Fact Check: Are couples tying the knot?

Fact Check: Are couples tying the knot?

Published May 8, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Are Couples Tying the Knot? A Fact-Check ## Introduction The claim in question revolves around the current state of marriage in the United States, ...

Are Couples Tying the Knot? A Fact-Check

Introduction

The claim in question revolves around the current state of marriage in the United States, specifically asking if couples are increasingly tying the knot. This inquiry touches on various aspects of marriage trends, including marriage rates, societal attitudes towards marriage, and demographic changes.

What We Know

  1. Marriage Rates: According to the CDC, the provisional number of marriages in the U.S. for 2023 is approximately 2,041,926, with a marriage rate of 6.1 per 1,000 total population. This represents a slight decline from 2022, when there were 2,065,905 marriages and a rate of 6.2 per 1,000 12.

  2. Historical Context: The U.S. Census Bureau indicates that marriage rates have been relatively stagnant over the past decade. For instance, the marriage rate was 16.6 per 1,000 in 2012 and only slightly increased to 16.7 in 2022 4. Furthermore, a report from July 2023 noted that both marriage and divorce rates for women aged 15 and older declined from 2011 to 2021 5.

  3. Public Sentiment: A Pew Research survey cited in a report shows that among unmarried adults, 58% express a desire to marry in the future, while 27% are uncertain, and 14% do not wish to marry at all 8. This indicates a significant portion of the population still values marriage, although the overall rates may not reflect a surge in actual marriages.

  4. Demographic Changes: The refined marriage rate in the U.S. has remained stable, with 31.5 women marrying per 1,000 unmarried women in 2023 6. This suggests that while the absolute number of marriages may fluctuate, the rate at which women are marrying has not seen significant changes.

Analysis

The data from the CDC and Census Bureau provides a reliable foundation for understanding current marriage trends. Both organizations are reputable sources of demographic data, and their statistics are widely used in academic and policy-making contexts. However, it is essential to consider the following:

  • Potential Bias: Sources like Pew Research and Talking Donkey International, while informative, may have inherent biases based on their research methodologies or target audiences. Pew Research is generally regarded as reliable, but its framing of questions can influence responses. Talking Donkey International is less established and may not have the same level of scrutiny in its data collection methods.

  • Methodological Concerns: The marriage statistics from the CDC and Census Bureau are based on reported data, which can be subject to underreporting or misreporting. For instance, cultural shifts and changing societal norms around marriage could lead to discrepancies in how individuals report their marital status.

  • Contextual Factors: The decline in marriage rates could be attributed to various factors, including economic conditions, changing gender roles, and shifting societal values regarding marriage. Understanding these factors is crucial for interpreting the statistics accurately.

  • Need for Additional Information: To gain a more comprehensive understanding of marriage trends, it would be beneficial to have longitudinal studies that track changes in attitudes towards marriage over time. Additionally, data on the reasons behind the decisions not to marry could provide deeper insights.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that couples are increasingly tying the knot is not supported by the available evidence. Key statistics from reputable sources such as the CDC and U.S. Census Bureau indicate a decline in marriage rates in recent years, with the provisional number of marriages in 2023 showing a slight decrease compared to 2022. Historical data further demonstrates that marriage rates have remained relatively stagnant over the past decade.

While a significant portion of unmarried adults express a desire to marry in the future, this sentiment does not translate into an increase in actual marriages. It is essential to recognize that societal attitudes towards marriage are complex and influenced by various factors, including economic conditions and changing gender roles.

However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of the available evidence. The statistics are based on reported data, which may be subject to inaccuracies, and there is a need for more comprehensive studies to understand the nuances behind marriage trends fully.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider multiple perspectives when assessing claims about societal trends.

Sources

  1. CDC/NCHS National Vital Statistics System. Provisional number of marriages and marriage rate: United States, 2000-2023. CDC
  2. CDC. FastStats - Marriage and Divorce. CDC
  3. U.S. Census Bureau. Marriage and Divorce. Census.gov
  4. U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Divorce Rates Down, Marriage Rates Stagnant From 2012-2022. Census.gov
  5. U.S. Census Bureau. National Marriage and Divorce Rates Declined From 2011. Census.gov
  6. Bowling Green State University. Refined Marriage Rate in the U.S.: Geographic Variation. BGSU
  7. U.S. Census Bureau. Marriage and Divorce Data Tables. Census.gov
  8. Talking Donkey International. PDF 61 Marriage Statistics In The US For 2023. Talking Donkey International

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: A total of 12,791 couples married last month — 12,359 heterosexual couples and 432 same-sex couples.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A total of 12,791 couples married last month — 12,359 heterosexual couples and 432 same-sex couples.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A total of 12,791 couples married last month — 12,359 heterosexual couples and 432 same-sex couples.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Kim Davis was jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

She is now trying to get the Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage, likened to Roe v. Wade.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Kim Davis was jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. She is now trying to get the Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage, likened to Roe v. Wade.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Kim Davis was jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. She is now trying to get the Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage, likened to Roe v. Wade.

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Obergefell v Hodges granted constitutional marriage rights to gay couples.
True

Fact Check: Obergefell v Hodges granted constitutional marriage rights to gay couples.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Obergefell v Hodges granted constitutional marriage rights to gay couples.

Jun 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Epigenome editing could allow same-sex couples to have genetic children.
Partially True

Fact Check: Epigenome editing could allow same-sex couples to have genetic children.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Epigenome editing could allow same-sex couples to have genetic children.

Jun 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 4,532 couples filed for divorce: 4,456 heterosexual couples and 76 same-sex couples.
Needs Research

Fact Check: 4,532 couples filed for divorce: 4,456 heterosexual couples and 76 same-sex couples.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 4,532 couples filed for divorce: 4,456 heterosexual couples and 76 same-sex couples.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are couples tying the knot? | TruthOrFake Blog