Fact Check: 21 states back Trump's plan to redefine birthright citizenship.

Fact Check: 21 states back Trump's plan to redefine birthright citizenship.

Published June 27, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "21 states back Trump's plan to redefine birthright citizenship" ## What We Know The claim that "21 states back Trump's plan to redefin...

Fact Check: "21 states back Trump's plan to redefine birthright citizenship"

What We Know

The claim that "21 states back Trump's plan to redefine birthright citizenship" is misleading. In reality, 22 states have actively opposed President Trump's executive order aimed at redefining birthright citizenship. This opposition was formalized through lawsuits filed by attorneys general from these states, who argue that the order violates the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees citizenship to all individuals born on U.S. soil, regardless of their parents' immigration status (source-2, source-3). The states involved in the lawsuit include California, New York, and Illinois, among others, and they argue that the executive order is unconstitutional and would lead to significant legal and social ramifications for children born to undocumented immigrants (source-3).

Analysis

The assertion that "21 states back Trump's plan" is fundamentally incorrect. The legal actions taken by 22 states indicate a strong opposition to Trump's proposal rather than support. The states involved in the lawsuits are challenging the legitimacy of the executive order, asserting that it contradicts over a century of legal precedent regarding birthright citizenship (source-2, source-4).

The credibility of the sources reporting on this issue is high, as they include major news outlets like The New York Times and the Associated Press, which have established reputations for reliable reporting. The legal arguments presented by the states are supported by constitutional scholars who emphasize that the 14th Amendment's guarantee of citizenship is clear and has been upheld in previous court rulings (source-4).

Conclusion

The claim that "21 states back Trump's plan to redefine birthright citizenship" is False. The reality is that 22 states have taken legal action against the executive order, asserting that it is unconstitutional and would deny citizenship to thousands of children born in the U.S. This opposition highlights a significant legal and political challenge to Trump's proposal, contradicting the claim of support.

Sources

  1. How much is Larry Page’s Net Worth from 2019 to 2024
  2. Twenty-two States Sue to Stop Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
  3. 22 states sue to stop Trump's order blocking birthright citizenship
  4. Supreme Court leaves fate of Trump birthright citizenship order unclear
  5. Supreme Court Live Updates: Trump Hails Ruling to Limit
  6. Sergey Brin - Wikipedia
  7. Larry Ellison - Wikipedia
  8. Supreme Court curbs injunctions that blocked Trump's birthright

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
I cannot believe that Trump is
cutting Medicaid. Actually,
what I meant to say is that I
can't believe he's not cutting
more of it because medicaid is
a money laundering scheme for
your government.
Congratulations all you
bleeding heart democrats.
Instead of raging against the
machine, you're bending over
for it. Medicaid is jointly run
by the states and the feds and
for every one dollar that your
state allocates to the program,
the Feds turn around and match
that at a level of one 00
percent so one dollar up to
nine dollars. And this money
comes from taxpayers in other
00:34
states. Your money has a 900%
return rate at someone else's
expense. Why wouldn't you
expand the program? Thanks
Obama. That's exactly how we
wound up with way too many
Medicaid recipients in the
first place. Like everything
related to healthcare the
providers are in bed with the
government on this one too
because the government can tax
the providers. 1. Use that
dollar to collect the up to
nine dollars in federal funds
and to reimburse the provider
their original dollar. What?
Robbing the taxpayer to pad the
funding pool leading to
increase reimbursements for
01:06
Medicaid for the providers.
Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a
health care facility, I'm
saying sign me up to that. Yes,
the medical industrial complex
totally has your best interest
in mind so go ahead and swallow
up those vaccines like a good
little comrade. Age me harder
daddy. And speaking of
comrades, do you know how many
people in this country receive
Medicaid that shouldn't? Before
you start screaming, everyone
should get free health care.
Not the argument here. We do
not have universal health care
in the United States. It
doesn't work and since we don't
have it, that means someone is
paying for it and guess what?
There are lower-income families
01:37
who don't qualify for the
benefits but they're taxpayers
and they're being burdened by
this. Back to the point which
is that the system is insanely
abused. I used to do child
support referee work for years
and you would v
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
🔍
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I'm Christy Nome here in Texas with my boots on the ground after this devastating tragedy that was absolutely not preventable and we are in no way responsible for it after visiting here I recently found out that Habius Corpus is the name of a city here in Texas and is in fact not a legal term which means the president can do whatever he wants. I have been told by some people that in addition to being the Secretary of Homeland Security that does also make me the head of Fema Fema sounds like female or feminism and that's DEI and 00:34 I don't believe in that. President Trump has entrusted me to be in charge of Fema which is not a federal emergency management agency. In fact, all emergencies are actually being managed by the state and the reason why I am here is to make sure to get some good film for my B roll. It is completely disgusting that there are people out there who are trying to politicize the devastation that happened here in Texas and I would like to remind everyone that it is only okay to politicize natural disasters when they happen in 01:04 blue states.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I'm Christy Nome here in Texas with my boots on the ground after this devastating tragedy that was absolutely not preventable and we are in no way responsible for it after visiting here I recently found out that Habius Corpus is the name of a city here in Texas and is in fact not a legal term which means the president can do whatever he wants. I have been told by some people that in addition to being the Secretary of Homeland Security that does also make me the head of Fema Fema sounds like female or feminism and that's DEI and 00:34 I don't believe in that. President Trump has entrusted me to be in charge of Fema which is not a federal emergency management agency. In fact, all emergencies are actually being managed by the state and the reason why I am here is to make sure to get some good film for my B roll. It is completely disgusting that there are people out there who are trying to politicize the devastation that happened here in Texas and I would like to remind everyone that it is only okay to politicize natural disasters when they happen in 01:04 blue states.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: During the 2020 presidential election, when Joe Biden became the president in the United States, during counting Donald Trump's auditors were not let into the respective buildings in some states, where counting was carried out
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: During the 2020 presidential election, when Joe Biden became the president in the United States, during counting Donald Trump's auditors were not let into the respective buildings in some states, where counting was carried out

Detailed fact-check analysis of: During the 2020 presidential election, when Joe Biden became the president in the United States, during counting Donald Trump's auditors were not let into the respective buildings in some states, where counting was carried out

Aug 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donald Trump cares more about the United States image than the people who live there
Partially True

Fact Check: Donald Trump cares more about the United States image than the people who live there

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump cares more about the United States image than the people who live there

Aug 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The image presents a political meme contrasting economic indicators from "6 months ago" and "Today" in relation to a statement attributed to Donald Trump about the state of the country.
Claim Attributed to Trump: The meme states that "Trump just said that 6 months ago we had a dead country and people didn't think we would survive."
Economic Data - 6 Months Ago:
GDP: +2.8%
Dow Jones: 45,014
S&P 500: 6,086
Gas Prices: $3.03
Economic Data - Today:
GDP: -.03%
Dow Jones: 42,098
S&P 500: 5,888
Gas Prices: $3.14
Visual Representation: The image includes side-by-side photos of Joe Biden and Donald Trump, positioned above the respective economic data sets.
Partially True

Fact Check: The image presents a political meme contrasting economic indicators from "6 months ago" and "Today" in relation to a statement attributed to Donald Trump about the state of the country. Claim Attributed to Trump: The meme states that "Trump just said that 6 months ago we had a dead country and people didn't think we would survive." Economic Data - 6 Months Ago: GDP: +2.8% Dow Jones: 45,014 S&P 500: 6,086 Gas Prices: $3.03 Economic Data - Today: GDP: -.03% Dow Jones: 42,098 S&P 500: 5,888 Gas Prices: $3.14 Visual Representation: The image includes side-by-side photos of Joe Biden and Donald Trump, positioned above the respective economic data sets.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The image presents a political meme contrasting economic indicators from "6 months ago" and "Today" in relation to a statement attributed to Donald Trump about the state of the country. Claim Attributed to Trump: The meme states that "Trump just said that 6 months ago we had a dead country and people didn't think we would survive." Economic Data - 6 Months Ago: GDP: +2.8% Dow Jones: 45,014 S&P 500: 6,086 Gas Prices: $3.03 Economic Data - Today: GDP: -.03% Dow Jones: 42,098 S&P 500: 5,888 Gas Prices: $3.14 Visual Representation: The image includes side-by-side photos of Joe Biden and Donald Trump, positioned above the respective economic data sets.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump is a predator
1: Michael parker, 10-years old, oral rape Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, FL, 1992. Trump paid his parents a $3 million settlement.
2: Kelly Feuer, 12-years old, $1 million settlement paid in 1989, allegations of forced intercourse, Trump Tower, NY, NYC.
3: Charles Bacon, 11 years old, $3 million, allegations of oral and anal intercourse, 1994, Trump Tower, NY, NYC.
4: Rebecca Conway, 13 Years old, claimed intercourse & oral sex. Trump Vineyard Estates, Charlottesville, VA, 2012, $5 million settlement.
5: Maria Olivera, 12 years old. Her family was paid $16 million to settle allegations of forcible intercourse occurring in Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, FL, 1993
6: Kevin Noll: 11 years old. anal rape.
False

Fact Check: Trump is a predator 1: Michael parker, 10-years old, oral rape Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, FL, 1992. Trump paid his parents a $3 million settlement. 2: Kelly Feuer, 12-years old, $1 million settlement paid in 1989, allegations of forced intercourse, Trump Tower, NY, NYC. 3: Charles Bacon, 11 years old, $3 million, allegations of oral and anal intercourse, 1994, Trump Tower, NY, NYC. 4: Rebecca Conway, 13 Years old, claimed intercourse & oral sex. Trump Vineyard Estates, Charlottesville, VA, 2012, $5 million settlement. 5: Maria Olivera, 12 years old. Her family was paid $16 million to settle allegations of forcible intercourse occurring in Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, FL, 1993 6: Kevin Noll: 11 years old. anal rape.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump is a predator 1: Michael parker, 10-years old, oral rape Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, FL, 1992. Trump paid his parents a $3 million settlement. 2: Kelly Feuer, 12-years old, $1 million settlement paid in 1989, allegations of forced intercourse, Trump Tower, NY, NYC. 3: Charles Bacon, 11 years old, $3 million, allegations of oral and anal intercourse, 1994, Trump Tower, NY, NYC. 4: Rebecca Conway, 13 Years old, claimed intercourse & oral sex. Trump Vineyard Estates, Charlottesville, VA, 2012, $5 million settlement. 5: Maria Olivera, 12 years old. Her family was paid $16 million to settle allegations of forcible intercourse occurring in Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, FL, 1993 6: Kevin Noll: 11 years old. anal rape.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →