Fact Check: Are fj cruisers safe?

Fact Check: Are fj cruisers safe?

Published May 2, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are FJ Cruisers Safe? The claim regarding the safety of Toyota FJ Cruisers has garnered attention among potential buyers and current owners alike. ...

Are FJ Cruisers Safe?

The claim regarding the safety of Toyota FJ Cruisers has garnered attention among potential buyers and current owners alike. With the vehicle's rugged design and off-road capabilities, questions arise about its safety ratings and reliability in various driving conditions. This article aims to explore the available evidence regarding the safety of FJ Cruisers without reaching a definitive conclusion.

What We Know

  1. Safety Ratings: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) provides safety ratings for vehicles, including the FJ Cruiser. According to NHTSA, the FJ Cruiser has received varying ratings across different model years, with some models achieving higher ratings than others 1. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has also tested the FJ Cruiser, awarding it "Good" ratings in several categories, indicating satisfactory performance in crash tests 36.

  2. Common Issues: Some sources indicate that certain model years of the FJ Cruiser may have more complaints related to safety than others. For instance, an article from Rerev discusses specific years to avoid based on complaints filed with NHTSA and ownership reviews 2.

  3. Expert Reviews: Reviews from automotive experts, such as those from Edmunds and Car and Driver, highlight the FJ Cruiser's robust build and off-road capabilities, but they also note that the vehicle's safety features may not be as advanced as those in newer models 410.

  4. Consumer Reports: Consumer Reports provides insights into the FJ Cruiser's safety and reliability, noting that while it is generally regarded as a reliable vehicle, it is essential to consider individual model year performance 8.

  5. Recalls and Defects: There have been recalls associated with the FJ Cruiser, which can impact safety. The specifics of these recalls and their resolutions are crucial for understanding the overall safety of the vehicle 9.

Analysis

The safety of the Toyota FJ Cruiser is a multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration of various factors, including model year, safety ratings, and user experiences.

  • Source Reliability: The NHTSA and IIHS are reputable organizations that provide standardized safety ratings based on rigorous testing. Their assessments are generally considered reliable due to their established methodologies. However, individual reviews from automotive websites like Edmunds and Rerev may carry biases based on the authors' experiences and the specific focus of their evaluations. For example, Rerev's article focuses on which years to avoid, which may lead to a more negative portrayal of certain models without a balanced view of the overall safety record.

  • Conflicts of Interest: Some sources, particularly those that provide reviews and ratings, may have commercial interests that could influence their assessments. For instance, websites that rely on advertising revenue from car sales may present a more favorable view of vehicles to attract potential buyers.

  • Methodological Concerns: While safety ratings from NHTSA and IIHS are based on controlled crash tests, real-world safety can be influenced by factors such as driver behavior, road conditions, and vehicle maintenance. Therefore, while ratings provide a benchmark, they may not fully capture the safety experience of everyday drivers.

  • Additional Information Needed: To further evaluate the safety of the FJ Cruiser, it would be helpful to have more detailed statistics on accident rates involving FJ Cruisers, as well as user testimonials regarding their experiences in various driving conditions. Additionally, a comprehensive analysis of recall data and the effectiveness of remedial actions taken by Toyota would provide a clearer picture of long-term safety.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The safety of the Toyota FJ Cruiser is indeed a complex issue. Evidence from reputable sources like the NHTSA and IIHS indicates that while some model years have received commendable safety ratings, others have been associated with more complaints and recalls. This variability suggests that while the FJ Cruiser can be considered safe in certain contexts, it may not be uniformly reliable across all model years.

It is important to note that the safety features of the FJ Cruiser may not match those of newer vehicles, which could impact its overall safety performance. Additionally, the influence of driver behavior and external conditions on safety outcomes cannot be overlooked.

The limitations of the available evidence, including potential biases in consumer reviews and the lack of comprehensive accident statistics, contribute to the uncertainty surrounding the FJ Cruiser's safety. Therefore, potential buyers and current owners are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider individual model year performance when assessing the safety of the FJ Cruiser.

Sources

  1. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration - Vehicle Detail Search: 2014 TOYOTA FJ CRUISER. NHTSA
  2. Best and worst Toyota FJ Cruiser years — which to avoid. Rerev
  3. 2014 Toyota FJ Cruiser - IIHS-HLDI. IIHS
  4. 2014 Toyota FJ Cruiser Review & Ratings - Edmunds. Edmunds
  5. 2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser Review & Ratings - Edmunds. Edmunds
  6. What Are the Pros and Cons of Owning a Toyota FJ Cruiser? Four Wheel Trends
  7. Toyota FJ Cruiser Safety Ratings - Car Problems, Statistics, and Analysis. Car Problem Zoo
  8. Toyota FJ Cruiser - Consumer Reports. Consumer Reports
  9. TOYOTA FJ CRUISER Safety and Reliability Reviews. Car and Safety
  10. 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser - Car and Driver. Car and Driver

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Are fj cruisers safe?
Mostly True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are fj cruisers safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are fj cruisers safe?

May 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Anadius safe?

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are fj cruisers reliable?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are fj cruisers reliable?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are fj cruisers reliable?

May 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are fj cruisers coming back?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are fj cruisers coming back?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are fj cruisers coming back?

May 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are PT Cruisers good cars?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are PT Cruisers good cars?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are PT Cruisers good cars?

May 7, 2025
Read more →