Fact Check: Are cfcs still used?

Fact Check: Are cfcs still used?

Published May 8, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are CFCs Still Used? The claim in question is whether chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are still being used today, despite the global ban established by ...

Are CFCs Still Used?

The claim in question is whether chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are still being used today, despite the global ban established by the Montreal Protocol. This question arises from recent reports indicating that certain CFCs have been detected in the atmosphere at increasing levels, suggesting that they may still be in use or being released through other means.

What We Know

  1. Montreal Protocol: The Montreal Protocol, established in 1987, aimed to phase out substances that deplete the ozone layer, including CFCs. The production and consumption of many CFCs were banned globally by 2010 14.

  2. Current Atmospheric Levels: Despite the ban, studies indicate that certain CFCs, specifically CFC-112a, CFC-113, CFC-113a, CFC-114a, and CFC-115, have seen an increase in atmospheric concentrations since 2010 567. This suggests ongoing emissions from sources that are not fully accounted for.

  3. Sources of Emissions: Research indicates that some of these emissions may come from the breakdown of older equipment, such as discarded refrigerators, or from industrial processes where CFCs are inadvertently released 69.

  4. Concentration in the Atmosphere: CFCs currently make up a small fraction of the atmosphere, approximately four parts per billion, but their potency as greenhouse gases means they still have a significant impact on climate change 3.

  5. Unexplained Emissions: Some emissions of CFCs remain unexplained, raising questions about potential illegal production or use, or incomplete reactions in chemical manufacturing processes 96.

Analysis

The evidence surrounding the claim that CFCs are still in use is complex and multifaceted.

  • Source Reliability: The sources cited include reputable scientific studies and reports from established institutions such as NOAA and Nature. However, it is essential to consider the potential biases in reporting. For example, articles from New Scientist and ABC News may emphasize alarming trends to attract readership, which could skew public perception 56.

  • Methodology Concerns: The studies measuring atmospheric concentrations rely on data from specific monitoring sites, which may not capture global emissions comprehensively. The methodologies used to attribute increases in CFC levels to specific sources can also be complex and may involve assumptions that could affect the conclusions drawn 45.

  • Conflicts of Interest: Some sources may have affiliations with environmental organizations or industries that could influence their reporting. For instance, organizations advocating for stricter environmental regulations might emphasize the dangers of CFCs to bolster their arguments for policy changes.

  • Need for Additional Information: To fully understand the current status of CFCs, more comprehensive data on global emissions, including potential illegal production or use, would be beneficial. Additionally, studies examining the effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol in curbing CFC emissions over time would provide valuable context.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that CFCs are still being used today is partially true. Evidence indicates that certain CFCs have been detected in the atmosphere at increasing levels since the global ban established by the Montreal Protocol. While the production and consumption of many CFCs were officially banned by 2010, ongoing emissions from older equipment and industrial processes suggest that some CFCs may still be released into the environment. However, the exact sources of these emissions remain unclear, with some potentially stemming from illegal production or incomplete chemical reactions.

It is important to note that the current atmospheric concentrations of CFCs are relatively low, yet their impact as potent greenhouse gases cannot be overlooked. The complexity of the data and the potential biases in reporting highlight the need for caution in interpreting these findings.

Readers should be aware that the evidence is not definitive, and there are limitations in the available data regarding the sources and extent of CFC emissions. As such, it is crucial to approach this topic with a critical mindset and to seek out further information to form a well-rounded understanding.

Sources

  1. NOAA Research. "The Montreal Protocol banned this family of ozone-depleting chemicals ...". NOAA
  2. NOAA. "2023 News & Events". NOAA
  3. MIT Climate. "What is the concentration of CFCs in the atmosphere, and ...". MIT Climate
  4. Nature. "Global increase of ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbons from 2010 to ...". Nature
  5. New Scientist. "Ozone-destroying CFC chemicals are on the rise again despite ban". New Scientist
  6. ABC News. "These five ozone-depleting CFCs have been increasing in the atmosphere". ABC News
  7. Phys.org. "Ozone-depleting CFCs hit record despite ban: Study". Phys.org
  8. Fluorocarbons.org. "2023: HFCs contribute 1.3% to climate warming influence of ...". Fluorocarbons
  9. Natural History Museum. "Mystery emissions of ozone-damaging gases are fuelling climate change". Natural History Museum
  10. European Environment Agency. "Ozone-depleting substances - 2024". EEA

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Are cfcs still used?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are cfcs still used?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are cfcs still used?

May 2, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is wxWidgets still used?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is wxWidgets still used?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is wxWidgets still used?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is jQuery still used?
True

Fact Check: Is jQuery still used?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is jQuery still used?

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: House Republicans just shut down half the legislative branch because they’re afraid of the Epstein files.

The Senate still has no clue about a Trump judicial nominee’s involvement in the cover up.

Emil Bove was in senior leadership at DOJ when the files were reviewed.
Partially True

Fact Check: House Republicans just shut down half the legislative branch because they’re afraid of the Epstein files. The Senate still has no clue about a Trump judicial nominee’s involvement in the cover up. Emil Bove was in senior leadership at DOJ when the files were reviewed.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: House Republicans just shut down half the legislative branch because they’re afraid of the Epstein files. The Senate still has no clue about a Trump judicial nominee’s involvement in the cover up. Emil Bove was in senior leadership at DOJ when the files were reviewed.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is handing out cash cards like Halloween candy to illegal immigrants — while 16,000+ wildfire victims who lost their homes and businesses are STILL waiting for help.

🔥 Only 12 rebuilding permits have been issued. TWELVE.
🔥 Entire communities reduced to ashes.
🔥 Taxpaying Americans left in a bureaucratic chokehold.
Partially True

Fact Check: Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is handing out cash cards like Halloween candy to illegal immigrants — while 16,000+ wildfire victims who lost their homes and businesses are STILL waiting for help. 🔥 Only 12 rebuilding permits have been issued. TWELVE. 🔥 Entire communities reduced to ashes. 🔥 Taxpaying Americans left in a bureaucratic chokehold.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is handing out cash cards like Halloween candy to illegal immigrants — while 16,000+ wildfire victims who lost their homes and businesses are STILL waiting for help. 🔥 Only 12 rebuilding permits have been issued. TWELVE. 🔥 Entire communities reduced to ashes. 🔥 Taxpaying Americans left in a bureaucratic chokehold.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are cfcs still used? | TruthOrFake Blog