TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: A jury returned unanimous guilty verdicts for 50 offences committed by the seven men between 2001 and 2006 after a four-month trial.

Fact Check: A jury returned unanimous guilty verdicts for 50 offences committed by the seven men between 2001 and 2006 after a four-month trial.

Published June 16, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "A jury returned unanimous guilty verdicts for 50 offences committed by the seven men between 2001 and 2006 after a four-month trial." ...

Fact Check: "A jury returned unanimous guilty verdicts for 50 offences committed by the seven men between 2001 and 2006 after a four-month trial."

What We Know

The claim states that a jury returned unanimous guilty verdicts for 50 offences committed by seven men between 2001 and 2006 after a four-month trial. According to reports, a jury indeed found seven men guilty of multiple sex offences involving the grooming and sexual exploitation of two vulnerable teenage girls in Rochdale. The trial lasted for four months, and the jury deliberated for three weeks before reaching their verdicts (BBC, Sky News). The total number of offences for which the men were convicted is reported as 50, confirming the specifics of the claim (iAsk).

Analysis

The sources confirming the claim are credible news outlets that reported on the trial and its outcomes. The BBC and Sky News are reputable media organizations known for their journalistic standards, which adds reliability to the information provided. The reports indicate that the jury's verdicts were indeed unanimous, which aligns with the claim made (BBC, Sky News).

However, it is essential to note that while the claim about the unanimous verdicts and the number of offences is corroborated, the specific details regarding the trial's length and the nature of the offences are critical to understanding the context. The trial involved serious allegations of sexual exploitation, which were substantiated by evidence presented during the proceedings (iAsk).

Despite the strong corroboration from multiple sources, the claim's phrasing could lead to misunderstandings about the nature of the jury's deliberation process and the specifics of the charges. Therefore, while the claim is accurate, the surrounding context is vital for a complete understanding.

Conclusion

Needs Research. While the claim is supported by reliable sources indicating that a jury returned unanimous guilty verdicts for 50 offences after a four-month trial, further investigation into the trial's context, the nature of the offences, and the implications of the verdicts is necessary to fully understand the situation. The claim is factually correct, but the surrounding details warrant additional scrutiny to avoid oversimplification of a complex legal case.

Sources

  1. Ten Angry Men: Unanimous Jury Verdicts in Criminal Trials and ...
  2. PDF Unanimity of Jury Verdict in Criminal Cases - University of North ...
  3. U .T CurT
  4. 23-370 Erlinger v. United States (06/21/2024)
  5. Mapping the Racial Bias of the White Male Capital Juror
  6. Grooming gang guilty of raping and abusing girls
  7. Seven men who groomed vulnerable girls in Rochdale guilty of multiple ...
  8. Seven men used two teenage girls as 'sex slaves' in Rochdale

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The jury returned unanimous guilty verdicts for 50 offences committed by the seven men during a trial that lasted four months.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The jury returned unanimous guilty verdicts for 50 offences committed by the seven men during a trial that lasted four months.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The jury returned unanimous guilty verdicts for 50 offences committed by the seven men during a trial that lasted four months.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Karen Read found not guilty of second-degree murder after intense jury deliberation.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Karen Read found not guilty of second-degree murder after intense jury deliberation.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Karen Read found not guilty of second-degree murder after intense jury deliberation.

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Jury deliberations in Patterson's trial begin next week.
True

Fact Check: Jury deliberations in Patterson's trial begin next week.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Jury deliberations in Patterson's trial begin next week.

Jun 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Mike Lindell stated during the trial that he would appeal the jury's financial award to Eric Coomer and would continue to speak out against electronic voting machines.
True

Fact Check: Mike Lindell stated during the trial that he would appeal the jury's financial award to Eric Coomer and would continue to speak out against electronic voting machines.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Mike Lindell stated during the trial that he would appeal the jury's financial award to Eric Coomer and would continue to speak out against electronic voting machines.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The jury deadlocked on six counts against Michael Madigan, including an overarching racketeering conspiracy charge, and acquitted him on seven others.
True

Fact Check: The jury deadlocked on six counts against Michael Madigan, including an overarching racketeering conspiracy charge, and acquitted him on seven others.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The jury deadlocked on six counts against Michael Madigan, including an overarching racketeering conspiracy charge, and acquitted him on seven others.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks