Fact Check: 6-3 Supreme Court ruling reverses appeals court decision on phone fee's constitutionality

Fact Check: "6-3 Supreme Court ruling reverses appeals court decision on phone fee's constitutionality"

What We Know

On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision regarding the constitutionality of a fee that subsidizes phone and internet services for schools, libraries, and rural areas. This ruling reversed a previous decision by an appeals court that had deemed the Universal Service Fund fee unconstitutional. The Supreme Court's decision allows the fee to continue, which has been part of the telecommunications landscape for nearly 30 years (source-1, source-6, source-8).

Analysis

The claim that the Supreme Court's ruling was a 6-3 decision reversing an appeals court ruling is accurate. The sources confirm that the justices voted 6-3 to uphold the constitutionality of the Universal Service Fund fee, which had been challenged in lower courts. The appeals court had previously ruled against the fee, citing constitutional concerns, but the Supreme Court's ruling effectively reinstates the fee (source-1, source-6, source-8).

The reliability of the sources is generally strong, as they include official court documents and reputable news outlets. However, the specific details of the appeals court's reasoning and the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling would require further examination to fully understand the legal context and ramifications of this decision.

Conclusion

Needs Research. While the claim regarding the Supreme Court's ruling is accurate, further investigation is necessary to explore the implications of the decision, the details surrounding the appeals court's ruling, and the broader context of the Universal Service Fund. This additional research would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the constitutional arguments involved and the potential impact on telecommunications policy.

Sources

1. 24A884 Trump v. CASA, Inc. (06/27/2025)
2. Home - Supreme Court of the United States
3. Facts and Case Summary - New Jersey v. T.L.O.
4. Supreme Court of the United States
5. google mail
6. Supreme Court OKs fee that subsidizes phone, internet ...
7. Accedi - Account Google
8. Supreme Court OKs Fee That Subsidizes Phone, Internet ...