TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: 5th Circuit Court dismissed Landor's case despite acknowledging his mistreatment.

Fact Check: 5th Circuit Court dismissed Landor's case despite acknowledging his mistreatment.

Published June 24, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "5th Circuit Court dismissed Landor's case despite acknowledging his mistreatment." ## What We Know Damon Landor, a Rastafarian inmate,...

Fact Check: "5th Circuit Court dismissed Landor's case despite acknowledging his mistreatment."

What We Know

Damon Landor, a Rastafarian inmate, filed a lawsuit against the Louisiana Department of Corrections after prison officials forcibly cut his hair, which he claimed violated his religious beliefs. The district court initially dismissed his claims, stating that the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) does not allow for damages against individual state officials (source-2). On September 14, 2023, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal, affirming that Landor was not entitled to monetary relief (source-1).

Despite the dismissal, the Fifth Circuit acknowledged the severity of Landor's mistreatment, as indicated by the dissenting opinion from six judges who argued that RLUIPA does provide a cause of action for monetary damages (source-2). This dissent highlighted the importance of monetary damages in cases where prisons might otherwise moot claims through the release or transfer of inmates.

Analysis

The claim that the Fifth Circuit dismissed Landor's case while acknowledging his mistreatment is partially true. The court did dismiss the case, but it also recognized the mistreatment through the dissenting opinions, which emphasized the need for accountability and the potential for damages under RLUIPA. The dissenting judges pointed out that the lack of monetary damages could lead to a lack of accountability for prison officials, which is a significant concern in cases involving religious rights (source-2, source-3).

The reliability of the sources is strong, as they include official court documents and legal analyses from recognized legal institutions. However, the dissenting opinions may reflect a more sympathetic view towards Landor's situation, which could introduce a degree of bias in interpreting the court's overall stance on the case. The dissenters' acknowledgment of mistreatment does not equate to a formal recognition by the majority ruling, which strictly adhered to the legal interpretation of RLUIPA regarding damages.

Conclusion

The verdict is Partially True. While the Fifth Circuit did dismiss Landor's case, it also acknowledged the mistreatment he experienced through dissenting opinions that argued for the necessity of damages in such cases. This duality reflects the complexity of legal interpretations surrounding religious rights and the accountability of state officials.

Sources

  1. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  2. Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety (U.S.)
  3. Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety (U.S.) - Court Opinion
  4. Opinion Search - United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  5. PDF No. 23-1197 In the Supreme Court of the United States
  6. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
  7. SCS Login - reservecloud.com
  8. RLUIPA and Individual Liability: Insights from Landor v ... - CaseMine

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: 5th Circuit Court dismissed inmate's case despite acknowledging his mistreatment.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: 5th Circuit Court dismissed inmate's case despite acknowledging his mistreatment.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 5th Circuit Court dismissed inmate's case despite acknowledging his mistreatment.

Jun 23, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 5th Circuit Court ruled 9-7 that phone fee funding method is unconstitutional
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: 5th Circuit Court ruled 9-7 that phone fee funding method is unconstitutional

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 5th Circuit Court ruled 9-7 that phone fee funding method is unconstitutional

Jun 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Ninth Circuit Court grants Trump unprecedented authority over National Guard deployment.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Ninth Circuit Court grants Trump unprecedented authority over National Guard deployment.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Ninth Circuit Court grants Trump unprecedented authority over National Guard deployment.

Jun 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Sixth Circuit Court previously rejected the suit against spending limits.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Sixth Circuit Court previously rejected the suit against spending limits.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Sixth Circuit Court previously rejected the suit against spending limits.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Louisiana's Ten Commandments law blocked as unconstitutional by Fifth Circuit Court.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Louisiana's Ten Commandments law blocked as unconstitutional by Fifth Circuit Court.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Louisiana's Ten Commandments law blocked as unconstitutional by Fifth Circuit Court.

Jun 24, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: 5th Circuit Court dismissed Landor's case despite acknowledging his mistreatment. | TruthOrFake Blog