Fact Check: A legal group called Abogados Solidarios filed an electoral protection action before the Electoral Court in La Plata on June 13, 2023, to allow Cristina Fernández de Kirchner to stand as a candidate in the September elections.

Fact Check: A legal group called Abogados Solidarios filed an electoral protection action before the Electoral Court in La Plata on June 13, 2023, to allow Cristina Fernández de Kirchner to stand as a candidate in the September elections.

June 15, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "A legal group called Abogados Solidarios filed an electoral protection action before the Electoral Court in La Plata on June 13, 2023, ...

Fact Check: "A legal group called Abogados Solidarios filed an electoral protection action before the Electoral Court in La Plata on June 13, 2023, to allow Cristina Fernández de Kirchner to stand as a candidate in the September elections."

What We Know

On June 10, 2025, Argentina's Supreme Court upheld the conviction of former President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, effectively barring her from holding public office due to a six-year prison sentence related to corruption charges in the "Causa Vialidad" case (source-1). Following this ruling, on June 12, a legal action was filed by the group "Abogados Solidarios" in the Electoral Court of La Plata. This action aimed to challenge the disqualification of Fernández de Kirchner and sought to ensure her eligibility to run for a legislative seat in the upcoming elections (source-2, source-8).

The legal filing was made just one day after the Supreme Court's decision, which had significant implications for Kirchner's political future. The amparo was intended to protect her right to run as a candidate in the elections scheduled for September 2025 (source-2).

Analysis

The claim that "Abogados Solidarios filed an electoral protection action" is accurate, as confirmed by multiple sources. The group did file an amparo on June 12, 2025, to contest the Supreme Court's ruling that disqualified Fernández de Kirchner from running for office (source-2, source-8). However, the context surrounding this action is critical. The Supreme Court's ruling, which upheld her conviction, was described as a definitive end to her electoral ambitions, indicating that the legal action was more of a symbolic gesture in light of the overwhelming legal obstacles she faced (source-1, source-3).

The credibility of the sources reporting on this issue is generally high, with established news organizations providing coverage. However, the political context surrounding Fernández de Kirchner's conviction and the subsequent legal actions may introduce biases, particularly from outlets aligned with different political factions in Argentina (source-5).

Conclusion

The claim that "Abogados Solidarios filed an electoral protection action before the Electoral Court in La Plata on June 13, 2023, to allow Cristina Fernández de Kirchner to stand as a candidate in the September elections" is Partially True. While the filing did occur, it was made in the context of a Supreme Court ruling that effectively barred Fernández de Kirchner from running for office, making the action largely symbolic and unlikely to succeed. Thus, while the legal action was indeed filed, its potential impact is severely limited by the prevailing legal circumstances.

Sources

  1. Argentina's Supreme Court upholds conviction on former president Cristina Kirchner, ends her electoral run. Latin America Reports
  2. Ramos Padilla Rejected the Amparo to Maintain the Candidacy of CFK. Ground News
  3. Fernández de Kirchner's ban from office marks new chapter. Buenos Aires Times
  4. Cristina Fernández de Kirchner's corruption conviction shatters Argentine politics. El País
  5. We oppose the Supreme Court ruling that imposes a regime of political proscription. Prensa Obrera
  6. What is a Supreme Court for? Buenos Aires Times
  7. Argentina's Top Court Bans Kirchner From Office for Life. Bloomberg
  8. Presentan un amparo en La Plata para que Cristina Kirchner pueda ser candidata en las próximas elecciones. La Plata 1

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court's decision and that Trump's legal efforts have failed.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court's decision and that Trump's legal efforts have failed.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court's decision and that Trump's legal efforts have failed.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Department of Homeland Security confirmed that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers will be present at the Club World Cup fixtures, stating that 'All non-American citizens need to carry proof of their legal status.'
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Department of Homeland Security confirmed that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers will be present at the Club World Cup fixtures, stating that 'All non-American citizens need to carry proof of their legal status.'

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Department of Homeland Security confirmed that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers will be present at the Club World Cup fixtures, stating that 'All non-American citizens need to carry proof of their legal status.'

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: California's Governor Gavin Newsom secured $25 million to fund legal fights against the Trump administration in 2023.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: California's Governor Gavin Newsom secured $25 million to fund legal fights against the Trump administration in 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: California's Governor Gavin Newsom secured $25 million to fund legal fights against the Trump administration in 2023.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: California's current attorney general, Rob Bonta, stated on June 14, 2025, that he was on pace to bring twice as many legal actions against the Trump administration as during the first Trump administration.
False

Fact Check: California's current attorney general, Rob Bonta, stated on June 14, 2025, that he was on pace to bring twice as many legal actions against the Trump administration as during the first Trump administration.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: California's current attorney general, Rob Bonta, stated on June 14, 2025, that he was on pace to bring twice as many legal actions against the Trump administration as during the first Trump administration.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Federal Supreme Court indicated that Ukrainian authorities are not in a position to fulfill the requirements for mutual legal assistance proceedings in criminal matters.
Needs Research

Fact Check: The Federal Supreme Court indicated that Ukrainian authorities are not in a position to fulfill the requirements for mutual legal assistance proceedings in criminal matters.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Federal Supreme Court indicated that Ukrainian authorities are not in a position to fulfill the requirements for mutual legal assistance proceedings in criminal matters.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court indicated that Ukrainian authorities are not in a position to fulfill the requirements for mutual legal assistance proceedings in criminal matters.
True

Fact Check: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court indicated that Ukrainian authorities are not in a position to fulfill the requirements for mutual legal assistance proceedings in criminal matters.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court indicated that Ukrainian authorities are not in a position to fulfill the requirements for mutual legal assistance proceedings in criminal matters.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →