Fact Check: A federal appeals court on Friday declined to rehear President Trump's challenge to a $5 million civil judgment.

Fact Check: A federal appeals court on Friday declined to rehear President Trump's challenge to a $5 million civil judgment.

June 13, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "A federal appeals court on Friday declined to rehear President Trump's challenge to a $5 million civil judgment." ## What We Know On J...

Fact Check: "A federal appeals court on Friday declined to rehear President Trump's challenge to a $5 million civil judgment."

What We Know

On June 13, 2025, a federal appeals court declined to rehear President Donald Trump's challenge regarding a $5 million civil judgment awarded to E. Jean Carroll. This judgment stemmed from a jury's finding that Trump had sexually abused and defamed Carroll, a claim that has been the subject of extensive legal proceedings since Carroll first accused Trump in 2019 (E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump). The case, known as Carroll II, concluded with a jury verdict in May 2023, which ordered Trump to pay damages for his actions (source-3).

The appeals court's decision not to rehear the case means that the original ruling stands, and enforcement of the judgment is expected to begin shortly (source-5). This judgment is part of a broader legal context, as Trump is also appealing an additional $83.3 million judgment related to another defamation case against Carroll (source-1).

Analysis

The claim that a federal appeals court has declined to rehear Trump's challenge to the $5 million judgment is accurate based on multiple sources. The ruling was made by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which did not grant Trump's request for a rehearing, a decision that was notably criticized by two judges appointed by Trump himself (source-6).

The reliability of the sources reporting on this event is generally high. Major news outlets such as CNBC and PBS have covered the story, providing detailed accounts of the court's decision and its implications (source-3, source-8). However, it is essential to note that the context of Trump's legal battles is complex, with multiple lawsuits and appeals ongoing, which may lead to varying interpretations of the significance of this particular ruling.

Conclusion

Needs Research. While the claim regarding the appeals court's decision is factually correct, the broader implications of this ruling and its context within Trump's ongoing legal challenges require further investigation. The situation is fluid, with multiple cases and appeals in play, and the potential for new developments that could affect the outcomes of these legal battles.

Sources

  1. E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump
  2. New York business fraud lawsuit against the Trump ...
  3. Trump loses bid to rehear E. Jean Carroll case appeal
  4. Full 2nd Circuit Won't Review $5M Judgment Against ...
  5. Trump's Final Appeal Denied in E. Jean Carroll Civil Rape ...
  6. Trump-appointed judges dissent in E. Jean Carroll case
  7. Mediagazer
  8. $5 million verdict in sexual abuse case against President- ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: A federal appeals court declined to rehear President Donald Trump's challenge to a $5 million civil judgment on October 27, 2023.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A federal appeals court declined to rehear President Donald Trump's challenge to a $5 million civil judgment on October 27, 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A federal appeals court declined to rehear President Donald Trump's challenge to a $5 million civil judgment on October 27, 2023.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California on June 11, 2025.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California on June 11, 2025.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California on June 11, 2025.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A jury in Manhattan federal court found in 2023 that Trump attacked Carroll in the dressing room of a Bergdorf Goodman department store in the 1990s.
Needs Research

Fact Check: A jury in Manhattan federal court found in 2023 that Trump attacked Carroll in the dressing room of a Bergdorf Goodman department store in the 1990s.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A jury in Manhattan federal court found in 2023 that Trump attacked Carroll in the dressing room of a Bergdorf Goodman department store in the 1990s.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court rejected three appeals to release funds linked to former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych on July 27, 2024.
True

Fact Check: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court rejected three appeals to release funds linked to former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych on July 27, 2024.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court rejected three appeals to release funds linked to former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych on July 27, 2024.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In 2023, a jury in Manhattan federal court found Donald Trump liable for battery and defamation against E. Jean Carroll, stemming from an incident in the 1990s.
Partially True

Fact Check: In 2023, a jury in Manhattan federal court found Donald Trump liable for battery and defamation against E. Jean Carroll, stemming from an incident in the 1990s.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In 2023, a jury in Manhattan federal court found Donald Trump liable for battery and defamation against E. Jean Carroll, stemming from an incident in the 1990s.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A federal appeals court on Friday declined to rehear President Trump's challenge to a $5 million civil judgment. | TruthOrFake Blog