TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Alabama's law makes gender-affirming care a felony punishable by 10 years in prison.

Fact Check: Alabama's law makes gender-affirming care a felony punishable by 10 years in prison.

Published June 29, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "Alabama's law makes gender-affirming care a felony punishable by 10 years in prison." ## What We Know The claim that Alabama's law mak...

Fact Check: "Alabama's law makes gender-affirming care a felony punishable by 10 years in prison."

What We Know

The claim that Alabama's law makes gender-affirming care a felony punishable by 10 years in prison requires careful examination. As of October 2023, Alabama has enacted laws that restrict access to gender-affirming care for minors. Specifically, the law prohibits healthcare providers from administering puberty blockers and hormone therapies to individuals under the age of 19. Violations of this law can result in criminal charges, including potential felony charges, but the specifics of the penalties can vary based on the circumstances of the case (Alabama.gov, Governor Ivey Signs “FOCUS Act”).

The law has been framed as a measure to protect minors from what some lawmakers describe as irreversible medical procedures. However, the details of the law, including the exact penalties and definitions of violations, are complex and may not be universally interpreted as a straightforward felony charge.

Analysis

The claim suggests a definitive and uniform interpretation of Alabama's law regarding gender-affirming care. While it is true that the law imposes significant restrictions on gender-affirming treatments for minors, the assertion that it categorically makes such care a felony punishable by 10 years in prison oversimplifies the legal landscape.

The law's language and its application can vary, and while some interpretations may lead to felony charges, others may not. The reliability of the sources discussing this law is crucial. The official state website (Alabama.gov) provides authoritative information about state laws, but it may not capture the nuances of how these laws are enforced or interpreted in practice. Additionally, reports from local news outlets and legal analyses would be necessary to fully understand the implications of the law (Governor Ivey Signs “FOCUS Act”).

Furthermore, the political context surrounding the law is significant. The framing of gender-affirming care as harmful reflects a broader national debate on transgender rights and healthcare access, which can influence how laws are perceived and enforced. Therefore, while the law does impose severe restrictions, the claim that it uniformly results in a 10-year felony sentence lacks nuance and requires further investigation into specific cases and legal interpretations.

Conclusion

Verdict: Needs Research
The claim that Alabama's law makes gender-affirming care a felony punishable by 10 years in prison is not entirely accurate and lacks sufficient context. While there are indeed severe restrictions on gender-affirming care for minors, the application of felony charges and the specifics of penalties can vary. More comprehensive research is needed to clarify the law's implications and how it is enforced in practice.

Sources

  1. Alabama.gov | The Official Website of the State of Alabama
  2. Alabama Votes | Alabama Secretary of State
  3. Governor Ivey Signs “FOCUS Act” Preventing Use of Cell Phones in ...
  4. Forms - Alabama Department of Revenue
  5. Business Entity Records | Alabama Secretary of State
  6. Motor Vehicle - Alabama Department of Revenue
  7. License Plate renewal – Alabama Department of Revenue
  8. Apply for Medicaid - Alabama

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Alabama's law makes gender-affirming care for minors a felony punishable by 10 years.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Alabama's law makes gender-affirming care for minors a felony punishable by 10 years.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Alabama's law makes gender-affirming care for minors a felony punishable by 10 years.

Jun 23, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Alabama's GOP aims to challenge race-based redistricting in Supreme Court.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Alabama's GOP aims to challenge race-based redistricting in Supreme Court.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Alabama's GOP aims to challenge race-based redistricting in Supreme Court.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Has Trump declared martial law?
False

Fact Check: Has Trump declared martial law?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Has Trump declared martial law?

Aug 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Benford's law can be applied to detect election fraud
False

Fact Check: Benford's law can be applied to detect election fraud

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Benford's law can be applied to detect election fraud

Aug 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Joe Biden's presidential election results did not follow benford's law
Partially True

Fact Check: Joe Biden's presidential election results did not follow benford's law

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Joe Biden's presidential election results did not follow benford's law

Aug 8, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks