TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Are DGK boards good?

Fact Check: Are DGK boards good?

May 2, 2025•by TruthOrFake
✓
VERDICT
Mostly True

# Are DGK Boards Good? The claim under scrutiny is whether DGK skateboards are considered good by users and reviewers alike. This question arises fro...

Are DGK Boards Good?

The claim under scrutiny is whether DGK skateboards are considered good by users and reviewers alike. This question arises from various reviews and personal experiences shared by skateboarders, which highlight the performance, durability, and overall quality of DGK boards. However, the subjective nature of skateboarding experiences necessitates a careful examination of the available evidence.

What We Know

  1. Durability and Performance: Several reviews emphasize that DGK skateboards are designed to withstand extensive use without significant wear. For instance, one source mentions that DGK boards endure constant tricks without wearing out, suggesting they are stable and reliable for various riding conditions 2.

  2. User Experiences: Personal reviews, such as those from long-term users, indicate positive experiences with specific models like the 8.125" "Bloom" deck. Users report satisfaction with the board's performance over several months, noting aspects like its lightweight construction and aesthetic appeal 35.

  3. General Reputation: DGK skateboards are generally well-regarded in the skateboarding community, with many users appreciating their design and functionality. They are described as suitable for street skating and are available in various styles and colors 56.

  4. Expert Reviews: Some reviews provide scores based on performance metrics. For example, a review of the DGK Viper 8.125 deck rated it 7/10, indicating a solid but not exceptional performance 6.

  5. Market Presence: DGK skateboards are widely available and are often marketed towards street skaters, which may influence their design and durability to cater to this demographic 510.

Analysis

Source Evaluation

  • Credibility: The sources reviewed include personal blogs, skateboarding magazines, and video reviews. Websites like Concrete Wave Magazine and Longboards Guide are generally considered credible within the skateboarding community due to their focus on skate culture and product reviews 23. However, personal blogs and YouTube channels may vary in reliability based on the reviewer’s expertise and potential biases.

  • Bias and Reliability: Some reviews may reflect personal biases, especially if the reviewer has a preference for certain brands or styles. For example, a review that focuses solely on a specific model may not provide a comprehensive view of the brand as a whole. Additionally, video reviews may be influenced by the presenter's style and audience engagement strategies, which could skew their assessments 47.

  • Conflicts of Interest: It is important to consider whether the reviewers have any affiliations with DGK or receive compensation for promoting their products. Reviews from independent sources are generally more reliable than those from affiliated reviewers.

Methodological Concerns

  • Sample Size: Many reviews are based on individual experiences rather than a systematic evaluation of multiple boards or user feedback. This limits the generalizability of the findings, as individual experiences can vary widely based on riding style and conditions.

  • Lack of Standardized Testing: The absence of standardized testing metrics in many reviews makes it difficult to compare DGK boards against competitors objectively. Metrics such as weight, pop, and durability should ideally be assessed in a controlled environment to provide a clearer picture of performance.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the claim that DGK skateboards are considered good by users and reviewers is assessed as "Mostly True." The evidence indicates that DGK boards are generally durable, well-regarded in the skateboarding community, and positively reviewed by many users. However, the subjective nature of skateboarding experiences, potential biases in reviews, and the lack of standardized testing metrics introduce a degree of uncertainty. While many users report satisfaction with specific models, individual experiences can vary significantly, and the overall performance may not be universally exceptional.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information themselves, considering both positive and negative reviews, and to seek out a variety of sources for a more comprehensive understanding of DGK skateboards.

Sources

  1. DGK Skateboards Review – Deck Shred Test
  2. Are DGK Skateboards Good? (Pros, Cons and Performance)
  3. DGK Skateboard Deck Review: A Three-Month Shred Test
  4. DGK Skateboard review! Are they worth it? | PLUS SKATE CLIPS
  5. DGK Skateboard Deck Review - Still Worth in 2022
  6. DGK Viper 8.125 Deck Review: An Overall Good Board
  7. DGK Skateboard Review - YouTube
  8. DGK ALL DAY - BOARD REVIEW
  9. Shop DGK Bloom 8" Skateboard Deck (multi) online
  10. DGK Skateboard Decks - DGK Skateboards Return To The ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Are DGK wheels good?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are DGK wheels good?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are DGK wheels good?

May 2, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Mar 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is LVP flooring good?
Mostly True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is LVP flooring good?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is LVP flooring good?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is LMMS good?
Mostly True

Fact Check: Is LMMS good?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is LMMS good?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Krookodile good?
Mostly True

Fact Check: Is Krookodile good?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Krookodile good?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Klarna good?
Mostly True

Fact Check: Is Klarna good?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Klarna good?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks