TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Access eight surprising articles a day, hand-picked by FT editors!

Fact Check: Access eight surprising articles a day, hand-picked by FT editors!

Published June 27, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Access eight surprising articles a day, hand-picked by FT editors!" ## What We Know The claim that readers can access "eight surprisin...

Fact Check: "Access eight surprising articles a day, hand-picked by FT editors!"

What We Know

The claim that readers can access "eight surprising articles a day, hand-picked by FT editors" is supported by the launch of the FT Edit app by the Financial Times. According to the Financial Times, the FT Edit app was introduced to provide readers with a curated selection of eight stories every weekday, aimed at surprising and informing a diverse audience. This initiative is part of the FT's strategy to broaden its readership beyond its established subscriber base of over 1.2 million.

The app is designed to offer a mix of in-depth reporting and analysis on various topics, including world news, business, science, and culture. The FT Edit app promises a more digestible reading experience, allowing users to engage with important stories without the overwhelming nature of endless scrolling through news feeds. The introductory pricing for the service is set at £0.99 per month after a free trial period of 30 days (FT Edit).

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim is robust, as it comes directly from the Financial Times, a reputable and established news organization known for its integrity and accuracy in journalism. The FT's announcement about the FT Edit app clearly states that it will feature eight hand-picked articles each weekday, which aligns perfectly with the claim being evaluated.

Additionally, the FT Edit FAQ reiterates that the service curates a selection of the best stories from the Financial Times, emphasizing its goal to provide clarity and insight into current events. The app's design is intended to enhance focus and understanding, catering to readers who may not have the time to consume all available content.

The reliability of the sources is high, given that they originate from the Financial Times itself, which is recognized internationally for its authoritative journalism. There are no indications of bias in the information presented, as the announcement is straightforward and factual, focusing on the features of the new app rather than promoting any particular agenda.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that users can access eight surprising articles a day, hand-picked by FT editors, is accurate. The Financial Times has officially launched the FT Edit app, which is designed to deliver this specific service to its readers. The evidence from the FT's own communications confirms the claim, and the source's credibility further supports its validity.

Sources

  1. FT - About Us - Financial Times
  2. Subscribe to read - Financial Times
  3. FT Edit
  4. What is FT Edit? | Help Centre

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The Director of UNRWA’s Media Office in Ga-za reports that 112 children are diagnosed with malnutrition every day, highlighting the growing humanitarian crisis as families face severe food shortages, displacement, and blocked access to essential aid.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Director of UNRWA’s Media Office in Ga-za reports that 112 children are diagnosed with malnutrition every day, highlighting the growing humanitarian crisis as families face severe food shortages, displacement, and blocked access to essential aid.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Director of UNRWA’s Media Office in Ga-za reports that 112 children are diagnosed with malnutrition every day, highlighting the growing humanitarian crisis as families face severe food shortages, displacement, and blocked access to essential aid.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: On June 8th, Dr. Mahrang Baloch and other leaders of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC) were unlawfully transferred from Hudda District Prison in Quetta to Civil Lines Police Station on a 10 day remand. Since then, they have been held incommunicado. Authorities have denied access to their families and legal counsel, raising serious fears of torture and mistreatment in custody.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: On June 8th, Dr. Mahrang Baloch and other leaders of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC) were unlawfully transferred from Hudda District Prison in Quetta to Civil Lines Police Station on a 10 day remand. Since then, they have been held incommunicado. Authorities have denied access to their families and legal counsel, raising serious fears of torture and mistreatment in custody.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: On June 8th, Dr. Mahrang Baloch and other leaders of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC) were unlawfully transferred from Hudda District Prison in Quetta to Civil Lines Police Station on a 10 day remand. Since then, they have been held incommunicado. Authorities have denied access to their families and legal counsel, raising serious fears of torture and mistreatment in custody.

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Up to 30 percent of listeners would lose access to NPR programming if funding is cut.
True

Fact Check: Up to 30 percent of listeners would lose access to NPR programming if funding is cut.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Up to 30 percent of listeners would lose access to NPR programming if funding is cut.

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Privatizing weather forecasting will limit access to crucial data for low-income individuals.
True

Fact Check: Privatizing weather forecasting will limit access to crucial data for low-income individuals.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Privatizing weather forecasting will limit access to crucial data for low-income individuals.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 140,000 Pennsylvanians would lose access to SNAP under the federal proposal.
True

Fact Check: 140,000 Pennsylvanians would lose access to SNAP under the federal proposal.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 140,000 Pennsylvanians would lose access to SNAP under the federal proposal.

Jul 6, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks