TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: 28 states chose to sit out the fight against Trump's birthright citizenship order.

Fact Check: 28 states chose to sit out the fight against Trump's birthright citizenship order.

Published June 28, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "28 states chose to sit out the fight against Trump's birthright citizenship order." ## What We Know The claim that "28 states chose to...

Fact Check: "28 states chose to sit out the fight against Trump's birthright citizenship order."

What We Know

The claim that "28 states chose to sit out the fight against Trump's birthright citizenship order" is supported by recent developments in the legal landscape surrounding President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship. According to a New York Times article, the Supreme Court's decision on June 27, 2025, effectively allows the executive order to go into effect in these 28 states that did not challenge it. This ruling indicates that these states have opted not to engage in legal battles against the order, thereby confirming the claim.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court's ruling was significant as it limited the ability of lower courts to issue nationwide injunctions against executive actions, which has been a common legal strategy used to block such policies. The Washington Post notes that this decision could lead to a patchwork of citizenship rules across the country, as the executive order may only be enforced in states that did not file challenges.

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim comes from multiple reputable sources, including major news outlets like the New York Times and NPR. These sources report that the Supreme Court's ruling allows Trump's birthright citizenship order to take effect in the 28 states that did not contest it. This information is corroborated by legal experts and the context provided by the court's decision, which indicates a significant shift in how executive orders can be challenged.

However, it is important to consider the potential biases of these sources. The New York Times and NPR are generally regarded as credible news organizations, but they may have editorial slants that could influence how they report on politically charged issues. Nonetheless, the consistency of the information across multiple outlets lends credibility to the claim.

Additionally, the legal implications of the ruling are profound, as highlighted by Reuters, which discusses how the decision could redefine citizenship in the U.S. The ruling is expected to lead to various legal challenges and class-action lawsuits in the future, indicating that while 28 states may not have challenged the order initially, the situation could evolve.

Conclusion

The claim that "28 states chose to sit out the fight against Trump's birthright citizenship order" is True. The evidence from multiple credible sources confirms that these states did not challenge the executive order, allowing it to potentially take effect as ruled by the Supreme Court. The implications of this decision could lead to significant changes in citizenship laws across the United States.

Sources

  1. 24A884 Trump v. CASA, Inc. (06/27/2025)
  2. Supreme Court Limits Judges' Ability to Issue Nationwide Injunctions, a ...
  3. Supreme Court limits nationwide injunctions in birthright case
  4. Supreme Court in birthright case limits judges' power to ...
  5. Supreme Court limits nationwide orders that have blocked ...
  6. In Birthright Citizenship Case, Supreme Court Limits Power of Judges to ...
  7. What the Supreme Court's Ruling Will Mean for Birthright ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: During the 2020 presidential election, when Joe Biden became the president in the United States, during counting Donald Trump's auditors were not let into the respective buildings in some states, where counting was carried out
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: During the 2020 presidential election, when Joe Biden became the president in the United States, during counting Donald Trump's auditors were not let into the respective buildings in some states, where counting was carried out

Detailed fact-check analysis of: During the 2020 presidential election, when Joe Biden became the president in the United States, during counting Donald Trump's auditors were not let into the respective buildings in some states, where counting was carried out

Aug 8, 2025
Read more →
🔍
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I'm Christy Nome here in Texas with my boots on the ground after this devastating tragedy that was absolutely not preventable and we are in no way responsible for it after visiting here I recently found out that Habius Corpus is the name of a city here in Texas and is in fact not a legal term which means the president can do whatever he wants. I have been told by some people that in addition to being the Secretary of Homeland Security that does also make me the head of Fema Fema sounds like female or feminism and that's DEI and 00:34 I don't believe in that. President Trump has entrusted me to be in charge of Fema which is not a federal emergency management agency. In fact, all emergencies are actually being managed by the state and the reason why I am here is to make sure to get some good film for my B roll. It is completely disgusting that there are people out there who are trying to politicize the devastation that happened here in Texas and I would like to remind everyone that it is only okay to politicize natural disasters when they happen in 01:04 blue states.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I'm Christy Nome here in Texas with my boots on the ground after this devastating tragedy that was absolutely not preventable and we are in no way responsible for it after visiting here I recently found out that Habius Corpus is the name of a city here in Texas and is in fact not a legal term which means the president can do whatever he wants. I have been told by some people that in addition to being the Secretary of Homeland Security that does also make me the head of Fema Fema sounds like female or feminism and that's DEI and 00:34 I don't believe in that. President Trump has entrusted me to be in charge of Fema which is not a federal emergency management agency. In fact, all emergencies are actually being managed by the state and the reason why I am here is to make sure to get some good film for my B roll. It is completely disgusting that there are people out there who are trying to politicize the devastation that happened here in Texas and I would like to remind everyone that it is only okay to politicize natural disasters when they happen in 01:04 blue states.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Built on ancient Native American mounds near the meeting point of where the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers clash, the town sits at a natural crossroads. During the Civil War, that geography turned it into a vital Union stronghold. Mound City became home to one of the largest military hospitals in the West and served as a major naval station. Soldiers from both sides passed through some to recover, many not. It may be quiet now, but this place once pulsed with the urgency of life and death and sat at the crossroad of a nation at war with itself. That history lingers most clearly at the Mound City National Cemetery, just beyond the edge of town. I wasn’t expecting to find it, and I certainly wasn’t expecting the names etched into some of the stones. Two men in particular stood out, John Basil Turchin and Alexander Bielaski. Both born in the Russian Empire. Both connected to Abraham Lincoln. Both now buried here, far from where they began. John Basil Turchin (born Ivan Turchaninov) had once been a colonel in the Russian Imperial Army. He fought in the Crimean War before immigrating to the United States in 1856. When the Civil War broke out, he offered his experience to the Union cause with fierce conviction. His military background and abolitionist ideals caught Lincoln’s attention, and he was appointed a brigadier general, becoming the only Russian born general to serve in the Union Army. He died in 1901 and was laid to rest here, among the soldiers he once led, and some that he fought against.
Partially True

Fact Check: Built on ancient Native American mounds near the meeting point of where the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers clash, the town sits at a natural crossroads. During the Civil War, that geography turned it into a vital Union stronghold. Mound City became home to one of the largest military hospitals in the West and served as a major naval station. Soldiers from both sides passed through some to recover, many not. It may be quiet now, but this place once pulsed with the urgency of life and death and sat at the crossroad of a nation at war with itself. That history lingers most clearly at the Mound City National Cemetery, just beyond the edge of town. I wasn’t expecting to find it, and I certainly wasn’t expecting the names etched into some of the stones. Two men in particular stood out, John Basil Turchin and Alexander Bielaski. Both born in the Russian Empire. Both connected to Abraham Lincoln. Both now buried here, far from where they began. John Basil Turchin (born Ivan Turchaninov) had once been a colonel in the Russian Imperial Army. He fought in the Crimean War before immigrating to the United States in 1856. When the Civil War broke out, he offered his experience to the Union cause with fierce conviction. His military background and abolitionist ideals caught Lincoln’s attention, and he was appointed a brigadier general, becoming the only Russian born general to serve in the Union Army. He died in 1901 and was laid to rest here, among the soldiers he once led, and some that he fought against.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Built on ancient Native American mounds near the meeting point of where the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers clash, the town sits at a natural crossroads. During the Civil War, that geography turned it into a vital Union stronghold. Mound City became home to one of the largest military hospitals in the West and served as a major naval station. Soldiers from both sides passed through some to recover, many not. It may be quiet now, but this place once pulsed with the urgency of life and death and sat at the crossroad of a nation at war with itself. That history lingers most clearly at the Mound City National Cemetery, just beyond the edge of town. I wasn’t expecting to find it, and I certainly wasn’t expecting the names etched into some of the stones. Two men in particular stood out, John Basil Turchin and Alexander Bielaski. Both born in the Russian Empire. Both connected to Abraham Lincoln. Both now buried here, far from where they began. John Basil Turchin (born Ivan Turchaninov) had once been a colonel in the Russian Imperial Army. He fought in the Crimean War before immigrating to the United States in 1856. When the Civil War broke out, he offered his experience to the Union cause with fierce conviction. His military background and abolitionist ideals caught Lincoln’s attention, and he was appointed a brigadier general, becoming the only Russian born general to serve in the Union Army. He died in 1901 and was laid to rest here, among the soldiers he once led, and some that he fought against.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donald Trump cares more about the United States image than the people who live there
Partially True

Fact Check: Donald Trump cares more about the United States image than the people who live there

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump cares more about the United States image than the people who live there

Aug 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The image presents a political meme contrasting economic indicators from "6 months ago" and "Today" in relation to a statement attributed to Donald Trump about the state of the country. Claim Attributed to Trump: The meme states that "Trump just said that 6 months ago we had a dead country and people didn't think we would survive." Economic Data - 6 Months Ago: GDP: +2.8% Dow Jones: 45,014 S&P 500: 6,086 Gas Prices: $3.03 Economic Data - Today: GDP: -.03% Dow Jones: 42,098 S&P 500: 5,888 Gas Prices: $3.14 Visual Representation: The image includes side-by-side photos of Joe Biden and Donald Trump, positioned above the respective economic data sets.
Partially True

Fact Check: The image presents a political meme contrasting economic indicators from "6 months ago" and "Today" in relation to a statement attributed to Donald Trump about the state of the country. Claim Attributed to Trump: The meme states that "Trump just said that 6 months ago we had a dead country and people didn't think we would survive." Economic Data - 6 Months Ago: GDP: +2.8% Dow Jones: 45,014 S&P 500: 6,086 Gas Prices: $3.03 Economic Data - Today: GDP: -.03% Dow Jones: 42,098 S&P 500: 5,888 Gas Prices: $3.14 Visual Representation: The image includes side-by-side photos of Joe Biden and Donald Trump, positioned above the respective economic data sets.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The image presents a political meme contrasting economic indicators from "6 months ago" and "Today" in relation to a statement attributed to Donald Trump about the state of the country. Claim Attributed to Trump: The meme states that "Trump just said that 6 months ago we had a dead country and people didn't think we would survive." Economic Data - 6 Months Ago: GDP: +2.8% Dow Jones: 45,014 S&P 500: 6,086 Gas Prices: $3.03 Economic Data - Today: GDP: -.03% Dow Jones: 42,098 S&P 500: 5,888 Gas Prices: $3.14 Visual Representation: The image includes side-by-side photos of Joe Biden and Donald Trump, positioned above the respective economic data sets.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks