TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Are CW shows bad?

Fact Check: Are CW shows bad?

Published May 2, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are CW Shows Bad? A Detailed Examination ## Introduction The claim under scrutiny is whether shows produced by The CW network are "bad." This asser...

Are CW Shows Bad? A Detailed Examination

Introduction

The claim under scrutiny is whether shows produced by The CW network are "bad." This assertion can be interpreted in various ways, including the quality of storytelling, acting, and overall production values, as well as audience reception and critical reviews. Given the subjective nature of "bad," this article will explore the available evidence and opinions surrounding The CW's programming.

What We Know

The CW network, known for its youth-oriented programming, has undergone significant changes in recent years, particularly after being acquired by Nexstar Media Group. This shift has led to a focus on profitability, resulting in a mix of renewed and canceled shows based on ratings performance 16.

Ratings and Audience Reception

  1. Ratings Performance: The CW's ratings have fluctuated, with some shows performing well and others poorly. For instance, "The Flash" has been cited as the network's highest-rated series, averaging a 0.82 rating among adults aged 18-49 5. However, many other shows have struggled to maintain viewership, leading to cancellations 37.

  2. Critical Reception: Websites like Rotten Tomatoes provide rankings and reviews of CW shows. For example, some shows have received critical acclaim, while others have been labeled as subpar 48.

  3. Viewer Opinions: Audience ratings on platforms like IMDb reflect a mix of opinions, with some shows garnering high ratings and others receiving low scores. This disparity suggests that while some viewers enjoy certain CW offerings, others find them lacking 26.

Analysis

The evaluation of whether CW shows are "bad" involves examining both qualitative and quantitative data.

Source Reliability

  • Ratings Data: Sources like IMDb and TVLine provide ratings and audience metrics, which are generally reliable but may not capture the full context of viewer engagement or satisfaction 123. These ratings are influenced by various factors, including marketing and competition from other networks.

  • Critical Reviews: Articles from Screen Rant and other entertainment sites offer rankings based on critic reviews and audience feedback. However, these sources may exhibit bias, as they often cater to specific demographics or fan bases 48.

Methodological Concerns

  • Sample Size and Demographics: Ratings and reviews often reflect a limited demographic (e.g., young adults), which may not represent the broader audience. Additionally, the methodologies for gathering viewer opinions can vary, leading to potential skewing of results 24.

  • Cultural Impact: The CW has produced shows that resonate culturally, such as "Riverdale" and "All American," which have sparked discussions on social issues. However, the depth and quality of storytelling in these shows are frequently debated, leading to polarized opinions 89.

Conflicts of Interest

Some sources may have conflicts of interest, especially those affiliated with the network or its parent company, Nexstar. Their focus on profitability may influence the portrayal of shows, emphasizing successful series while downplaying failures 16.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The assertion that CW shows are "bad" is partially true, as the evidence reveals a mixed landscape of quality and reception. Some shows, like "The Flash," have achieved notable success and critical acclaim, while others have faced significant criticism and low ratings. This disparity indicates that the quality of CW programming cannot be uniformly categorized as "bad" or "good."

However, it is essential to recognize the subjective nature of entertainment and the varying tastes of audiences. The ratings and reviews are influenced by demographic factors and may not fully represent the broader viewer experience. Additionally, the potential biases in critical reviews and the impact of marketing strategies complicate the assessment of quality.

Given these nuances, readers should approach the claim with a critical mindset, acknowledging that while some CW shows may not meet certain standards, others do resonate positively with audiences. It is advisable for individuals to evaluate shows based on their preferences and to consider the broader context of viewer engagement and critical feedback.

Sources

  1. The CW 2024-25 TV Season Ratings (updated 2/14/2025) - IMDb. Link
  2. The CW's Best and Worst Rated TV Shows — 2024-25 Season - TVLine. Link
  3. The CW 2024-25 TV Season Ratings (updated 4/25/2025). Link
  4. Every CW Show Ranked (According To Rotten Tomatoes) - Screen Rant. Link
  5. What Is The CW's Highest-Rated Series? - The Wrap. Link
  6. The CW 2023-24 TV Season Ratings (updated 4/12/2024) - IMDb. Link
  7. The CW TV show ratings - canceled + renewed TV shows, ratings - TV Series Finale. Link
  8. 9 Best (And 9 Worst) CW Shows, Ranked - Screen Rant. Link
  9. The CW's 15 Best Original Shows, Ranked - Screen Rant. Link
  10. CW Renew Cancel Part 2: Good Cop/Bad Cop/Worse - The TV Ratings Guide. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: New Poll Shows Almost Everyone Is Unhappy Under Trump Donald Trump
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: New Poll Shows Almost Everyone Is Unhappy Under Trump Donald Trump

Detailed fact-check analysis of: New Poll Shows Almost Everyone Is Unhappy Under Trump Donald Trump

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: So if Biden’s administration destroyed the files, what the fuck was this "The image shows conservative commentators, including Kash Patel (left, holding a binder), exiting the West Wing of the White House, carrying binders labeled "The Epstein Files: Phase 1".
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: So if Biden’s administration destroyed the files, what the fuck was this "The image shows conservative commentators, including Kash Patel (left, holding a binder), exiting the West Wing of the White House, carrying binders labeled "The Epstein Files: Phase 1".

Detailed fact-check analysis of: So if Biden’s administration destroyed the files, what the fuck was this "The image shows conservative commentators, including Kash Patel (left, holding a binder), exiting the West Wing of the White House, carrying binders labeled "The Epstein Files: Phase 1".

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.
Partially True

Fact Check: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Nick Adams's appointment as ambassador to Malaysia shows Trump's disregard for foreign diplomacy.
Partially True

Fact Check: Nick Adams's appointment as ambassador to Malaysia shows Trump's disregard for foreign diplomacy.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Nick Adams's appointment as ambassador to Malaysia shows Trump's disregard for foreign diplomacy.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: RAND study shows no impact of transgender troops on military effectiveness.
Partially True

Fact Check: RAND study shows no impact of transgender troops on military effectiveness.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: RAND study shows no impact of transgender troops on military effectiveness.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Are CW shows bad? | TruthOrFake Blog