Fact Check: "28 states chose to sit out the fight against Trump's birthright citizenship order."
What We Know
The claim that "28 states chose to sit out the fight against Trump's birthright citizenship order" is supported by recent developments in the legal landscape surrounding President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship. According to a New York Times article, the Supreme Court's decision on June 27, 2025, effectively allows the executive order to go into effect in these 28 states that did not challenge it. This ruling indicates that these states have opted not to engage in legal battles against the order, thereby confirming the claim.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court's ruling was significant as it limited the ability of lower courts to issue nationwide injunctions against executive actions, which has been a common legal strategy used to block such policies. The Washington Post notes that this decision could lead to a patchwork of citizenship rules across the country, as the executive order may only be enforced in states that did not file challenges.
Analysis
The evidence supporting the claim comes from multiple reputable sources, including major news outlets like the New York Times and NPR. These sources report that the Supreme Court's ruling allows Trump's birthright citizenship order to take effect in the 28 states that did not contest it. This information is corroborated by legal experts and the context provided by the court's decision, which indicates a significant shift in how executive orders can be challenged.
However, it is important to consider the potential biases of these sources. The New York Times and NPR are generally regarded as credible news organizations, but they may have editorial slants that could influence how they report on politically charged issues. Nonetheless, the consistency of the information across multiple outlets lends credibility to the claim.
Additionally, the legal implications of the ruling are profound, as highlighted by Reuters, which discusses how the decision could redefine citizenship in the U.S. The ruling is expected to lead to various legal challenges and class-action lawsuits in the future, indicating that while 28 states may not have challenged the order initially, the situation could evolve.
Conclusion
The claim that "28 states chose to sit out the fight against Trump's birthright citizenship order" is True. The evidence from multiple credible sources confirms that these states did not challenge the executive order, allowing it to potentially take effect as ruled by the Supreme Court. The implications of this decision could lead to significant changes in citizenship laws across the United States.
Sources
- 24A884 Trump v. CASA, Inc. (06/27/2025)
- Supreme Court Limits Judges' Ability to Issue Nationwide Injunctions, a ...
- Supreme Court limits nationwide injunctions in birthright case
- Supreme Court in birthright case limits judges' power to ...
- Supreme Court limits nationwide orders that have blocked ...
- In Birthright Citizenship Case, Supreme Court Limits Power of Judges to ...
- What the Supreme Court's Ruling Will Mean for Birthright ...
