Fact Check: "28 states chose to ignore the birthright citizenship fight against Trump."
What We Know
The claim that "28 states chose to ignore the birthright citizenship fight against Trump" seems to stem from a broader context regarding President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship and subsequent legal challenges. According to reports, rights groups and 22 states did indeed challenge Trump's executive order in court, aiming to block its enforcement (NPR). The executive order itself stated that the Fourteenth Amendment does not universally extend citizenship to all born in the U.S., which has been a point of contention (White House).
However, the claim specifically mentions 28 states ignoring the issue, which is not corroborated by the available evidence. The Supreme Court's ruling did limit lower courts' ability to issue universal injunctions against such executive actions, but it did not directly rule on the legality of the executive order itself (NPR). This suggests that while some states were active in legal challenges, the assertion that 28 states ignored the issue lacks specific evidence and clarity.
Analysis
The claim appears to misrepresent the situation regarding state responses to Trump's executive order. While it is true that a significant number of states (22) took legal action against the executive order, the assertion that 28 states ignored the issue is misleading. The discrepancy in numbers raises questions about the accuracy of the claim.
Furthermore, the sources used to support the claim vary in reliability. The executive order itself is a primary source, directly reflecting the administration's stance on birthright citizenship (White House). In contrast, secondary sources like NPR and other news outlets provide context and analysis of the legal battles that ensued, including the Supreme Court's rulings (NPR, New York Times).
The credibility of these sources is generally high, as they are established news organizations with a track record of reporting on legal and political matters. However, the claim's specificity regarding the number of states involved appears to be an overreach or misinterpretation of the actual legal landscape.
Conclusion
Needs Research. The claim that "28 states chose to ignore the birthright citizenship fight against Trump" does not align with the documented actions of states regarding the executive order. While there were indeed legal challenges from a significant number of states, the assertion lacks clarity and accuracy. Further investigation into the specific actions of the states and the context of the legal challenges is necessary to fully understand the situation.
Sources
- Protecting The Meaning And Value Of American Citizenship
- What is birthright citizenship and what happens after ...
- What the Supreme Court's Ruling Will Mean for Birthright ...
- Immigrants scramble for clarity after Supreme Court ...
- Supreme Court limits nationwide orders that have blocked ...
- Supreme Court, in birthright citizenship case, limits judges' ...
