Fact Check: "A recent study found that endorsement of hegemonic masculinity was the strongest predictor of support for Donald Trump in the 2016 and 2020 elections."
What We Know
A comprehensive study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) examined the relationship between the endorsement of hegemonic masculinity (HM) and support for Donald Trump during the 2016 and 2020 elections. The research involved seven studies with a total of 2,007 participants. The findings indicated that both men's and women's endorsement of HM significantly predicted their support for Trump, even when controlling for variables such as political party affiliation, gender, race, and education (source-1, source-6).
The study highlighted that HM was associated with various prejudiced attitudes, including sexism and racism, but it continued to predict support for Trump independently of these factors. This suggests that the cultural ideology surrounding masculinity played a crucial role in legitimizing support for Trump, reinforcing existing gender, race, and class hierarchies (source-2, source-4).
Analysis
The evidence presented in the study is robust, as it is based on a large sample size and multiple studies that consistently support the same conclusion. The authors, Theresa K. Vescio and Nathaniel E.C. Schermerhorn, are affiliated with reputable academic institutions, which adds credibility to their research (source-1, source-6).
Critically, the study's methodology involved controlling for various confounding factors, which strengthens the argument that HM is a unique predictor of support for Trump. The findings challenge the notion that support for Trump can be solely attributed to traditional political affiliations or demographic characteristics, instead emphasizing the psychological and cultural dimensions of masculinity (source-2, source-4).
However, it is important to note that while the study presents strong correlations, it does not establish causation. The relationship between HM and support for Trump could be influenced by other underlying factors not fully explored in the research. Nonetheless, the consistency of the findings across multiple studies provides a compelling argument for the claim.
Conclusion
The claim that "a recent study found that endorsement of hegemonic masculinity was the strongest predictor of support for Donald Trump in the 2016 and 2020 elections" is True. The evidence from the study demonstrates a significant correlation between HM and support for Trump, independent of other factors. This highlights the importance of cultural ideologies in shaping political attitudes and behaviors.
Sources
- Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 voting and ... - PubMed. Link
- Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 voting and candidate ... - PNAS. Link
- Men's and women's endorsement of hegemonic masculinity and responses to COVID-19. Link
- Traditional stereotypes about masculinity may help explain support for ... - Penn State News. Link
- Trump Offered Men Something That Democrats Never Could - The New York Times. Link
- Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 voting and ... - PNAS. Link
- (PDF) Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 ... - ResearchGate. Link
- Hegemonic Masculinity Predicts Support for U.S. Political ... Link
