rules, which they say would have increased costs and reduced the competitiveness of their business.” Specifically, regulations previously scheduled for this year would have forced companies “to report in detail on their environmental, social and corporate-governance performance while making significant cuts to the emissions from within their supply chain.” The EU is now dropping, weakening or postponing many of these climate regulations, so that businesses will be able to better “grow, innovate, and create quality jobs.” This is effectively an admission that piling climate obligations and environmental reporting mandates onto businesses prevents them from growing, innovating and creating good jobs. Unfortunately, Mark Carney is all about climate obligations and reporting mandates. The road Canada is currently marching down for climate-related financial disclosures is based on a framework proposed by a task force Carney initiated in 2015. His aforementioned Thunberg-praising interview was not with an environmental journalist, but with Pivot Magazine, which is published by CPA Canada, the accounting industry’s national association. “We cannot get to net-zero without proper climate reporting,” he insisted, speaking of the need for “one core global standard” for climate accounting and reporting. A global climate reporting standard to help push trillions of dollars — yes, trillions with a “T” — from Canadian workers and taxpayers into Mark Carney and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade? After a decade of Justin Trudeau’s ruinous policies weakening Canada from coast to coast, there could be little worse for the country and its economy than a Liberal government led by Mark Carney." The Financial Post Cape Breton Politics Jason Boudreau · 1h · Big numbers in unions. 😁😁