Fact Check: Are cgms covered by insurance?

Published May 2, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Are Continuous Glucose Monitors Covered by Insurance? ## Introduction The claim in question is whether continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are cover...

Are Continuous Glucose Monitors Covered by Insurance?

Introduction

The claim in question is whether continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are covered by insurance. This topic is particularly relevant for individuals with diabetes who rely on these devices for effective blood sugar management. The coverage of CGMs can vary significantly based on factors such as the type of insurance, the specific device, and the medical necessity as determined by healthcare providers.

What We Know

  1. Medicare Coverage: According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare may cover CGMs if they are deemed medically necessary by a healthcare provider. Coverage typically requires that patients have diabetes and meet specific eligibility criteria, such as documenting routine blood glucose monitoring using fingersticks 23.

  2. Eligibility Requirements: A study published in the Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology outlines that individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) must perform a minimum number of fingerstick blood glucose tests to qualify for CGM coverage 1.

  3. Variability in Insurance Plans: Coverage for CGMs can differ widely among private insurance plans. Some plans may cover CGMs fully, while others may require co-pays or have specific criteria that must be met 35.

  4. Recent Changes: The American Diabetes Association reported that as of March 2023, CMS announced expanded coverage for CGMs, which may affect the eligibility of more patients under Medicare 8.

  5. Resources for Coverage: Various online resources provide guidance on how to navigate insurance requirements for CGM coverage, including documentation and appeals processes 46.

Analysis

Source Evaluation

  • Peer-Reviewed Research: The study from PMC provides a solid foundation for understanding the eligibility requirements for CGM coverage, as it is peer-reviewed and cites relevant medical guidelines 1. However, it may not cover the most recent changes in policy.

  • Government Sources: The Medicare.gov website is a reliable source for understanding federal coverage policies, as it is an official government resource 2. It provides clear information about the conditions under which CGMs are covered, but it may not address all private insurance scenarios.

  • Health Information Websites: GoodRx and Legal Clarity provide practical insights into how different insurance plans handle CGM coverage. However, these sources may have a bias toward promoting their services or products related to diabetes management 345.

  • Advocacy Organizations: The American Diabetes Association offers updated information on coverage changes, which is valuable for understanding the evolving landscape of CGM insurance 8. However, as an advocacy group, it may have an agenda that influences the presentation of information.

Conflicts of Interest

Some sources, particularly those associated with commercial entities (like FreeStyle Libre), may have a vested interest in promoting CGMs, which could affect the objectivity of the information provided 10.

Methodology and Evidence

The evidence regarding CGM coverage is largely based on policy statements and eligibility criteria rather than direct patient experiences or outcomes. Additional qualitative data, such as patient testimonials or case studies, could provide a more comprehensive view of the real-world implications of insurance coverage.

What Additional Information Would Be Helpful?

  • Patient Experiences: Gathering firsthand accounts from patients regarding their experiences with insurance coverage for CGMs could provide valuable insights into the practical challenges and successes they face.

  • State-Specific Regulations: Insurance coverage can vary significantly by state, so detailed information on state-specific policies would enhance understanding.

  • Comparative Analysis: A comparative analysis of CGM coverage across different insurance providers would help clarify the landscape for patients seeking coverage.

Conclusion

Verdict: True

The evidence indicates that continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) can be covered by insurance, particularly under Medicare, provided that certain medical necessity criteria are met. Key evidence supporting this conclusion includes the guidelines from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), which outline eligibility requirements for coverage, and recent policy changes that have expanded access for patients. Additionally, variability in coverage among private insurance plans has been documented, indicating that while coverage is possible, it is not uniform across all plans.

However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations in the available evidence. Much of the information is based on policy statements rather than direct patient experiences, and the landscape of insurance coverage can change frequently. Furthermore, individual experiences may vary significantly based on specific insurance plans and state regulations.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and consult with their healthcare providers and insurance representatives to understand their specific coverage options for CGMs.

Sources

  1. Current Eligibility Requirements for CGM Coverage Are ... (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7047118/)
  2. Therapeutic Continuous Glucose Monitors Coverage (https://www.medicare.gov/coverage/therapeutic-continuous-glucose-monitors)
  3. Does Insurance Cover Diabetes Monitoring Devices? - GoodRx (https://www.goodrx.com/conditions/diabetes/diabetes-monitoring-devices)
  4. How to Get Continuous Glucose Monitors Covered by Insurance (https://legalclarity.org/how-to-get-continuous-glucose-monitors-covered-by-insurance/)
  5. Does Insurance Cover Continuous Glucose Monitors? (https://legalclarity.org/does-insurance-cover-continuous-glucose-monitors/)
  6. Is Your Continuous Glucose Monitor Covered by Insurance? Here's How to ... (https://www.promed-dme.com/resource/continuous-glucose-monitor-insurance)
  7. CGM Insurance Coverage Look-Up Tool (https://www.adces.org/education/danatech/glucose-monitoring/continuous-glucose-monitors-(cgm)/cgm-insurance-coverage-look-up)
  8. FAQs on CGM Coverage Criteria Changes in Medicare (https://diabetes.org/advocacy/cgm-continuous-glucose-monitors/faqs-medicare-coverage)
  9. How to Get Insurance to Pay for a Glucose Monitor (https://legalclarity.org/how-to-get-insurance-to-pay-for-a-glucose-monitor/)
  10. Cost and Insurance Coverage | FreeStyle Libre US (https://www.freestyle.abbott/us-en/cost.html?srsltid=AfmBOoqslUk2LyjPr1JtKh8OJ1OLdWOyV5TvvsdynUw0yG5Ft17yfvtb)

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are cgms covered by insurance?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are cgms covered by insurance?

May 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is QC Kinetix covered by insurance?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is QC Kinetix covered by insurance?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is QC Kinetix covered by insurance?

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Approximately 71% of the Earth's surface is covered by water.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Approximately 71% of the Earth's surface is covered by water.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Approximately 71% of the Earth's surface is covered by water.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is NRG Stadium covered?
True

Fact Check: Is NRG Stadium covered?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is NRG Stadium covered?

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are cgms accurate?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are cgms accurate?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are cgms accurate?

May 8, 2025
Read more →