Fact Check: Are DPSP enforceable by law?

Fact Check: Are DPSP enforceable by law?

Published May 2, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Are DPSP Enforceable by Law? The claim in question revolves around the enforceability of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) as outline...

Are DPSP Enforceable by Law?

The claim in question revolves around the enforceability of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) as outlined in the Indian Constitution. Specifically, the inquiry seeks to determine whether these principles, which are intended to guide the governance of the country, can be enforced in a court of law.

What We Know

The Directive Principles of State Policy are enshrined in Part IV of the Indian Constitution, specifically Articles 36 to 51. According to Article 37, these principles "shall not be enforceable by any court," yet they are described as fundamental in the governance of the country. The state is obligated to apply these principles while making laws 1345.

The DPSP is often contrasted with Fundamental Rights (FRs), which are enforceable by the courts. While DPSPs are non-justiciable, they are considered essential for the governance and social welfare of the nation 5910. The principles are intended to guide the state in policy-making and are seen as a means to achieve socio-economic justice 69.

Analysis

Source Evaluation

  1. Government Sources: The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) provides a PDF document outlining the DPSP, which is a primary source directly from the Indian government. This source is credible as it reflects the constitutional text 12.

  2. Academic and Legal Analysis: Articles from legal blogs and educational institutions, such as iPleaders and Lawctopus, discuss the implications of DPSP's non-enforceability. While these sources provide useful interpretations and context, they may carry biases based on the authors' perspectives or institutional agendas 689.

  3. Wikipedia: The Wikipedia entry on Directive Principles offers a general overview and is a useful starting point, but it should be approached with caution due to the collaborative nature of the platform, which may allow for inaccuracies or bias 4.

  4. Legal Commentary: Legal articles discussing the enforceability of DPSPs provide insights into ongoing debates regarding their role in governance. For instance, some argue that making DPSPs enforceable could lead to rigidity in governance, while others advocate for their enforceability to enhance accountability 610.

Conflicts of Interest

Some sources, particularly those from legal education platforms, may have an inherent bias towards advocating for legal reforms, including the potential enforceability of DPSPs. This could color their interpretation of the principles and their implications for governance 69.

Methodology and Evidence

The claim that DPSPs are non-enforceable is well-supported by constitutional text and legal interpretations. However, the discussion around whether they should be made enforceable lacks a consensus, with various legal scholars and practitioners presenting differing views based on their interpretations of the Constitution and its application in governance 5610.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The assertion that the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) are enforceable by law is false. The constitutional text explicitly states in Article 37 that these principles "shall not be enforceable by any court." This clear legal framework establishes the non-justiciable nature of the DPSP, contrasting them with Fundamental Rights, which are enforceable.

While the DPSP serves as a guiding framework for governance and is considered fundamental to the state's policy-making, their lack of enforceability means that individuals cannot seek legal recourse in courts based on these principles. The ongoing debate among legal scholars regarding the potential for reform to make DPSPs enforceable reflects differing interpretations and opinions but does not alter the current legal standing.

It is important to acknowledge that while the evidence supporting the non-enforceability of DPSPs is robust, the discourse surrounding their role in governance and the implications of potential reforms is complex and nuanced. The lack of consensus among legal experts indicates that further exploration and discussion are warranted.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider the legal context and implications of claims related to the enforceability of constitutional principles.

Sources

  1. Ministry of External Affairs. "PDF DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY." Link
  2. Ministry of External Affairs. "PART IV DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY." Link
  3. "Justiciability of ESC Rights - the Indian Experience." Link
  4. "Directive Principles." Wikipedia. Link
  5. "Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP)." Drishti IAS. Link
  6. "Enforceability Of DPSPs Under The Indian Constitution." iPleaders Blog. Link
  7. "Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs)." NEXT IAS. Link
  8. "Directive Principles of State Policy - iPleaders Blog." Link
  9. "Scope of Enforcement of DPSPs." Lawctopus. Link
  10. "Directive Principles of State Policy and Its Unenforceability." Legal Service India. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Has Trump declared martial law?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Has Trump declared martial law?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Has Trump declared martial law?

Aug 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are DPSP justiciable?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are DPSP justiciable?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are DPSP justiciable?

May 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are DPSP contributions tax deductible for employees?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are DPSP contributions tax deductible for employees?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are DPSP contributions tax deductible for employees?

May 2, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are NDAs enforceable?
Mostly True

Fact Check: Are NDAs enforceable?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are NDAs enforceable?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are NDAs enforceable in California?
Mostly True

Fact Check: Are NDAs enforceable in California?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are NDAs enforceable in California?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are DPSP enforceable by law? | TruthOrFake Blog