TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Are cgp books good for gcse?

Fact Check: Are cgp books good for gcse?

Published May 8, 2025
by TruthOrFake
✓
VERDICT
Mostly True

# Are CGP Books Good for GCSE? The claim in question revolves around the effectiveness and quality of CGP books as resources for GCSE (General Certif...

Are CGP Books Good for GCSE?

The claim in question revolves around the effectiveness and quality of CGP books as resources for GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education) revision. CGP, or Coordination Group Publications, is a well-known publisher of educational materials in the UK, particularly revision guides and textbooks aimed at students preparing for their GCSEs. The inquiry seeks to determine whether these books are indeed beneficial for students in their exam preparations.

What We Know

  1. Popularity and Usage: CGP books are widely utilized in schools and by students across the UK. They are often praised for their engaging presentation and user-friendly layout, which many find helpful for learning and revision 148.

  2. Content Quality: Reviews suggest that CGP books cover a broad range of subjects and provide concise notes, practice questions, and summaries that are aligned with the GCSE curriculum. For instance, one review highlights that the CGP GCSE English Literature Complete Revision & Practice book is well-regarded for its clear summaries and analysis 9.

  3. Student Feedback: On platforms like The Student Room, students have expressed mixed opinions. While many endorse CGP books as superior to other revision guides, some critique them for being overly simplistic in certain subjects, particularly mathematics 46.

  4. Critical Perspectives: Some educators and reviewers argue that revision guides, including those from CGP, may oversimplify complex topics, stripping away necessary detail and nuance. This perspective suggests that while CGP books may be useful for quick revision, they might not be sufficient for in-depth understanding 5.

  5. Market Position: CGP is recognized as a leading brand in the educational publishing sector, with a significant number of positive reviews across various platforms. ReviewMeta, for example, analyzes thousands of reviews and indicates a generally favorable reception of CGP products 7.

Analysis

The evidence surrounding the effectiveness of CGP books for GCSE revision is largely anecdotal, relying on user reviews and personal testimonials. While these sources provide insight into student experiences, they also present challenges in terms of reliability:

  • Subjectivity of Reviews: Customer reviews, such as those on Trustpilot and Goodreads, can be influenced by personal biases and individual learning styles. Positive reviews may reflect a specific demographic of students who find the books particularly helpful, while negative reviews may come from those who prefer different learning methods 13.

  • Potential Conflicts of Interest: Some sources, such as educational blogs and websites promoting CGP books, may have a vested interest in endorsing these materials, which could skew their evaluations. For instance, Lessonwise and OStado may present CGP books favorably to attract readers or generate affiliate revenue 89.

  • Lack of Empirical Evidence: While many reviews and testimonials support the effectiveness of CGP books, there is a lack of empirical studies or educational research that rigorously evaluates the impact of these books on student performance in GCSE exams. This absence of quantitative data raises questions about the generalizability of the claims made by users 5.

  • Variability Across Subjects: The effectiveness of CGP books may vary significantly depending on the subject matter. For example, while students report satisfaction with subjects like English and Science, there are concerns about the depth of coverage in subjects like Mathematics 46.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly True

The claim that CGP books are good for GCSE revision is mostly true, as evidenced by their widespread popularity and generally favorable reviews from students. Many users appreciate the engaging presentation and alignment with the GCSE curriculum, particularly in subjects like English and Science. However, there are notable criticisms regarding the oversimplification of complex topics, especially in subjects such as Mathematics.

This verdict acknowledges that while CGP books can be beneficial for quick revision, they may not provide the depth required for comprehensive understanding in all subjects. Additionally, the reliance on anecdotal evidence and subjective reviews introduces uncertainty regarding the overall effectiveness of these materials.

Readers should be aware of these limitations and critically evaluate the information available, considering their own learning preferences and the specific subjects they are studying.

Sources

  1. C Reviews | Read Customer Service Reviews of www.cgpbooks.co.uk. Retrieved from Trustpilot
  2. How to Revise for GCSE: Study Skills & Planner - Amazon. Retrieved from Amazon
  3. How to Revise for GCSE: Study Skills & Planner - Goodreads. Retrieved from Goodreads
  4. Are CGP books helpful? - The Student Room. Retrieved from The Student Room
  5. Revision Guides: Why I don’t like them and what you should do instead. Retrieved from Life More Extraordinary
  6. Are CGP books good for AS levels? - The Student Room. Retrieved from The Student Room
  7. CGP Books: 4,036 Reviews of 44 Products - ReviewMeta. Retrieved from ReviewMeta
  8. The Best GCSE Revision Books for 2025 - Lessonwise. Retrieved from Lessonwise
  9. Ace Your Exams With This List of Best Revision Books for GCSE - OStado. Retrieved from OStado
  10. AQA Revision Guide Grade 9-1 Course: CGP Books - Amazon. Retrieved from Amazon

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Are cgp books good for gcse?
Mostly True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are cgp books good for gcse?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are cgp books good for gcse?

May 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are cgp books good for a level?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are cgp books good for a level?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are cgp books good for a level?

May 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are cgp books good for a level?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are cgp books good for a level?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are cgp books good for a level?

May 2, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Mar 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Anthropic faces trial for storing over 7 million pirated books.
True

Fact Check: Anthropic faces trial for storing over 7 million pirated books.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Anthropic faces trial for storing over 7 million pirated books.

Jun 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Authors fear publishing books by people of color could lead to bans.
True

Fact Check: Authors fear publishing books by people of color could lead to bans.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Authors fear publishing books by people of color could lead to bans.

Jun 20, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks