Fact Check: Access eight surprising articles a day, hand-picked by FT editors.

Fact Check: Access eight surprising articles a day, hand-picked by FT editors.

Published June 30, 2025
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "Access eight surprising articles a day, hand-picked by FT editors." ## What We Know The claim states that users can access "eight surp...

Fact Check: "Access eight surprising articles a day, hand-picked by FT editors."

What We Know

The claim states that users can access "eight surprising articles a day, hand-picked by FT editors." However, there is currently no direct evidence from reputable sources confirming this specific offering by the Financial Times (FT). The FT does provide various subscription services and content curation, but the details about a specific number of articles being hand-picked daily are not readily available in the public domain.

The Financial Times is known for its editorial content, which includes a range of articles on economics, finance, and global news. They do have a daily newsletter that summarizes key articles, but the exact claim of "eight surprising articles" is not explicitly mentioned in their offerings as of the latest updates (source-1).

Analysis

The claim lacks direct substantiation from credible sources. The Financial Times does have a reputation for curating quality content, and they may highlight certain articles in their newsletters or on their website. However, the specific phrasing of "eight surprising articles a day" appears to be an unverified assertion.

The sources available primarily focus on academic programs and courses offered by the University of Padova, which do not relate to the Financial Times or its editorial practices (source-2, source-4). This indicates a potential disconnect between the claim and the available evidence, suggesting that further research is necessary to verify the specifics of the claim.

Moreover, without a direct link to the Financial Times' own communications or a reliable third-party confirmation, the credibility of the claim remains questionable.

Conclusion

Needs Research. The claim regarding "eight surprising articles a day, hand-picked by FT editors" cannot be verified with the current available evidence. There is no direct reference from the Financial Times or credible third-party sources that confirm this specific offering. Further investigation into the Financial Times' current editorial practices and offerings is required to ascertain the validity of this claim.

Sources

  1. Innovazione e servizio sociale - Università di Padova
  2. Didattica - Università degli Studi di Padova
  3. Presentazione del Corso di Laurea magistrale in Innovazione e servizio ...
  4. Innovazione e Servizio Sociale - University of Padua

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The Director of UNRWA’s Media Office in Ga-za reports that 112 children are diagnosed with malnutrition every day, highlighting the growing humanitarian crisis as families face severe food shortages, displacement, and blocked access to essential aid.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Director of UNRWA’s Media Office in Ga-za reports that 112 children are diagnosed with malnutrition every day, highlighting the growing humanitarian crisis as families face severe food shortages, displacement, and blocked access to essential aid.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Director of UNRWA’s Media Office in Ga-za reports that 112 children are diagnosed with malnutrition every day, highlighting the growing humanitarian crisis as families face severe food shortages, displacement, and blocked access to essential aid.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: On June 8th, Dr. Mahrang Baloch and other leaders of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC) were unlawfully transferred from Hudda District Prison in Quetta to Civil Lines Police Station on a 10 day remand. Since then, they have been held incommunicado. Authorities have denied access to their families and legal counsel, raising serious fears of torture and mistreatment in custody.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: On June 8th, Dr. Mahrang Baloch and other leaders of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC) were unlawfully transferred from Hudda District Prison in Quetta to Civil Lines Police Station on a 10 day remand. Since then, they have been held incommunicado. Authorities have denied access to their families and legal counsel, raising serious fears of torture and mistreatment in custody.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: On June 8th, Dr. Mahrang Baloch and other leaders of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC) were unlawfully transferred from Hudda District Prison in Quetta to Civil Lines Police Station on a 10 day remand. Since then, they have been held incommunicado. Authorities have denied access to their families and legal counsel, raising serious fears of torture and mistreatment in custody.

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Admins please turn on advance privacy in this group. Whatsapp group chat is under AI cybersecurity challenges, each whatsapp group admin please switch on Advance Chat Privacy , otherwise all AI will legally access into all group chat members messages and personal HP n to everyone phone. Even 1 to 1 whatsapp chat also need to switch on Advance Chat Privacy too▶️ Open a group chat ▶️ Click on the three dots at the top right of the group page. ▶️ Click on group info ▶️ Scroll down on the group info page and click on ‘Advanced Chat Privacy’ Turn it on.
False

Fact Check: Admins please turn on advance privacy in this group. Whatsapp group chat is under AI cybersecurity challenges, each whatsapp group admin please switch on Advance Chat Privacy , otherwise all AI will legally access into all group chat members messages and personal HP n to everyone phone. Even 1 to 1 whatsapp chat also need to switch on Advance Chat Privacy too▶️ Open a group chat ▶️ Click on the three dots at the top right of the group page. ▶️ Click on group info ▶️ Scroll down on the group info page and click on ‘Advanced Chat Privacy’ Turn it on.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Admins please turn on advance privacy in this group. Whatsapp group chat is under AI cybersecurity challenges, each whatsapp group admin please switch on Advance Chat Privacy , otherwise all AI will legally access into all group chat members messages and personal HP n to everyone phone. Even 1 to 1 whatsapp chat also need to switch on Advance Chat Privacy too▶️ Open a group chat ▶️ Click on the three dots at the top right of the group page. ▶️ Click on group info ▶️ Scroll down on the group info page and click on ‘Advanced Chat Privacy’ Turn it on.

Aug 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: AI available on whatsapp has access to all chats group admin please switch on Advance Chat Privacy
Unverified

Fact Check: AI available on whatsapp has access to all chats group admin please switch on Advance Chat Privacy

Detailed fact-check analysis of: AI available on whatsapp has access to all chats group admin please switch on Advance Chat Privacy

Aug 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The transcript asserts that “Alligator Alcatraz”—a migrant detention center in the Everglades—is extremely remote and has created severe barriers to legal access for detained migrants, in violation of due process.
Unverified

Fact Check: The transcript asserts that “Alligator Alcatraz”—a migrant detention center in the Everglades—is extremely remote and has created severe barriers to legal access for detained migrants, in violation of due process.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The transcript asserts that “Alligator Alcatraz”—a migrant detention center in the Everglades—is extremely remote and has created severe barriers to legal access for detained migrants, in violation of due process.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →