Fact Check: A general strike changing things is as much of a fantasy as mass protest.

Fact Check: "A general strike changing things is as much of a fantasy as mass protest."

What We Know

The claim suggests that both general strikes and mass protests are ineffective in creating substantial change. However, research indicates otherwise. According to a study led by Erica Chenoweth, nonviolent civil resistance, which includes general strikes, is significantly more successful in achieving political and social change than violent campaigns. Chenoweth's research analyzed data from 1900 to 2006 and found that countries with nonviolent campaigns were about ten times more likely to transition to democracies within five years compared to those with violent campaigns (Harvard Gazette).

General strikes are defined as collective actions where participants cease all economic activity to strengthen their bargaining position or achieve social and political goals (Wikipedia). Historical examples, such as the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa, demonstrate the effectiveness of general strikes in mobilizing large numbers of people and disrupting the status quo, leading to significant political changes (Harvard Gazette).

Analysis

The assertion that general strikes are as much of a fantasy as mass protests lacks substantial backing when evaluated against historical and empirical evidence. Nonviolent resistance, which encompasses general strikes, has been shown to mobilize diverse groups and create shifts in loyalty among key societal actors, such as security forces and political elites (Harvard Gazette).

Moreover, the effectiveness of general strikes is supported by their historical context. For instance, the general strike during the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa was crucial in applying economic pressure on the ruling government, ultimately leading to negotiations for democratic reforms (Harvard Gazette). This suggests that general strikes can indeed lead to meaningful change when organized effectively.

While the claim may stem from a perception of futility in large-scale protests or strikes, the evidence indicates that both strategies can be powerful tools for social change, particularly when they are well-organized and supported by a significant portion of the population (Waging Nonviolence).

Conclusion

Verdict: False
The claim that a general strike changing things is as much of a fantasy as mass protest is false. Evidence shows that both general strikes and mass protests can be effective means of enacting social and political change, particularly when they are part of a well-coordinated nonviolent resistance strategy. Historical examples and research findings support the notion that these forms of collective action can lead to significant transformations in society.

Sources

1. Nonviolent resistance proves potent weapon
2. General strike
3. General strike - Museum of Protest
4. What would a general strike in the US actually look like?
5. Reviving the General Strike
6. Understanding General Strikes: Definition, Examples, and ...
7. General Strike - an overview
8. A General Strike? Why This is a HUGE Organizational ...