Fact Check: Are ebikes safe?

Fact Check: Are ebikes safe?

Published May 2, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are E-Bikes Safe? ## Introduction The safety of e-bikes has become a topic of increasing concern as their popularity surges. Reports indicate a sig...

Are E-Bikes Safe?

Introduction

The safety of e-bikes has become a topic of increasing concern as their popularity surges. Reports indicate a significant rise in injuries associated with e-bikes and e-scooters, prompting questions about their safety for riders and pedestrians alike. This article will explore the available data and expert opinions surrounding e-bike safety without drawing a definitive conclusion.

What We Know

  1. Injury Statistics: According to a report from the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), e-bike injuries increased by nearly 21% from 2021 to 2022, with a total of 23,493 injuries reported in 2022 alone, up from 751 in 2017 13. The report indicates that nearly half of all e-bike injuries from 2017 to 2022 occurred in 2022 1.

  2. Demographics and Helmet Use: Research from the University of California, San Francisco, highlights that e-bike riders tend to be older and less likely to wear helmets compared to conventional cyclists. Only 43% of e-bike and e-scooter riders wore helmets, compared to 52% of traditional cyclists 23.

  3. Public Health Concerns: An article from the American College of Surgeons describes e-bikes as an emerging public health hazard, citing local emergency declarations in cities like Carlsbad and Encinitas due to fatalities associated with e-bike accidents 5.

  4. Comparative Safety: A report from The Roundup suggests that e-bikes are generally as safe as traditional bicycles when accounting for their higher speeds. Approximately 78.3% of e-bike users report feeling safe riding on public roads 6.

  5. Accident Trends: Data indicates that e-bike injuries have doubled annually from 2017 to 2022, while e-scooter injuries have risen by 45% each year 210. The CPSC estimates that there were at least 233 deaths linked to e-bike accidents from 2017 to 2022 9.

Analysis

The data presented from various sources indicates a troubling trend in e-bike-related injuries, raising legitimate concerns about their safety. The CPSC report is a primary source, providing a comprehensive overview of injury statistics. However, it is important to consider the potential limitations of this data, including the possibility that increased awareness and reporting may contribute to higher injury counts.

The University of California, San Francisco's findings on helmet use among e-bike riders suggest that lower safety gear usage could be a contributing factor to the rising injury rates. However, the study does not provide a direct causal link between helmet use and injury severity, which would require more detailed research.

The American College of Surgeons' characterization of e-bikes as a public health hazard is significant, but it is essential to note that this source may have an agenda to promote safety regulations or public health initiatives. Therefore, while their concerns are valid, the framing of e-bikes as a "hazard" could reflect a bias towards advocating for stricter regulations rather than an objective assessment of safety.

Conversely, The Roundup's assertion that e-bikes are as safe as traditional bicycles may downplay the risks associated with their higher speeds and the rising injury statistics. This source appears to take a more optimistic view, which could be influenced by a pro-e-bike stance.

Overall, while the statistics indicate a clear rise in injuries, the context surrounding these figures, including rider behavior and safety practices, is crucial for a balanced understanding of e-bike safety.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The assertion regarding e-bike safety is deemed "Partially True" based on the evidence presented. The significant increase in reported injuries, as highlighted by the CPSC, suggests that e-bikes pose safety risks, particularly among riders who may not use helmets. However, the comparative safety data indicates that e-bikes may not be inherently more dangerous than traditional bicycles when considering user perception and riding conditions.

It is important to recognize that while the rise in injury statistics raises valid concerns, the context of these figures—such as increased reporting and the demographics of riders—adds complexity to the narrative. The evidence does not provide a definitive conclusion about e-bike safety, as various factors, including rider behavior and safety practices, play a role in the overall assessment.

Moreover, the limitations of the available data must be acknowledged. The statistics may be influenced by factors such as increased awareness of e-bike usage and reporting practices, which could skew the perception of their safety.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and consider the nuances involved in discussions about e-bike safety.

Sources

  1. E-Scooter and E-Bike Injuries Soar: 2022 Injuries Increased ... - CPSC. Link
  2. Electric Scooter and Bike Accidents Are Soaring Across the U.S. - UCSF. Link
  3. The popularity of e-bikes and e-scooters is soaring, but are they safe? - Harvard Health. Link
  4. E-Bike Accident Statistics 2023 - Goldberg & Loren Personal Injury. Link
  5. Electric Bikes Are Emerging as Public Health Hazard - American College of Surgeons. Link
  6. 51 Official Ebike Statistics & Facts 2025 - TheRoundup. Link
  7. E-Bike Accident Statistics: How Dangerous Are They? - Atlee Hall. Link
  8. E-bike crashes 'emerging as a public health threat,' data shows - WPTV. Link
  9. E-Bike Accident Statistics: How Dangerous Are They? - Atlee Hall. Link
  10. E-Bike And E-Scooter Accidents Are Soaring, Study Finds - Forbes. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Are ebikes safe?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are ebikes safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are ebikes safe?

May 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Anadius safe?

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are ebikes worth it?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are ebikes worth it?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are ebikes worth it?

May 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are ebikes street legal?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are ebikes street legal?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are ebikes street legal?

May 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are ebikes allowed on bike trails?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are ebikes allowed on bike trails?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are ebikes allowed on bike trails?

May 8, 2025
Read more →