Fact Check: Applying yoghurt to windows can lower indoor temperatures by up to 3.5°C.

Fact Check: Applying yoghurt to windows can lower indoor temperatures by up to 3.5°C.

Published July 12, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Fact Check: "Applying yoghurt to windows can lower indoor temperatures by up to 3.5°C." ## What We Know The claim that applying yoghurt to windows ...

Fact Check: "Applying yoghurt to windows can lower indoor temperatures by up to 3.5°C."

What We Know

The claim that applying yoghurt to windows can lower indoor temperatures by up to 3.5°C has recently gained attention. A report from Yahoo News indicates that an experiment found that indoor temperatures in a house with yoghurt on the windows were, on average, 0.6°C cooler, with a maximum reduction of 3.5°C during hot and sunny conditions. This effect is attributed to yoghurt's ability to form a thin film on the glass, which reflects some incoming solar radiation due to its light color.

Additionally, a proposal by British engineer Tom Greenhill suggests using yoghurt as a low-cost, low-energy solution to keep homes cool during heatwaves (Dezeen). The theoretical basis for this method is that the yoghurt coating can deflect heat, thereby reducing indoor temperatures.

Analysis

While the initial findings from the Yahoo News report are intriguing, they are based on a single experiment that has not been widely replicated or peer-reviewed. The claim of a maximum temperature reduction of 3.5°C is based on specific conditions—namely, "hot and sunny" weather—which may not be applicable in all situations or climates. Furthermore, the average reduction of 0.6°C suggests that the effectiveness of yoghurt as a window coating may vary significantly depending on external conditions.

The sources supporting this claim, such as the experiment mentioned in the Yahoo article, lack detailed methodological transparency, which raises questions about the reliability of the results. The experiment's design, sample size, and control measures are not discussed, making it difficult to assess the validity of the findings.

In contrast, the Retail Food Inspection Guide for Permanent Food Facilities and other food safety sources do not address the application of yoghurt in this context, focusing instead on food safety and inspection practices. This indicates that while the idea may be novel, it is not grounded in established scientific research or practices.

Conclusion

The claim that applying yoghurt to windows can lower indoor temperatures by up to 3.5°C remains Unverified. Although there is some experimental evidence suggesting a potential cooling effect, the lack of rigorous scientific validation and the variability of results under different conditions make it difficult to accept this claim as fact. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and understand the practical implications of using yoghurt as a window coating.

Sources

  1. Retail Food Inspection Guide for Permanent Food Facilities
  2. FSIS Sampling for Labeling Claims Verification | Food Safety ...
  3. CHAPTER 4 - SAMPLING
  4. I tried putting yoghurt on my windows to see if it really ...
  5. Experiment finds yoghurt can lower house temperature
  6. Yoghurt window coating proposed as emergency ...
  7. Yoghurt Risk Assessment (ISO 22000, 7.3 - 7.4.4)
  8. Descriptive analysis and early-stage consumer acceptance ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh expressed concerns that lower courts may be applying incorrect standards in disability discrimination cases.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh expressed concerns that lower courts may be applying incorrect standards in disability discrimination cases.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh expressed concerns that lower courts may be applying incorrect standards in disability discrimination cases.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Lower court judges are best positioned to understand what is happening on the ground.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Lower court judges are best positioned to understand what is happening on the ground.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Lower court judges are best positioned to understand what is happening on the ground.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump supporters have lower IQs when compared to the rest of the U.S. population.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump supporters have lower IQs when compared to the rest of the U.S. population.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump supporters have lower IQs when compared to the rest of the U.S. population.

Jul 6, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Unverified

Fact Check: During the recent Wisconsin Supreme Court race, Milwaukee election officials allegedly processed ballots in secretive back rooms, blocking observers from watching the action. According to The Federalist, windows were covered, mail bins were stacked to obscure views, and the elections director, Paulina Gutierrez, reportedly kept these areas off-limits, even to folks like state Rep. Dave Maxey, who got a stern talking-to when he tried to peek inside. One room supposedly held stacks of blank ballots, and Gutierrez was seen hauling blue bags around, raising eyebrows about what was really going on. The city claims it’s all legit—sorting ballots by ward and such—but the lack of transparency is maddening. Wisconsin law says observers should have a clear view of the public parts of the process, yet here we are with frosted glass and restricted access. Sources say it’s a “perception issue,” which is putting it mildly. Here is my problem with this; every time democrats, who are in charge of administering elections in blue counties, pull stuff like this it makes every single sane person question the results of the election, and I would like to understand who that benefits? We cannot continue to watch things like this and then see no action afterwards because while I am not saying this would’ve changed the outcome, what I am saying is that this is against WI state law, it’s shady and it makes everyone question the legitimacy of the race.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: During the recent Wisconsin Supreme Court race, Milwaukee election officials allegedly processed ballots in secretive back rooms, blocking observers from watching the action. According to The Federalist, windows were covered, mail bins were stacked to obscure views, and the elections director, Paulina Gutierrez, reportedly kept these areas off-limits, even to folks like state Rep. Dave Maxey, who got a stern talking-to when he tried to peek inside. One room supposedly held stacks of blank ballots, and Gutierrez was seen hauling blue bags around, raising eyebrows about what was really going on. The city claims it’s all legit—sorting ballots by ward and such—but the lack of transparency is maddening. Wisconsin law says observers should have a clear view of the public parts of the process, yet here we are with frosted glass and restricted access. Sources say it’s a “perception issue,” which is putting it mildly. Here is my problem with this; every time democrats, who are in charge of administering elections in blue counties, pull stuff like this it makes every single sane person question the results of the election, and I would like to understand who that benefits? We cannot continue to watch things like this and then see no action afterwards because while I am not saying this would’ve changed the outcome, what I am saying is that this is against WI state law, it’s shady and it makes everyone question the legitimacy of the race.

Apr 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Windows Defender enough?
Mostly False

Fact Check: Is Windows Defender enough?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Windows Defender enough?

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Windows 11 worth it?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is Windows 11 worth it?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Windows 11 worth it?

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Applying yoghurt to windows can lower indoor temperatures by up to 3.5°C. | TruthOrFake Blog