Fact Check: A peer-reviewed article published in 2017 in the medical journal BMJ Open found that rubber and plastic bullets caused significant injury and mortality, concluding they are not appropriate for use in crowd-control settings.

Fact Check: A peer-reviewed article published in 2017 in the medical journal BMJ Open found that rubber and plastic bullets caused significant injury and mortality, concluding they are not appropriate for use in crowd-control settings.

Published June 17, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "A peer-reviewed article published in 2017 in the medical journal BMJ Open found that rubber and plastic bullets caused significant inju...

Fact Check: "A peer-reviewed article published in 2017 in the medical journal BMJ Open found that rubber and plastic bullets caused significant injury and mortality, concluding they are not appropriate for use in crowd-control settings."

What We Know

A systematic review conducted by Rohini J. Haar and colleagues, published in the medical journal BMJ Open in 2017, examined the impact of kinetic impact projectiles (KIPs), which include rubber and plastic bullets, on human health. The review analyzed data from 26 studies involving 1984 individuals, revealing that 53 people died as a result of injuries from these projectiles, and 300 suffered permanent disabilities. The authors noted that a significant proportion of deaths and disabilities resulted from strikes to the head and neck, emphasizing that KIPs are commonly used in crowd-control situations and have led to considerable morbidity and mortality over the years. The study concluded that due to their potential for severe injury and misuse, KIPs are not appropriate for crowd-control settings (Haar et al., 2017).

Analysis

The claim that a peer-reviewed article published in 2017 in BMJ Open found that rubber and plastic bullets cause significant injury and mortality, and that they are not suitable for crowd-control use, is supported by the findings of the systematic review. The review's methodology involved a comprehensive analysis of existing literature, which adds credibility to its conclusions. The authors are affiliated with reputable institutions, including the University of California and Physicians for Human Rights, which enhances the reliability of the study (Haar et al., 2017).

Furthermore, a recent article from NPR highlights the ongoing concerns regarding the use of rubber bullets in crowd control, reiterating that while these munitions are labeled "less lethal," they can still cause serious harm. This aligns with the findings of the 2017 study, reinforcing the argument against their use in crowd-control situations (NPR, 2025).

The systematic review's findings are corroborated by other sources, such as a report from the National Center for Biotechnology Information, which discusses the devastating injuries caused by rubber bullets and beanbag rounds during protests (NCBI, 2023). This consistency across multiple reputable sources strengthens the validity of the original claim.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim is accurate as it is substantiated by a peer-reviewed article published in 2017 in BMJ Open, which found that rubber and plastic bullets have caused significant injuries and fatalities, concluding that they are not appropriate for use in crowd-control settings. The evidence from multiple credible sources supports this conclusion, highlighting the serious risks associated with these types of munitions.

Sources

  1. Rubber Bullets and Beanbag Rounds Can Cause Devastating Injuries
  2. L.A. sued over attacks on journalists at immigration protests
  3. Death, injury and disability from kinetic impact projectiles in crowd-control settings: A systematic review

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: A peer-reviewed article published in 2017 in the medical journal BMJ Open found that rubber and plastic bullets can cause significant injury and are not appropriate for use in crowd-control settings.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A peer-reviewed article published in 2017 in the medical journal BMJ Open found that rubber and plastic bullets can cause significant injury and are not appropriate for use in crowd-control settings.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A peer-reviewed article published in 2017 in the medical journal BMJ Open found that rubber and plastic bullets can cause significant injury and are not appropriate for use in crowd-control settings.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A peer-reviewed article published in 2017 in the medical journal BMJ Open found that rubber and plastic bullets cause significant injury and are not appropriate for use in crowd-control settings.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A peer-reviewed article published in 2017 in the medical journal BMJ Open found that rubber and plastic bullets cause significant injury and are not appropriate for use in crowd-control settings.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A peer-reviewed article published in 2017 in the medical journal BMJ Open found that rubber and plastic bullets cause significant injury and are not appropriate for use in crowd-control settings.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: NATO may invoke Article 5 due to significant cyberattacks.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: NATO may invoke Article 5 due to significant cyberattacks.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: NATO may invoke Article 5 due to significant cyberattacks.

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Kenyan protesters clashed with club-carrying young men, believed to be loyal to the government, in Nairobi on [specific date not provided in the article].
True

Fact Check: Kenyan protesters clashed with club-carrying young men, believed to be loyal to the government, in Nairobi on [specific date not provided in the article].

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Kenyan protesters clashed with club-carrying young men, believed to be loyal to the government, in Nairobi on [specific date not provided in the article].

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Article 7 allows EU to penalize member states violating fundamental rights.
True

Fact Check: Article 7 allows EU to penalize member states violating fundamental rights.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Article 7 allows EU to penalize member states violating fundamental rights.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →