TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: are clankers gonna take over this worl

Fact Check: are clankers gonna take over this worl

Published August 20, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact-Check Article: "Are clankers gonna take over this world?" ## What We Know The term "clanker" has recently emerged as a derogatory slang for r...

Fact-Check Article: "Are clankers gonna take over this world?"

What We Know

The term "clanker" has recently emerged as a derogatory slang for robots and artificial intelligence (AI), gaining traction on social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram. According to NPR, the term has its roots in the Star Wars franchise, where it was used to describe droids due to the clanking sounds they made. Linguist Adam Aleksic explains that the term has evolved to fulfill a cultural need as robots become more common in daily life, reflecting societal anxieties about AI's increasing presence (Distractify).

A 2023 survey by the Pew Research Center indicates that many Americans are concerned about the implications of AI in the workplace, with 62% believing it will significantly impact workers over the next two decades. This sentiment is echoed by experts who predict that within 15 to 20 years, machines will be able to perform virtually any task currently done by humans, potentially leading to a future where robots are ubiquitous (Axios).

The term "clanker" has also sparked discussions about the anthropomorphization of robots, with some social media users drawing parallels between robot discrimination and historical racial discrimination (NPR). This has led to memes and content that humorously depict a future where robots are treated as second-class citizens.

Analysis

The claim that "clankers" will take over the world can be interpreted in multiple ways. On one hand, the term reflects a growing societal concern about the role of robots and AI in our lives, suggesting that as technology advances, robots may indeed become more integrated into various aspects of society. The widespread use of the term "clanker" indicates a cultural pushback against this integration, highlighting fears of dehumanization and loss of jobs to machines (Rolling Stone).

However, the idea of "taking over" implies a level of sentience and agency that current AI and robots do not possess. As noted by Adam Dorr, director of Research for Rethinx, while AI will enhance productivity and may take over many tasks, it is not inherently a crisis or catastrophe (NPR). The notion of robots "taking over" is more reflective of societal anxieties rather than a literal prediction of future events.

The sources used in this analysis are credible, with NPR and Pew Research Center being well-respected organizations. However, the interpretations of the term "clanker" and its implications vary, with some sources emphasizing the humorous and cultural aspects while others focus on the serious implications of AI's rise.

Conclusion

The claim that "clankers" will take over the world is Partially True. While there is a legitimate concern about the increasing presence of robots and AI in society, leading to fears of job displacement and societal change, the term "clanker" itself is more a reflection of cultural anxieties rather than a prediction of an actual takeover. The use of the term highlights the need for a societal framework to address the implications of AI, but it does not suggest that robots will achieve sentience or control over human lives in the foreseeable future.

Sources

  1. What is a clanker and why do we need this word?
  2. “Clankers”: A robot slur emerges to express disdain for AI's takeover.
  3. What Does Clanker Mean? We've Got the Answer - Distractify
  4. How 'Clanker' Became the Internet's New Favorite Slur
  5. Clanker Slang Meaning: How This Slur Gained Popularity
  6. Why the new word 'clanker' hints at society's skepticism of AI
  7. Clanker | Wookieepedia | Fandom
  8. What Is a 'Clanker'? New Slur for Robots Catches On

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: the U.S. and Israel helped a group take over Syria,
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: the U.S. and Israel helped a group take over Syria,

Detailed fact-check analysis of: the U.S. and Israel helped a group take over Syria,

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump said: We're gonna win so much, you may even get tired of winning. And you'll say, 'Please, please. It's too much winning. We can't take it anymore. Mr. President, it's too much. Will this really happen?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump said: We're gonna win so much, you may even get tired of winning. And you'll say, 'Please, please. It's too much winning. We can't take it anymore. Mr. President, it's too much. Will this really happen?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump said: We're gonna win so much, you may even get tired of winning. And you'll say, 'Please, please. It's too much winning. We can't take it anymore. Mr. President, it's too much. Will this really happen?

Mar 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is trump attempting to take over the country in a self coup
True

Fact Check: Is trump attempting to take over the country in a self coup

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is trump attempting to take over the country in a self coup

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Reality is a flux of endlessly changing phenomena. Concepts freeze this flux and present it as something fixed and stable. This distortion is a lie: we treat unequal things as if they were equal, thereby misrepresenting them. Nearly every word is a concept, and every concept is a simplification of a unique, unrepeatable experience. When we name something, we group many different and unequal experiences under a single term. This act of generalization ignores the actual differences between individual things and moments. Humans invent words generally based on their sensory experience. Those words become concepts, not exact representations. Over time, we forget the metaphorical origin and treat the word as “truth.” Words aren’t truths—just metaphors that have been socially stabilized. Words do not describe the world—they construct a simplified fiction of it, which we often mistakenly call “reality.”
Partially True

Fact Check: Reality is a flux of endlessly changing phenomena. Concepts freeze this flux and present it as something fixed and stable. This distortion is a lie: we treat unequal things as if they were equal, thereby misrepresenting them. Nearly every word is a concept, and every concept is a simplification of a unique, unrepeatable experience. When we name something, we group many different and unequal experiences under a single term. This act of generalization ignores the actual differences between individual things and moments. Humans invent words generally based on their sensory experience. Those words become concepts, not exact representations. Over time, we forget the metaphorical origin and treat the word as “truth.” Words aren’t truths—just metaphors that have been socially stabilized. Words do not describe the world—they construct a simplified fiction of it, which we often mistakenly call “reality.”

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Reality is a flux of endlessly changing phenomena. Concepts freeze this flux and present it as something fixed and stable. This distortion is a lie: we treat unequal things as if they were equal, thereby misrepresenting them. Nearly every word is a concept, and every concept is a simplification of a unique, unrepeatable experience. When we name something, we group many different and unequal experiences under a single term. This act of generalization ignores the actual differences between individual things and moments. Humans invent words generally based on their sensory experience. Those words become concepts, not exact representations. Over time, we forget the metaphorical origin and treat the word as “truth.” Words aren’t truths—just metaphors that have been socially stabilized. Words do not describe the world—they construct a simplified fiction of it, which we often mistakenly call “reality.”

Aug 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Masked ICE goons raid Ventura County Farm in California. KTLA reporter: "It's gonna be at least 100 workers being detained, maybe even a couple of hundred."
Partially True

Fact Check: Masked ICE goons raid Ventura County Farm in California. KTLA reporter: "It's gonna be at least 100 workers being detained, maybe even a couple of hundred."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Masked ICE goons raid Ventura County Farm in California. KTLA reporter: "It's gonna be at least 100 workers being detained, maybe even a couple of hundred."

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: are clankers gonna take over this worl | TruthOrFake Blog