Fact Check: Administrative burdens could mummify tens of millions in new red tape.

Fact Check: Administrative burdens could mummify tens of millions in new red tape.

Published June 29, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "Administrative burdens could mummify tens of millions in new red tape." ## What We Know The claim suggests that new administrative bur...

Fact Check: "Administrative burdens could mummify tens of millions in new red tape."

What We Know

The claim suggests that new administrative burdens could significantly hinder productivity and efficiency, potentially affecting millions of people. However, there is no substantial evidence to support this assertion. Administrative burdens can indeed complicate processes, but the extent to which they "mummify" operations is exaggerated.

Studies indicate that while excessive bureaucracy can lead to inefficiencies, the actual impact varies widely depending on the context and the specific regulations involved. For instance, a report by the OECD emphasizes that regulatory burdens can be mitigated through effective management and streamlined processes, rather than leading to a complete standstill in operations.

Analysis

Evaluating the claim requires a closer look at the sources and the context in which administrative burdens are discussed. The term "mummify" implies a complete immobilization, which is not supported by empirical data. The World Bank has conducted extensive research on regulatory frameworks and found that while burdens can slow down processes, they do not universally lead to a total halt in productivity.

Moreover, the reliability of the sources discussing this claim is crucial. Many reports on administrative burdens come from reputable organizations like the OECD and the World Bank, which provide data-driven insights. In contrast, anecdotal evidence or opinions from less credible sources may exaggerate the effects of red tape without providing a balanced view.

For example, while some businesses may experience challenges due to regulatory compliance, others adapt and find ways to navigate these requirements effectively. The Harvard Business Review notes that companies often develop strategies to manage compliance costs, indicating that the impact of administrative burdens is not as dire as the claim suggests.

Conclusion

The claim that "administrative burdens could mummify tens of millions in new red tape" is False. While it is true that administrative burdens can create challenges, the assertion that they would completely immobilize operations is an exaggeration. Evidence from credible sources indicates that organizations can and do adapt to regulatory requirements, often finding ways to mitigate the impact of red tape.

Sources

  1. OECD
  2. World Bank
  3. Harvard Business Review

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Business leaders and ex bank heads throw support behind Poilievre A number of prominent business leaders formally threw their support behind Pierre Poilievre in the upcoming federal election on Saturday, arguing his Conservative Party will best handle Canada’s slowing economic growth. The group of more than 30 current and past executives includes Fairfax Financial CEO Prem Watsa, Canaccord Genuity CEO Dan Daviau, former RBC Capital Markets CEO Anthony Fell and former Scotiabank CEO Brian Porter. They published an open letter in several Canadian newspapers on Saturday saying Poilievre's plans are best to get the country's economy "back on track." "Productivity has stalled. Economic growth has slowed. Our GDP per capita is shrinking," the letter reads. "Nevertheless, this decline is not inevitable -- and it's not the Canada we know and love." To turn things around, the letter said Canada needs to eliminate barriers to productivity by streamlining permit processes and cutting outdated regulations that prevent investment and job creation. It also said the government needs to be more disciplined with its spending, impose lower taxes to make Canada more competitive and develop the country's natural resources by building pipelines, expanding mining and investing in energy. The letter, which was also signed by former RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust founder Edward Sonshine, Mattamy Homes CEO Peter Gilgan and past Toronto Blue Jays president Paul Godfrey, is one of the strongest shows of support Poilievre has seen from the business community yet. His competitor, Liberal Mark Carney, has spent much of the election campaign, which concludes on April 28 when Canadians go to the polls, touting his experience as leader of the central banks in both Canada and England. He argues that experience leaves him best equipped to address the country's economic woes and tariff threats from U.S. President Donald Trump. The Liberals did not immediately respond to request for comment on the letter. The Conservatives, however, took the missive as a sign that their platform is resonating with the business community. “Pierre Poilievre’s Canada First Economic Action Plan is being recognized as a strong plan to lower taxes and eliminate red tape to unleash our industries and bring home powerful paycheques for our people and a thriving economy," Conservative spokesman Sam Lilly said in a statement. Poilievre revealed earlier this week that his plan is designed to cut bureaucratic red tape by 25 per cent in two years through a "two-for-one" law. The law would see two regulations be repealed for every new one that's enacted and require that every dollar spent on new administrative costs trigger the cutting of two dollars in other areas. Meanwhile, Carney has said he will boost interprovincial trade by removing all exemptions under the Canadian Free Trade Agreement, develop a new fund to help link natural resource extraction sites with rail lines and roads and create new programs geared toward training workers. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said it was "no surprise" some business leaders are backing Poilievre and Carney because they're giving a tax break to the ultra-wealthy," rather than focusing on "what people actually need—health care, housing, and support when they lose a job." "Canadians are working hard but falling behind," Singh said in a statement. "Wages aren’t keeping up, housing is out of reach, and public services are stretched. The economy isn’t working for most people." This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 12, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Business leaders and ex bank heads throw support behind Poilievre A number of prominent business leaders formally threw their support behind Pierre Poilievre in the upcoming federal election on Saturday, arguing his Conservative Party will best handle Canada’s slowing economic growth. The group of more than 30 current and past executives includes Fairfax Financial CEO Prem Watsa, Canaccord Genuity CEO Dan Daviau, former RBC Capital Markets CEO Anthony Fell and former Scotiabank CEO Brian Porter. They published an open letter in several Canadian newspapers on Saturday saying Poilievre's plans are best to get the country's economy "back on track." "Productivity has stalled. Economic growth has slowed. Our GDP per capita is shrinking," the letter reads. "Nevertheless, this decline is not inevitable -- and it's not the Canada we know and love." To turn things around, the letter said Canada needs to eliminate barriers to productivity by streamlining permit processes and cutting outdated regulations that prevent investment and job creation. It also said the government needs to be more disciplined with its spending, impose lower taxes to make Canada more competitive and develop the country's natural resources by building pipelines, expanding mining and investing in energy. The letter, which was also signed by former RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust founder Edward Sonshine, Mattamy Homes CEO Peter Gilgan and past Toronto Blue Jays president Paul Godfrey, is one of the strongest shows of support Poilievre has seen from the business community yet. His competitor, Liberal Mark Carney, has spent much of the election campaign, which concludes on April 28 when Canadians go to the polls, touting his experience as leader of the central banks in both Canada and England. He argues that experience leaves him best equipped to address the country's economic woes and tariff threats from U.S. President Donald Trump. The Liberals did not immediately respond to request for comment on the letter. The Conservatives, however, took the missive as a sign that their platform is resonating with the business community. “Pierre Poilievre’s Canada First Economic Action Plan is being recognized as a strong plan to lower taxes and eliminate red tape to unleash our industries and bring home powerful paycheques for our people and a thriving economy," Conservative spokesman Sam Lilly said in a statement. Poilievre revealed earlier this week that his plan is designed to cut bureaucratic red tape by 25 per cent in two years through a "two-for-one" law. The law would see two regulations be repealed for every new one that's enacted and require that every dollar spent on new administrative costs trigger the cutting of two dollars in other areas. Meanwhile, Carney has said he will boost interprovincial trade by removing all exemptions under the Canadian Free Trade Agreement, develop a new fund to help link natural resource extraction sites with rail lines and roads and create new programs geared toward training workers. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said it was "no surprise" some business leaders are backing Poilievre and Carney because they're giving a tax break to the ultra-wealthy," rather than focusing on "what people actually need—health care, housing, and support when they lose a job." "Canadians are working hard but falling behind," Singh said in a statement. "Wages aren’t keeping up, housing is out of reach, and public services are stretched. The economy isn’t working for most people." This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 12, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press

Apr 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Administrative burdens in welfare programs can increase costs and reduce efficiency.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Administrative burdens in welfare programs can increase costs and reduce efficiency.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Administrative burdens in welfare programs can increase costs and reduce efficiency.

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Work requirements for Medicaid can increase administrative burdens.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Work requirements for Medicaid can increase administrative burdens.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Work requirements for Medicaid can increase administrative burdens.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Unverified

Fact Check: Administrative burdens can increase with new requirements in social assistance programs.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Administrative burdens can increase with new requirements in social assistance programs.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Administrative burdens can increase with new work requirements for welfare programs.
Unverified

Fact Check: Administrative burdens can increase with new work requirements for welfare programs.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Administrative burdens can increase with new work requirements for welfare programs.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Administrative burdens can increase with new work requirements for assistance programs.
True

Fact Check: Administrative burdens can increase with new work requirements for assistance programs.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Administrative burdens can increase with new work requirements for assistance programs.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Administrative burdens could mummify tens of millions in new red tape. | TruthOrFake Blog